Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: The Spearman-Kärber method

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 517-533

  Ulrich, Rolf ^a   Miller, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843071881     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194898     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. BLACKWELL, H. R. (1953). Psychophysical thresholds: Experimental studies of methods of measurement (Rep. No. 36). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Bulletin of the Engineering Research Institute.
2. BUSH, R. R. (1963). Estimation and evaluation. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. I, pp. 429-469). New York: Wiley.
3. CHURCH, J. D., & COBB, E. B. (1973). On the equivalence of the Spearman-Kärber and maximum likelihood estimates of the mean. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 201-202.
4. ENGEN, T. (1971). Psychophysics: I. Discrimination and detection. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 11-46). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. EPSTEIN, B., & CHURCHMAN, C. W. (1944). On the statistics of sensitivity data. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 15, 90-96.
6. FALMAGNE, J. C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. FECHNER, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
8. FELLER, W. (1971). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. II, 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
9. GARCÍA-PÉREZ, M. A. (2002). Properties of some variants of adaptive staircases with fixed step sizes. Spatial Vision, 15, 303-321.
10. GESCHEIDER, G. A. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. GOLDSTEIN, L. J., LAY, D. L., & SCHNEIDER, D. I. (1987). Calculus and its applications (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. GREEN, D. M. (1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2662-2674.
13. GREEN, D. M., RICHARDS, V. M., & FORREST, T. G. (1989). Stimulus step size and heterogeneous stimulus conditions in adaptive psychophysics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 629-636.
14. HARVEY, L. O., JR. (1986). Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 623-632.
15. JONES, F. N. (1956). A forced-choice method of limits. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 672-673.
16. KÄRBER, G. (1931). Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche [A contribution to the collective treatment of a pharmacological experimental series]. Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 162, 480-483.
17. KLEIN, S. A. (2001). Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1421-1455.
18. KLEIN, S. A., & MACMILLAN, N. A. (EDS.) (2001). Psychometric functions and adaptive methods [Special issue]. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8).
19. LAM, C. P., DUBNO, J. R., & MILLS, J. H. (1999). Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: A computer simulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1969-1976.
20. LEEK, M. R. (2001). Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1279-1292.
21. LINSCHOTEN, M. R., HARVEY, L. O., JR., ELLER, P. M., & JAFEK, B. W. (2001). Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1330-1347.
22. LUCE, R. D. (1963). A threshold theory for simple detection experiments. Psychological Review, 70, 61-79.
23. LUCE, R. D. (1993). Sound and hearing: A conceptual introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. MCKEE, S. P., KLEIN, S. A., & TELLER, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 286-298.
26. MILLER, J. (1998). Cupid: A program for computations with probability distributions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 544-545.
27. MILLER, J., & ULRICH, R. (2001). On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1399-1420.
28. MILLER, J., & ULRICH, R. (2003). A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 11-16.
29. MOOD, A. M., GRAYBILL, F. A., & BOES, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. MORTENSEN, U. (2002). Additive noise, Weibull functions, and the approximation of psychometric functions. Vision Research, 42, 2371-2393.
31. RINKENAUER, G., MATTES, S., & ULRICH, R. (1999). The surface-weight illusion: On the contribution of grip force to perceived heaviness. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 23-30.
32. ROSENBROCK, H. H. (1960). An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. Computer Journal, 3, 175-184.
33. Ross, S. M. (2000). Introduction to probability models (7th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
34. SEN, A. R. (1985). Location parameter, estimation of. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 101-105). New York: Wiley.
35. SPEARMAN, C. (1908). The method of "right and wrong cases" ("constant stimuli") without Gauss's formulae. British Journal of Psychology, 2, 227-242.
36. STERNBERG, S., & KNOLL, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 629-685). New York: Academic Press.
37. STERNBERG, S., KNOLL, R. L., & ZUKOFSKY, P. (1982). Timing by skilled musicians. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 181-239). New York: Academic Press.
38. STRASBURGER, H. (2001a). Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1348-1355.
39. STRASBURGER, H. (2001b). Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1356-1376.
40. STUART, A., & ORD, J. K. (1987). Kendall's advanced theory of statistics: Vol. I. Distributional theory (5th ed.). London: Griffin.
41. TREUTWEIN, B., & STRASBURGER, H. (1999). Fitting the psychometric function. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 87-106.
42. TREVAN, J. W. (1927). The error of determination of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 101, 483-514.
43. ULRICH, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 224-239.
44. WICHMANN, F. A., & HILL, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313.
45. WONNACOTT, T. H., & WONNACOTT, R. H. (1977). Introductory statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
46. WOODWORTH, R. S., & SCHLOSBERG, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
47. YESHURUN, Y. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293-306.