Fudging the Numbers: Distributing Chocolate Influences Student Evaluations of an Undergraduate Course

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 245-247

  Youmans, Robert J ^a   Jee, Benjamin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349190034     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00986280701700318     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Arkes H. R. Dawes R. M. Christiansen C. (1986). Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 93–110.
2. Basow S. A. Silberg N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 308–314.
3. Cashin W. E. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited (IDEA Paper No. 32). Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
4. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
5. Greenwald A. G. Gilmore G. M. (1997). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 743–751.
6. Martin L. L. Clore G. L. (eds.). (2001). Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Mayer J. D. McCormick L. J. Strong S. E. (1995). Mood congruent memory and natural mood: New evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 736–746.
8. Schwarz N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 433–440.