Politics, public opinion, and project design in california road pricing

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1996, 2007, Pages 41-48

  Smirti, Megan ^a   Evans, Alexandra ^b   Gougherty, Michael ^a   Morris, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DECISION MAKING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

PRICING PROJECTS; PROJECT DESIGN; PUBLIC OPINION; ROAD PRICING;

ROADS AND STREETS;

EID: 38349152734     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1996-06     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Whittles, M. J. Urban Road Pricing: Public and Political Acceptability. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hants, United Kingdom, 2003, pp. 46-47.
2. Perez, B. G., and G. Sciara. A Guide for HOT Lane Development. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003. http://www.its.dot.gov/ JPODOCS/REPTS_TE/13668.html. Accessed Feb. 25, 2006.
3. Southbound I-680 Smart Lane Project Map Page. Sunol Smart Carpool Joint Powers Agency, http://www.680smartlane.org/map.html. Accessed July 27,2006.
4. Supernak, J., C. Kaschade, D. Steffey, and G. Kubiak. Phase II Year Three Traffic Study: 1-15 Congestion Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services. San Diego State University, Calif., 2001. http://argo.sandag.org/ fastrak/pdfs/yr3_traffic.pdf. Accessed Feb. 25, 2006.
5. Hölzer, O. Success and Failure: Experiences from Cities. In Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies (J. Schade and B. Schlag, eds.), Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 2003, pp. 219-234.
6. Sullivan, E. Continuation Study to Evaluate the Impacts of the SR-91 Value-Priced Express Lanes: Final Report. California Department of Transportation, 2000. http://ceenve.calpoly.edu/sullivan/SR91/final_rpt/ FinalRep2000.pdf. Accessed Feb. 25, 2006.
7. Frick, K. T., S. Heminger, and H. Dittmar. Bay Bridge Congestion-Pricing Project: Lessons Learned to Date. In Transportation Research Record 1558, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 29-38.