The response of subcutaneous connective tissue to a new endodontic filling material

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 463-467

  Bodrumlu, Emre ^a   Muglali, Mehtap ^a   Sumer, Mahmut ^a   Guvenc, Tolga ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Connective tissue reactions; Histopathologic method; Resilon

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); REACTION KINETICS;

CONNECTIVE TISSUE REACTIONS; ENDODONTIC FILLING MATERIAL; HISTOPATHOLOGIC METHOD;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL TYPE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; THICKNESS; TISSUE REACTION; TOOTH FILLING; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

ANIMALS; ENDODONTICS; GUTTA-PERCHA; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL OBTURATION; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 38349187955     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30892     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Endodontic treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, editors. Essential Endodontology, 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 2003. pp 242-277.
2. Saidon J, He J, Zhu Q, Safavi K, Spangberg LS. Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:483-489.
3. Modaresi J, Yavari SA, Dianat SO, Shahrabi S. A comparison of tissue reaction to MTA and an experimental root-end restorative material in rats. Aust Endod J 2005;31:69-72.
4. Zmener O, Banegas G, Pameijer CH. Bone tissue response to a methacrylate-based endodontic sealer: A histological and histometric study. J Endod 2005;31:457-459.
5. Zmener O, Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL. Tissue response to an experimental calcium hydroxide-based endodontic sealer: A quantitative study in subcutaneous connective tissue of the rat. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:66-72.
6. Costa CA, Teixeira HM, do Nascimento AB, Hebling J. Biocompatibility of two current adhesive resins. J Endod 2000;26:512-516.
7. Quinlan CA, Zisterer DM, Tipton KF, O'Sullivan MI. In vitro cytotoxicity of a composite resin and compomer. Int Endod J 2002;35:47-55.
8. Sanders JE, Rochefort JR. Fibrous encapsulation of single polymer microfibers depends on their vertical dimension in subcutaneous tissue. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1181-1187.
9. Holland SM, Galin JI. Disorders of granulocytes and monocytes. In: Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, Isselbacher KJ, editors. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p 351.
10. Sjogren U, Sundqvist G, Nair PN. Tissue reaction to gutta-percha particles of various sizes when implanted subcutaneously in guinea pigs. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:313-321.
11. Zmener O. Tissue response to a new methacrylate-based root canal sealer: Preliminary observations in the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. J Endod 2004;30:348-351.
12. Figueiredo JA, Pesce HF, Gioso MA, Figueiredo MA. The histological effects of four endodontic sealers implanted in the oral mucosa: Submucous injection versus implant in polyethylene tubes. Int Endod J 2001;34:377-385.
13. Tavares T, Soares IJ, Silveira NL. Reaction of rat subcutaneous tissue to implants of gutta-percha for endodontic use. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:174-178.
14. Leonardo MR, Utrilla LS, Rothier A, Leonardo RT, Consolaro A. Comparison of subcutaneous connective tissue responses among three different formulations of gutta-percha used in thermatic techniques. Int Endod J 1990;23:211-217.
15. Moretton TR, Brown CE Jr, Legan JJ, Kafrawy AH. Tissue reactions after subcutaneous and intraosseous implantation of mineral trioxide aggregate and ethoxybenzoic acid cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:528-533.