Theorizing dialogic deliberation: Everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue

Communication Theory

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 51-70

  Kim, Joohan ^a   Kim, Eun Joo ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; DEMOCRACY; POLITICS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 38349172933     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00313.x     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Anderson, R., Baxter, L. A., & Cissna, K. N. (Eds.). (2004). Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Anderson, R., Cissna, K. N., & Arnett, R. C. (Eds.). (1994). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3. Anderson, R., Dardenne, R., & Killenberg, G. (1994). The conversation of journalism: Communication, community, and news. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Arendt, H. (1967). Truth and politics. In P. Laslett & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), Philosophy, politics and society (pp. 104-133). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6. Arnett, R. C. (2004). A dialogic ethic "between" Buber and Levinas: A responsive ethical "I." In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 75-104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Asen, R. (2004). A discourse theory of citizenship. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90, 189-211.
8. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Bausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and everyday life. Media, Culture, and Society, 6, 343-351.
11. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. (L. Nichol, Ed.). London: Routledge.
13. Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Boschki, R. (2005). Re-reading Martin Buber and Janusz Korcazk: Fresh impulses toward a relational approach to religious education. Religious Education, 100, 114-126.
15. Brunsdon, C., & Morley, D. (1979). Everyday television: Nationwide. London: British Film Institute.
16. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (R. G. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark.
17. Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
18. Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
19. Button, M. (2005). Arendt, Rawls, and public reason. Social Theory and Practice, 31, 257-280.
20. Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable democracy: Jurgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. Christiano, T. (1997). The significance of public deliberation. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politic (pp. 243-278). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1994). Communication and the ground of dialogue. In R. Anderson, K. N. Cissna, & R. C. Arnett (Eds.), The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community (pp. 9-30). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
23. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8, 63-104.
24. Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politic (pp. 67-92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Conover, P. J., & Searing, D. D. (2005). Studying "everyday political talk" in the deliberative system. Acta Politica, 40, 269-283.
26. Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21-62.
27. Delli Carpini, M., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
28. Delli Carpini, M., & Williams, B. (1994). Methods, metaphors, and media messages: The uses of television in political conversation. Communication Research, 21, 782-812.
29. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
30. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 729-745.
31. Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Eliasoph, N. (2000). Where can Americans talk politics: Civil society, intimacy, and the case for deep citizenship. Communication Review, 4, 65-94.
34. Elster, J. (Ed.). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177-193.
36. Freire, P. (1990). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
37. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Crossroad.
38. Gambetta, D. (1998). "Claro!": An essay on discursive machismo. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 19-43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. New York: Basic Books.
41. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Giddens, A. (1991). A reply to my critics. In D. Held & J. B. Thompson (Eds.), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
44. Gordon, D. (1989). "Public opinion" and the civilizing process in France: The example of Morellet. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 22, 302-328.
45. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap Press.
46. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
47. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Habermas, J. (1991). The public sphere. In C. Mukerji & M. Schudson (Eds.), Rethinking popular culture: Contemporary perspectives in cultural studies (pp. 398-404). Berkeley: University of California Press.
49. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Habermas, J. (2005). Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40, 384-392.
51. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411-426.
52. Hendley, B. (1978). Martin Buber on the teacher/student relationship: A critical appraisal. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12, 141-148.
53. Hicks, D. (2002). The promise(s) of deliberative democracy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5, 223-260.
54. Johnson, J. (1993). Is talk really cheap? Prompting conversation between critical theory and rational choice. American Political Science Review, 87, 74-86.
55. Katz, E. (1992). On parenting a paradigm: Gabriel Tarde's agenda for opinion and communication research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 80-85.
56. Kim, J. (1999). Communication, reason, and deliberative democracy. Journal of Communication, 49, 137-144.
57. Kim, J., Wyatt, R., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, action: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
58. Kwak, N., Williams, A., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32, 87-111.
59. Lipari, L. (2004). Listening for the other: Ethical implications of the Buber-Levinas encounter. Communication Theory, 14, 122-141.
60. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1997, May). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Montreal, Canada.
61. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Moores, S. (1988). The box on the dresser: Memories of early radio. Media, Culture, and Society, 10, 23-40.
63. Morley, D. (1990). The construction of everyday life: Political communication and domestic media. In D. Swanson & D. Nimmo (Eds.), New directions in political communication: A resource book (pp. 123-146). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Moscovici, S. (1985). The age of the crowd: A treatise on mass psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23, 443-460.
66. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 68, 140-155.
68. Mutz, D. C., Sniderman, P., & Brody, R. (1996). Political persuasion: The birth of a field of study. In D. Mutz, P. Sniderman, & R. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 1-14). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
69. Neblo, M. (2005). Thinking through democracy: Between the theory and practice of deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40, 169-181.
70. O'Neill, S. (1997). Impartiality in context: Grounding justice in a pluralist world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
71. Pearce, W. B., & Cronen, V. E. (1980). Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger.
72. Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A. (2004). Taking a communication perspective on dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 39-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Price, V. (1992). Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74. Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politic (pp. 93-130). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Rojas, H., Shah, D., Cho, J., Schmierbach, M., Keum, H., & Gil-De-Zuniga, H. (2005). Media dialogue: Perceiving and addressing community problems. Mass Communication and Society, 8, 93-110.
76. Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77. Schudson, M. (1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14, 297-309.
78. Smith, J., & Zipp, J. F. (1983). The party official next door: Some consequences of friendship for political involvement. Journal of Politics, 45, 958-978.
79. Stewart, J., & Zediker, K. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 224-242.
80. Stewart, J., Zediker, K. E., & Black, L. (2004). Relationships among philosophies of dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 21-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81. Tarde, G. (1989). L'opinion et la foule [The opinion and the crowd]. Paris: Presses Universtaires de France. (Original work published 1898)
82. Tracy, K., & Dimock, A. (2004). Meetings: Discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. Communication Yearbook, 28, 127-164.
83. VanLear, A. (1987). The formation of social relationships: A longitudinal study of social penetration. Human Communication Research, 13, 299-322.
84. Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50, 71-92.
86. Wyatt, R. O., Kim, J., & Katz, E. (2000). How feeling free to talk affects ordinary political conversation, purposeful argumentation, and civic participation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 99-114.
87. Young, I. M. (1997). Difference as a resource for democratic communication. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politic (pp. 383-406). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple model of the survey responses: Answering versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 96, 579-616.
90. Zelizer, B. (1993). Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 219-237.