Using metrics to evaluate student programs

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 41-43

  Leach, Ronald J ^a  

^a HOWARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843092917     PISSN: 00978418     EISSN: N/A     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/201998.202010     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dalbey, J. & Linn, M.C. (1985). The demands and requirements of computer programming: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 253-274.
2. Kurland, D.M., Pea, R.D., Clement, C. & Mawby, R. (1986). A study of the development of programming ability and thinking skills in high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(4), 429–458.
3. Linn, M.C. & Clancy, M.J. (1992). Can experts’ explanations help students to develop program design skills? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36,511-551.
4. Linn, M.C., Sloane, K. & Clancy, M.J. (1987) Ideal and actual outcomes from precollege Pascal instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 467–490.
5. Palinscar, A.S. & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension - fostering and comprehension - monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
6. Petre, M. (1990). Expert programmers and programming languages. In Hoc, J.M., Green, T.R.G. Samurcay, R. & Gilmore, D.J. (Eds). Psychology of Programming. London: Academic Press.
7. Schwartz, S., Perkins, D.N., Estey, G., Kruidenier, J. & Simmons, R. (1989). A “metacourse” for BASIC: Assessing a new model for enhancing instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 3, 263–297.
8. Volet, S.E. (1991). Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students’ learning. Learning and Instruction, 1,319-336.
9. Wilson, J., Hoskin, N. & Nosek, J. (1993). The benefits of collaboration for student programmers. SICCSE Bulletin, 25(1), 160–163.