Assessing landmark influence on shape variation

Biometrika

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 669-678

  Albert, Michael H ^a   Le, Huiling ^b   Small, Christopher G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Horizontal geodesic; Landmark; Procrustes mean; Shape; Shape difference; Shape distance; Weight function

Indexed keywords

PROCRUSTES;

EID: 3843057800     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/90.3.669     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools For Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. COLE, T. M., III & RICHTSMEIER, J. T. (1998). A simple method for visualization of influential landmarks when using Euclidean Distance Matrix Analysis. Am, J. Phys. Anthropol. 107, 273-83.
3. DRYDEN, I. L. & MARDIA, K. V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
4. GALTON, F. (1907). Classification of portraits. Nature 76, 617-8.
5. KENDALL, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. Land. Math. Soc. 16, 81-121.
6. KENDALL, D. G., BARDEN, D., CARNE, T. K. & LE, H. (1999). Shape and Shape Theory. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
7. LELE, S. & RICHTSMEIER, J. T. (1992). On comparing biological shapes: detection of influential landmarks. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 87, 49-66.
8. SMALL, C. G. (1996). The Statistical Theory of Shape. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. THOMPSON, D'A. W. (1917). On Growth and Form. Abridged and edited by J. T. Bonner (1961). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.