Recommendations to improve recovery of endangered species in the united states

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 37-53

  Hadlock, Timothy D ^a   Beckwith, Jo Ann ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered Species; Human Dimensions; Incentives; Property Rights; Recovery

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349195648     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/108712002753574774     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Babbitt, B. (1999). Noah’s mandate and the birth of urban bioplanning. Conservation Biology, 13(3), 677-678.
2. Babbitt, B. (2001, April 15). Bush isn’t all wrong about the Endangered Species Act. New York Times, sec. 4, p. 11, col. 1.
3. Bean, M. (1999a). Endangered species, endangered act. Environment, 41(1), 12-18, 3438.
4. Bean, M. (1999b). Testimony of Michael J. Bean: Endangered species habitat conservation plans (Statement by a witness). Washington, DC: U. S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works, Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Drinking Water.
5. Bean, M. J. (1998a). The Endangered Species Act and private land: Four lessons learned from the past quarter century. Environmental Law Reporter, 28, 10701-10710.
6. Bean, M. J. (1998b). Four sure ways to undermine a good idea… and hurt endangered species. Endangered Species UPDATE, 15(6), 94-96.
7. Bromley, D. W. (1986). Markets and Externalities. In D. W. Bromley (Ed.), Natural Resource Economics: Policy Problems and Contemporary Analysis (pp. 36-68). Boston: Kluwer.
8. Cannon, J. R., Dietz, J. M., & Dietz, L. A. (1996). Training conservation biologists in human interaction skills. Conservation Biology, 10, 1277-1282.
9. Cheever, F. (1996). The road to recovery: A new way of thinking about the Endangered Species Act. Ecology Law Quarterly, 23, 1-78.
10. Clark, J. R. (1999). The ecosystem approach from a practical point of view. Conservation Biology, 13(3), 679-681.
11. Clark, T. W. (1996). Learning as a strategy for improving endangered species conservation. Endangered Species UPDATE, 13(1 & 2), 5-6, 22-24.
12. Clark, T. W. (1997). Averting extinction: Reconstructing endangered species recovery. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Clark, T. W., & Wallace, R. L. (1998). Understanding the human factor in endangered species recovery: An introduction to human social process. Endangered Species UPDATE, 15(1), 2-9.
14. Clark, T. W., & Wallace, R. L. (1999). The professional in endangered species conservation: An introduction to standpoint clarification. Endangered Species UPDATE, 16(1), 9-13.
15. Corn, M. L. (2000). Endangered species: Continuing controversy (Issue Brief IB10009). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
16. Czech, B., & Krausman, P. R. (1997). Public opinion on species and endangered species conservation. Endangered Species UPDATE, 14(5 & 6), 7-10.
17. Czech, B., & Krausman, P. R. (1998). Twelve faulty assumptions underlying the endangered species act. Endangered Species UPDATE, 15(4), 52-58.
18. Czech, B., & Krausman, P. R. (1999). Public opinion on endangered species conservation and policy. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 469-479.
19. Dobson, A., Rodriguez, J. P., & Roberts, W. M. (1997). Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States: Response. Science, 277, 1117.
20. Doerksen, H., Leff, C. S., & Simon, B. M. (1998). Policy goals for endangered species recovery. Society & Natural Resources, 11, 365-373.
21. Environmental Defense Fund. (1999). Safe harbor: Helping landowners help endangered species. Washington, DC: Environmental Defense Publications.
22. Foin, T. C., Riley, S. P. D., Pawley, A. L., Ayres, D. R., Carlsen, T. M., Hodum, P. J., & Switzer, P. V. (1998). Improving recovery planning for threatened and endangered species. BioScience, 48(3), 177-184.
23. Forest Incentives Group. (1996). Incentives to encourage stewardship in forestry. Salem, Oregon: Oregon Board of Forestry.
24. FWS (United States Fish & Wildlife Service). (2000, November 22). Flood of court orders preclude new listings of threatened and endangered species in FY 2001. Washington, DC: United States Fish & Wildlife Services News Release.
25. GAO (United States General Accounting Office). (1995). Endangered Species Act: Information on species protection on nonfederal lands (GAO/RCED-95-16). Washington, DC: Author
26. Graham, P. (1994). To list or delist: Incentives for recovery. In W. E. Hudson (Ed.), Building economic incentives into the Endangered Species Act (3rd ed.) (pp. 63-69). Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.
27. Griffin, C. R., & French, T. W. (1992). Protection of threatened and endangered species and their habitats by state regulations: The Massachusetts initiative. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 57, 674-683.
28. Guynn, D. C., Jr., & Lennartz, M. (1992). Accommodation with socio-economic factors under the Endangered Species Act—more than meets the eye. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 57, 627-641.
29. Hood, L. C. (1998). Frayed safety nets: Conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.
30. Houck, O. A. (1993). The endangered species act and its implementation by the U.S. Departments of Interior and Commerce. University of Colorado Law Review, 64, 277-370.
31. Hudson, W., & Fischer, H. (Eds.). (1994). Building economic incentives into the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.
32. Huffaker, S. M., & Harris, C. E. (1995). Conservation Agreements and listings under the Endangered Species Act: A state perspective. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 60, 491-495.
33. Jacobson, S. K., & McDuff, M. D. (1998). Training idiot savants: The lack of human dimensions in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 12(2), 263-267.
34. The Keystone Center. (1995). The Keystone dialogue on incentives for private landowners to protect endangered species (Final Report). Keystone, CO: The Keystone Center.
35. Kotchen, M. J., & Reiling, S. D. (1998). Estimating and questioning economic values for endangered species: An application and discussion. Endangered Species UPDATE, 15(5), 77-83.
36. Kotchen, M. J., & Reiling, S. D. (2000). Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economic.^, 32, 93-107.
37. McKinney, J., Shaffer, M., & Olson, J. (1994). Economic incentives to preserve endangered species habitat and biodiversity on private land. In W. E. Hudson (Ed.), Building economic incentives into the Endangered Species Act (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-17). Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.
38. Metrick, A., & Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 21-34.
39. Millsap, B. A. (1995). Wildlife conservation priorities for Florida: The state’s perspective. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 60, 466-472.
40. Noss, R. F. (1997). The failure of universities to produce conservation biologists. Conservation Biology, 11, 1267-1269.
41. NRC (National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Scientific Issues in the Endangered Species Act). (1995). Science and the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Parenti, R. L. (1995). Conservation agreements: An interim to listing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 60, 482-485.
43. Polasky, S., & Doremus, H. (1998). When the truth hurts: Endangered species policy on private land with imperfect information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35, 22-47.
44. Rhodes, T. C., & Wilson, P. N. (1995). Sky islands, squirrels, and scopes: The political economy of an environmental conflict. Land Economics, 71(1), 106-121.
45. Simon, B. M., Doerksen, H., & Leff, C. (1995). Allocating scarce resources for endangered species recovery. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14, 415-432.
46. Solomon, B. D. (1998). Impending recovery of Kirtland’s warbler: Case study in the effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act. Environmental Management, 22(1), 917.
47. Soule, M. E. (1991). Conservation: Tactics for a constant crisis. Science, 253, 744-750.
48. Tilt, W. (1995). Moving endangered species management from conflict to cooperation. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference (pp. 510-515).
49. Vickerman, S. (1998). Stewardship incentives: Conservation strategies for Oregon’s working landscape. Lake Oswego, OR: Defenders of Wildlife, West Coast Office.
50. Wall, W. A. (1995). Conservation Agreements: Innovative solutions or missed opportunities—a corporate lands perspective. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 60, 496-500.
51. Wallace, R. L., & Clark, T. W. (1999). Solving problems in endangered species conservation: An introduction to problem orientation. Endangered Species UPDATE, 16(2), 28-34.
52. Yager, J. O. (1994). Approaches to conserving endangered species on private lands. In W. E. Hudson (Ed.), Building economic incentives into the Endangered Species Act (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.