Extending the simple knowledge organization system for concept management in vocabulary development applications

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 25-37

  Tennis, Joseph T ^a   Sutton, Stuart A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIMPLE KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION SYSTEM (SKOS); VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS (VDA);

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; METADATA; SEMANTIC WEB;

VOCABULARY CONTROL;

EID: 38349138485     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20702     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, J.D., & Perez-Carballo, J. (2005). Information retrieval design. St. Petersburg, FL: Ometeca Institute.
2. Dalhberg (1979). On the theory of the concept. In Neelameghan (Ed.), Ordering systems for global information networks (pp. 54-63). Bangalore, India: International Federation for Documentation.
3. Dewey, J. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library.
4. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things. New York: Random House.
6. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton, England: Harvester.
7. Hillmann, D.I., Sutton, S.A., Phipps, J., & Laundry, R.J. (2006). A metadata registry from vocabularies up: The NSDL Registry Project. DC-2006 Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata for Knowledge and Learning (pp. 65-75). Manzanillo, Mexico.
8. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) Section on Cataloging. (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. Retrieved November 26, 2006, from http://www.ifla.org/ VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf
9. Lancaster, F.W. (2003). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
10. Library of Congress. (2005). MARC 21 concise format for classification data. Retrieved November 26, 2006, from http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/
11. Mikhalenko, P. (2005, June). Introducing SKOS. Available at: O'Reilly XML.com. Retrieved November 26, 2006, from http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/06/22/ skos.html
12. Miles, A. (2006). SKOS requirements for standardization. DC-2006 Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata for Knowledge and Learning (pp. 55-64). Manzanillo, Mexico.
13. Miles, A., & Brickley, D. (Eds.). (2005a, November). SKOS core guide: W3C Working Draft. Retrieved November 26, 2006, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/ WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102/
14. Miles, A., & Brickley, D. (Eds.). (2005b, November). SKOS core vocabulary specification W3C Working Draft. Retrieved November 26, 2006, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-spec-20051102/
15. Preschel, B.M. (1972). Indexer consistency in perception of concepts and in choice of terminology. New York: Columbia University School of Library Service.
16. Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Smiraglia, R.P. (2001). Works as signs, symbols, and canons: The epistemology of the work. Knowledge Organization, 28(4), 192-202.
18. Soergel, D. (1974). Indexing languages and thesauri: Construction and maintenance. Los Angeles: Melvile.
19. Tennis, J.T. (2005). SKOS and the ontogenesis of vocabularies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Vocabularies in Practice (pp. 275-78). Madrid, Spain.
20. Tinker, J.F. (1966). Imprecision in indexing. American Documentation, 17, 93-102.
21. UDCC (2003). Master reference file: Manual. The Hague, The Netherlands: UDCC.
22. Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley: University of California Press.