A unified starting procedure for the Houbolt method

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-13

  Soroushian, Aram ^a   Farjoodi, Jamshid ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SEISMOLOGY IIEES   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Houbolt method; Initial conditions; Starting procedure; Time integration

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MODELS; ELASTICITY; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PLASTICITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

HOUBOLT METHOD; TIME INTEGRATION;

INTEGRATION;

DYNAMIC MODELS; ELASTICITY; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; INTEGRATION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PLASTICITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 38349174464     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: 10990887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.949     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Belytschko T, Hughes TJR. Computational Methods for Transient Analysis. Elsevier: Netherlands, 1983.
2. Gavin H. Structural Dynamics. Class Notes CE 283. Duke University: U.S.A., 2001.
3. Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics. Wiley: U.S.A., 2002.
4. Hughes TJR, Pister KS, Taylor RL. Explicit-Explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1979; 17/18:159-182.
5. Tamma KK, Zhou X, Sha D. The time dimension: a theory towards the evolution, classification, characterization and design of computational algorithms for transient/dynamic applications. Archive of Computational Methods in Engineering 2000; 7:67-290.
6. Clough RW, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures. McGraw-Hill: Singapore, 1993.
7. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, U.S.A., 1995.
8. Soroushian A, Farjoodi J. More reliable responses for time integration analyses. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2003; 16:219-240.
9. Wang MF, Wang FTK. Higher order mixed method for time integration in dynamic structural analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2004; 278:690-698.
10. Zampieri E, Pavarino LF. Approximation of acoustic waves by explicit Newmark's schemes and spectral element methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2006; 185:308-325.
11. Houbolt JC. A recurrence matrix solution for the dynamic response of elastic aircraft. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 1950; 17:540-550.
12. Humar JL. Dynamics of Structures. Balkema: Netherlands, 2002.
13. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, U.S.A., 1996.
14. Clough RW. Numerical Integration of Equations of Motion. Lectures on Finite Element Methods in Continuum Mechanics. University of Alabama: Huntsville, 1973; 525-533.
15. Newmark NM. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1959; 85:67-94.
16. Wood WL. Practical Time Stepping Schemes. Oxford: U.S.A., 1990.
17. Katona MG, Zienkiewicz OC. A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 3: The beta-m method, a generalization of the Newmark scheme. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1985; 21:1345-1359.
18. Nath Y, Sandeep K. The stability of the Houbolt time marching scheme in non-linear systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1994; 175:565-569.
19. Chung J, Hulbert GM. A family of single-step Houbolt time integration algorithms for structural dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 118:1-11.
20. Verner JH. Starting methods for two-step Runge-Kutta methods of stage-order 3 and order 6. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2006; 185:292-307.
21. Soroushian A, Wriggers P, Farjoodi J. On practical integration of semi-discretized nonlinear equations of motion part one: reasons for probable instability and improper convergence. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2005; 284:705-731.
22. Chen CC, Robinson AR. Improved time-history analysis for structural dynamics. 1: Treatment of rapid variation of excitation and material nonlinearity. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1993; 119:2496-2513.
23. Bernal D. Locating events in step-by-step integration of equations of motion. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1991; 117:530-545.
24. Soroushian A. New methods to maintain responses' convergence and control responses' errors in the analysis of nonlinear dynamic models of structural systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tehran, 2003.
25. Low KH. Convergence of the numerical methods for problems of structural dynamics. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1991; 150:342-349.
26. D'Souza AF, Garg VK. Advanced Dynamics Modeling and Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, U.S.A., 1984.