Continuous, online measurement of the absolute plasma refill rate during hemodialysis using feedback regulated ultrafiltration: Preliminary results

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 95-99

  Brummelhuis, Walter J ^a   Van Schelven, Leonard J ^a   Boer, Walther H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALYSIS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; HEMODIALYZERS; HEMOGLOBIN; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATIENT MONITORING; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ANTIEMBOLISM STOCKINGS (AES); BLOOD VOLUME (BV); HYDROXY-ETHYLATED STARCH (HAES);

PLASMA (HUMAN);

HETASTARCH;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRY WEIGHT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MALE; ONLINE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VOLUME; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HEMODIALYSIS SOLUTIONS; HEMOGLOBINS; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RENAL DIALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 38349162275     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181609d91     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Twardowski ZJ: Treatment time and ultrafiltration rate are more important in dialysis prescription than small molecule clearance (Review). Blood Purif 25:90-98, 2007.
2. Lopez Ramon I, Muro B, Azcona M, et al: Influence of postural changes on the variations of blood volume in hemodialysis and reincidence post-dialysis blood volume. An Sist Sanit Navar 20:89-94, 1997.
3. Lopot F: Clinical use of continuous blood volume monitoring. EDTNA ERCA J 22: 7-11, 1996.
4. Schroeder KL, Sallustio JE, Ross EA: Continuous haematocrit monitoring during intradialytic hypotension: Precipitous decline in plasma refill rates. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 652-656, 2004.
5. Mancini E, Santoro A, Spongano M, et al: Continuous on-line optical absorbance recording of blood volume changes during hemodialysis. Artif Organs 17: 691-694, 1993.
6. Dasselaar JJ, Lub-de Hooge MN, Pruim J, et al: Relative blood volume changes underestimate total blood volume changes during hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 669-674, 2007.
7. Cutler BS, Daggett WM: Application of the "G-suit" to the control of hemorrhage in massive trauma. Ann Surg 173: 511-514, 1971.
8. Kimme P, Jannsen B, Ledin T, et al: High incidence of pruritus after large doses of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) infusions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45: 686-689, 2001.
9. Ring J, Messmer K: Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet 1: 466-469, 1977.
10. Chen G, Yan M, Lu QH, Gong M: Effects of two different hydroxyethyl starch solutions (HES200/0.5 vs. HES130/0.4) on the expression of platelet membrane glycoprotein. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50: 1089-1094, 2006.
11. Wizemann V, Schilling M: Dilemma of assessing volume state - The use and the limitations of a clinical score. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10: 2114-2117, 1995.
12. Ishibe S, Peixoto AJ: Methods of assessment of volume status and intercompartmental fluid shifts in hemodialysis patients: Implications in clinical practice. Semin Dial 17: 37-43, 2004.
13. Sarkar SR, Kotanko P, Levin NW: Interdialytic weight gain: Implications in hemodialysis patients. Semin Dial 19: 429-433, 2006.
14. Mitra S, Chamney P, Greenwood R, Farrington K: Linear decay of relative blood volume during ultrafiltration predicts hemodynamic instability. Am J Kidney Dis 40: 556-565, 2002.