Stenting small vessels? Not a small issue

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 430-431

  Bass, Theodore A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY DIAMETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY STENT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; EDITORIAL; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RESTENOSIS; SMALL CORONARY ARTERY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; METALS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 3843093029     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20153     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Costa MA, Sabate M, Staico R, Alfonso F, Gilmore P, Sasseen B, Zenni M, Cristina SA, Sousa JE, Macaya C, Bass TA. Physiologic and anatomical evaluation prior to and after stent implantation in small coronary vessels: final results of the PHANTOM trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(Suppl A):1121-1161.
2. Bech GJ, de Brunye B, Pijls Nh, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje J, Escaned J, Stella P, Boersma E, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ, Wijns W. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis a randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-2934.