Safety impacts of access management techniques in Utah

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1994, 2007, Pages 35-42

  Schultz, Grant G ^a   Lewis, Jeff S ^b   Boschert, Tim ^c  

^a Brigham Young University   (United States)

^b PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF   (United States)

^c Systems Planning and Programming   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COSTS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ROADS AND STREETS;

ACCESS MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES; ARTERIAL STREETS; SORT CRASH DATA;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 38349177480     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1994-05     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 4th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
2. Access Management Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003.
3. Administrative Rule R930-6: Accommodation of Utilities and the Control and Protection of State Highway Rights of Way. Utah Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development, Railroads, and Utilities Section, Salt Lake City, 2003.
4. Saito, M., D. D. Cox, and T. G. Jin. Evaluation of Four Recent Traffic and Safety Initiatives, Volume II: Developing a Procedure for Evaluating the Need for Raised Medians. Report UT-04.11. Utah Department of Transportation Research and Development Division, Salt Lake City, 2004.
5. Schultz, G. G., and J. S. Lewis. Assessing the Safety Benefits of Access Management Techniques. Report UT-06.08. Utah Department of Transportation Research and Development Division, Salt Lake City, 2006.
6. Eisele, W. L., W. E. Frawley, and C. M. Toycen. Estimating the Impacts of Access Management Techniques: Final Results. Report 0-4221-2. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2004.
7. Stover, V., S. Tignor, and M. Rosenbaum. Access Control and Driveways. In Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Traffic Control and Roadway Elements. Vol. 1. FHWA-TS-82-232. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982.
8. Gluck, J., H. S. Levinson, and V. Stover. NCHRP Report 420: Impacts of Access Management Techniques. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
9. Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE). Access Management Toolkit: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, Continuous Two-Way Left-Turn Lanes, No. 15. Iowa State University, Ames. www.ctre.iastate.edu/ research/access/toolkit/15.pdf.Accessed June 7, 2006.
10. Stover, V. G., and F. J. Koepke. Transportation and Land Development, 2nd ed. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2002.
11. Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE). Access Management Toolkit: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, Continuous Raised Medians, No. 18. Iowa State University, Ames, www.ctre.iastate. edu/research/access/toolkit/18.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2006.
12. Parsonson, P. S., M. G. Waters III, and J. S. Fincher. Georgia Study Confirms the Continuing Safety Advantage of Raised Medians over Two-Way Left-Turn Lanes. Presented at 4th National Conference on Access Management, Portland, Ore., Aug. 2000. www.accessmanagement. gov/pdf/AMOOPAPR.pdf.
13. Anderson, D., C. Glazier, and G. Perrett. UDOT Data Almanac Web Delivered Data User Manual. Utah Department of Transportation Research and Development Division, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006.