Dynamic stall modelling on airfoils based on strong viscous-inviscid interaction coupling

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 185-208

  Riziotis, Vasilis A ^a   Voutsinas, Spyros G ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Boundary layer methods; Dynamic stall; Panel methods; Viscous inviscid interaction

Indexed keywords

AIRFOILS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY LAYERS; DYNAMIC MODELS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; FLOW SEPARATION; VISCOSITY; VORTEX FLOW; WAKES; WIND TUNNELS;

PANEL METHOD; VISCOUS-INVISCID INTERACTION;

AERODYNAMICS;

AERODYNAMICS; AIRFOILS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY LAYERS; DYNAMIC MODELS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; FLOW SEPARATION; VISCOSITY; VORTEX FLOW; WAKES; WIND TUNNELS;

EID: 38349181816     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1525     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ekaterinaris JA, Platzer MF. Computational prediction of airfoil dynamic stall. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 1998; 33:759-846.
2. Perot D, Szechenyi E, Arnaud G, Harrison R, Stevens J, Teves D, van der Wall B, Young C. Stall effects and blade torsion - an evaluation of predictive tools. 23rd European Rotorcraft Forum, Dresden, Germany, 1997; Paper 32.
3. Snel H. Review of the present status of rotor aerodynamics. Wind Energy 1998; 1:46-69.
4. Leishman JG, Beddoes TS. A generalized model for airfoil unsteady aerodynamics behavior and dynamic stall using indicial method. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, 1986; 243-265.
5. Petot D. Differential equation modeling of dynamic stall. La Recherche Aerospatiale (English Edition) 1989; 5:59-72.
6. Ekaterinaris JA, Srinivasan GR, McCroskey WJ. Present capabilities of predicting 2D Dynamic-Stall. AGARD-CP-552 Proceedings of the Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of Rotorcraft, Berlin, 1995; Paper 2.
7. Hald O. Convergence of vortex methods II. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis 1979; 16:726-755.
8. Beale JT, Majda A. Vortex methods II: High order accuracy in 2 and 3 dimensions. Mathematics of Computation 1982; 32:29-52.
9. Koumoutsakos P, Leonard A. High resolution simulations of the flow around an impulsively started cylinder using vortex methods. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1995; 296:1-38.
10. Vautsinas SG, Riziotis VA. Vortex particle modeling of stall on rotors. Application to wind turbines. Proceedings of the Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, ASME, San Diego, 1996.
11. Basu BC, Hancock GJ. The unsteady notion of a two-dimensional airfoil in incompressible, inviscid flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1978; 87(Part 1):159-178.
12. Katz J. A discrete vortex method for the non-steady separated flow over an airfoil. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1981; 102:315-328.
13. Vezza M, Galbraith RAMcD. An inviscid model of unsteady acrofoil flow with fixed upper surface separation. Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1985; 5:577-592.
14. max using a separated flow model. Journal of American Helicopter Society 1977; 23(2):2-8.
15. Kermarec M, Decaix AF, Renon P, Favier D, Maresca C. Numerical modeling of unsteady flows around airfoils by a coupled potential-boundary-layer method. European Journal of Mechanics, B-Fluids 1993; 12(5):657-681.
16. Voutsinas SG, Riziotis VA. A viscous-inviscid interaction model for dynamic stall simulations on airfoils. AIAA, 1999; Paper 99-0038.
17. Drela M. XFOIL: an analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. Conference on Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, University Notre Dame, 1989.
18. Drela M, Giles M. Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils. AIAA Journal 1987; 25(10):1347-1355.
19. Lock RC, Williams BR. Viscous-inviscid interactions in external aerodynamics. Progress in Aerospace Science 1987; 24:51-171.
20. LeBalleur JC. Strong matching method for computing transonic viscous flows including wakes and separations. Lifting airfoils. Rec. Aerospatiale No. 1981-3, 1981.
21. Cebeci T (ed.). Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows (vol. IV). Springer: Berlin, 1990.
22. Morino L, Kuot C-C. Subsonic potential aerodynamics for complex configurations: a general theory. AIAA Journal 1974; 12(2):191-197.
23. Swafford. TW. Analytical approximation of two-dimensional separated turbulent boundary-layer velocity profiles. Journal AIAA 1983; 21(6):923-926. Technical notes.
24. van Ingen JL. A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region. Report VTH-74, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 1956.
25. Green JE, Weeks DJ, Brooman JWF. Prediction of turbulent boundary layers and wakes in compressible flow by a Lag-Entrainment method. ARC R&M Report No. 3791, HMSO, London, England, 1977.
26. Bradshaw P, Ferriss DH. Calculation of boundary layer development using the turbulent energy equation: compressible flow on adiabatic walls. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1970; 46(Part 1):83-110.
27. McGhee RJ, Beasley WD. Low speed aerodynamic characteristics of a 17-percent-thick airfoil section designed for general aviation applications. NASA TN D-7428, 1973.
28. East LF. A representation of second order boundary layer effects in the momentum integral equation and in viscous-inviscid interactions. RAE Technical Report, 1981.
29. Piziali RA. An experimental investigation of 2D and 3D oscillating wing aerodynamics for a range of angles of attack including stall. NASA Technical Memorandum 4632, 1994.
30. Galbraith RAMcD, Gracey MW, Leitch E. Summary of pressure data for thirteen aerofoils on the University of Glasgows aerofoil data base. G.U. Aero Report 9221, 1992.
31. McCroskey WJ, McAlister KW, Carr LW, Pucci SL. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections. NASA TM-84245 (vols 1, 2 and 3), 1982.
32. Ekaterinaris JA, Platzer MF. Numerical investigation of stall flutter. Journal of Turbomachinery (ASME) 1996; 118:197-203.