Using the information structure model to compare profile-based information filtering systems

Information Retrieval

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 75-97

  Elovici, Yuval ^a   Shapira, Bracha ^a   Kantor, Paul B ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Formal model; Information economics; Performance; User profile

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843083953     PISSN: 13864564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022952531694     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ahituv NA (1981) Comparison of information structures for a "rigid decision rule" case. Decision Sciences, 12:399-416.
2. Ahituv N and Ronen B (1988) Orthogonal information structures - A model to evaluate the information provided by second opinion. Decision Sciences, 19:255-268.
3. Ahituv N and Wand Y (1984) Comparative estimation of information under two business objectives. Decision Sciences, 15:31-51.
4. Baeza-Yates R and Ribeiro-Neto B (1999) Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, New York.
5. Belkin NJ and Croft WB (1992) Information filtering and information retrieval two sides of the same coin? Communications of the ACM, 35(12):29-38.
6. Blackwell D (1951) Comparison of experiments. In: Neyman J, Ed., Proceedings of the Second Berekeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 93-102.
7. Blackwell D and Girshick MA (1954, 1979) Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions. John Wiley and Sons (1954), Dover (1979), p. 353.
8. Carmi N and Ronen B (1996), An information value approach to quality control attribute sampling. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3):615-627.
9. Demski JS (1972) Information Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
10. Frakes WB and Baeza-Yates R (1992) Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Hanani U, Shapira B and Shoval P (2001) Information filtering: Overview of issues, research and systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11:203-259.
12. Hilton RW (1990) Failure of Blackwell's Theorem under Machina's generalization of expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Journal of Economics Behavior & Organization, 13(2):233-244.
13. th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-8), NIST SP 500-246, pp. 35-36.
14. Kantor PB and Voorhees EM (2000) The TREC-5 confusion track: Comparing retrieval methods for scanned text. Information Retrieval, v2:165-177.
15. Luce RD and Winterfeldt D (1994) What common ground exists for descriptive, prescriptive, and normative utility theories, Management Science, 40:263-279.
16. Marschak J (1971) Economics of information systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 192-219.
17. Marshall RM and Narashimhan R (1989) Risk constrained information choice. Decision Sciences, 20(4):677-684.
18. McGuire CB and Radner R (1986), Eds. Decision and Organization. North Holland, Amsterdam.
19. Oard WD (1997) The state of the art in text filtering. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction (UMUAI), 7(3):141-178.
20. Robertson SE (2002) Overview of The TREC routing and filtering tasks. Information Retrieval, 5:127-137
21. Ronen B (1994) An information value approach to quality control attribute sampling. European Journal of Operational Research, 73:430-442.
22. Ronen B and Spector Y (1995) Evaluating sampling strategy under two criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 80:59-67.
23. Sinchcombe MB (1990) Baysian information topologies. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 19(3):233-253.
24. Tauge-Sutcliffe J (1992) Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process. In: Proceedings of the Fifteen Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 23-36.
25. Van Rijsbergen C (1979) Information Retrieval, 2nd edn. Butterworth, London (Especially chapter 7).