The action research paradigm: An alternative approach in negotiation

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 339-354

  Akdere, Mesut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Action research; Decision making; Negotiation; Problem solving; Process

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843082885     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1027354823205     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., and Smith, D. M. (1985). Action Science, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
2. Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J. (1997). Action Research as a Living Practice, Peter Lang, New York.
3. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.
4. Costantino, C. A., and Merchant, C. S. (1996). Designing Conflict Management Systems: A Guide to Creating Productive and Healthy Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
5. Cummings, T. G., and Worley, C. G. (2001). Organization Development and Change (7th ed.), Southwestern College, Cincinnati, OH.
6. Downie, B. M. (1991). When negotiations fails: Causes of breakdown and tactics for breaking the stalemate. Negot. J. 7(2), 175-186.
7. Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change, Open University Press, Philadelphia.
8. Evarts, W. R., Greenstone, J. L., Kirkpatrick, G., and Leviton, S. C. (1983). Winning Through Accommodation: The Mediator's Handbook: The Use of New, Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution in the Last Decades of the 20th Century, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA.
9. Fisher, R. (1983). Negotiating power: Getting and using influence. Am. Behav. Sci. 27(2), 135-147.
10. Fisher, R. (1985). Beyond yes. Negot. J. 1(1), 67-70.
11. Fisher, R., and Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
12. Folberg, J., and Taylor, A. (1984). Mediation: A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts Without Litigation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
13. Fox, W. M. (1990). An interview with Eric Trist, father of the sociotechnical systems approach. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 26(2), 259-279.
14. French, W., and Bell, C. (1999). Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement (6th ed.), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
15. Haynes, J. M. (1985). Matching readiness and willingness to the mediator's strategies. Negot. J. 1(1), 79-82.
16. Kelley, H. H. (1966). A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. In Archibald, K. (ed.), Strategic Interaction and Conflict: Original Papers and Discussion, Institute of International Studies, Berkeley, CA.
17. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. J. Soc. Issues 2, 34-46.
18. Lynch, J. (1998). CCRA: Contemporary Conflict Resolution Approaches, Revenue Canada Recourse Study.
19. McCarthy, W. (1985). The role of power and principle in getting to yes. Negot. J. 1(1), 59-66.
20. Murray, J. S. (1986). Understanding competing theories of negotiation. Negot. J. 6(2), 179-187.
21. Oja, S., and Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative Action Research: A Developmental Approach, Falmer Press, London.
22. Peters, M., and Robinson, V. (1984). The origins and status of action research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 20 (2), 113-124.
23. Raiffa, H. (1983). Mediation of conflicts. Am. Behav. Sci. 27(3), 195-210.
24. Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research. Hum. Relat. 23(6), 499-513.
25. Rowe, M. P. (1997). Dispute resolution in the non-union environment: An evolution toward integrated systems for conflict management? In Gleason, S. E. (ed.), Workplace Dispute Resolution: Directions for the Twenty-First Century, Michigan State University Press, East Lansing.
26. Rubin, J. Z. (1983). Negotiation: An Introduction to some issues and themes. Am. Behav. Sci. 27(2), 135-147.
27. Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.
28. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
29. Stinger, E. T. (1999). Action Research (2nd ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
30. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
31. Susskind, L., McKearnon, S., and Thomas-Larmer, J. (2000). The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
32. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: 4th edition (2003). [Online]. Available: http://www.bartleby.com/61/29/C0562900. html.
33. Ury, W., Brett, J. M., and Goldberg, S. B. (1988). Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
34. White, J. J. (1980). Machiavelli and the bar: Ethical limitations on lying in negotiations. Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 921(3), 926-938.
35. White, J. J. (1984). The pros and cons of getting to yes. J. Legal Educ. 34(1), 115-124.
36. Whyte, W. (1991). Participatory Action Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
37. Williams, G. R. (1983). Legal Negotiation and Settlement, West, St. Paul, MN.
38. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Improving learning and teaching through action learning and action research. Draft paper for the HERDSA Conference.