Compressible streamlines and three-phase history matching

SPE Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 475-485

  Cheng, Hao ^a,b   Oyerinde, Dayo ^a   Datta Gupta, Akhil ^a   Milliken, William ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

COMPRESSIBLE STREAMLINES; SATURATION EQUATION; THREE-PHASE FLOW; THREE-PHASE HISTORY MATCHING;

MULTIPHASE FLOW;

EID: 38349144896     PISSN: 1086055X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/99465-PA     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anterion, F., Eymard, R., and Karcher, B. 1989. Use of Parameter Gradients for Reservoir History Matching. Paper SPE 18433 presented at the SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, Houston, 6-8 February. DOI: 10.2118/18433-MS.
2. Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
3. Clayton V. and Journel, A.G. 1997. Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. London: Oxford University Press.
4. Datta-Gupta, A et al. 2001. Strealines, Ray Tracing and Production Tomography: Generalization to Compressible Flow. Petroleum Geoscience 5: 75-86.
5. He, Z., Yoon, S., and Datta-Gupta, A. 2002. Streamline-Based Production Data Integration With Gravity and Changing Field Conditions. SPEJ 7 (4): 423-436. SPE-71333-PA. DOI: 10.2118/71333-PA.
6. Killough, J.E. 1995. Ninth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Reexamination of th Black-Oil Simulation. Paper SPE 29110 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 12-15 February, DOI: 10.2118/29110-MS.
7. Landa, J.L., Kamal, M.M., Jenkins, C.D., and Home, R.N., 1996. Reservoir Characterization Constrained to Well Test Data: A Field Example. Paper SPE 36511 presented the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October. DOI: 10.2118/36511-MS.
8. Oliver, D.S. 1994. Incorporation of Transient Pressure Data Into Reservoir Characterization. In Situ 18 (3): 243-275.
9. Reis, L.C., Hu, L.Y., and Eschard, R. 2000. Production Data Intergration Using a Gradual Deformation Approach: Application to an Oil Field (Offshore Brazil). Paper SPE 63064 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October. DOI: 10.2118/63064-MS.
10. Sahni, I. and Home, R. 2005. Multiresolution Wavelet Analysis for Improved Reservoir Description. SPEREE 8 (1): 53-69. SPE-87820-PA. DOI: 10.2118/87820-PA.
11. Stone, H.L. 1973. Estimation of Three-Phase Relative Permeability and Residual Oil Data. JCPT 12 (4): 53-61.
12. Vasco, D.W., Yoon, S., and Datta-Gupta, A. 1999. Integrating Dynamic Data Into High-Resolution Reservoir Models Using Streamline-Based Analytic Sensitivity Coefficients. SPEJ 4 (4): 389-399. SPE-49002-PA. DOI: 10.2118/49002-PA.
13. Vega, L., Rojas, D., and Datta-Gupta, A. 2004. Scalability of the Deterministic and Bayesian Approaches to Production-Data Integration Into Reservoir Models. SPEJ 9 (3): 330-338. SPE-88961-PA. DOI: 10.2118/88961-PA.
14. Wang, Y. and Kovscek, A.R. 2000. A Streamline Approach for History Matching Production Data. Paper SPE 59370 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April. DOI: 10.2118/59370-MS.
15. Wu, Z., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver, D.S. 1999. Conditioning Geostatistical Models to Two-Phase Production Data. SPEJ 4 (2): 142-155. SPE-56855-PA. DOI: 10.2118/56855-PA.