Tailoring and introduction of the rational unified process

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4764 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 7-18

  Hanssen, Geir Kjetil ^a,b   Bjørnson, Finn Olav ^b   Westerheim, Hans ^a  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Method adoption; Method tailoring; Rational unified process; Software development process

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROGRAM PROCESSORS;

METHOD ADOPTION; METHOD TAILORING; RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 38349135202     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75381-0_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. In: Booch, G., Jacobson, I., Rumbaugh, J. (eds.) Object Technology Series, p. 463. Addison Wesley Longman Inc., Reading, Massachusetts (1999)
2. Hanssen, G.K., Westerheim, H., Bjørnson, F.O.: Tailoring RUP to a defined project type: A case study. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) PROFES 2005. LNCS, vol. 3547, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
3. Hanssen, G.K., Westerheim, H., Bjørnson, F.O.: Using Rational Unified Process in an SME - A Case Study. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement. LNCS, vol. 3792, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
4. Westerheim, H., Hanssen, G. K.: The Introduction and Use of a Tailored Unified Process -A Case Study. In: Euromicro 2005, Porto, Portugal (2005)
5. Westerheim, H., Hanssen, G.K.: Extending the Rational Unified Process with a User Experience Discipline: a Case Study. In: Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement. LNCS, vol. 4257, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
6. Bergström, S., Räberg, L.: Adopting the Rational Unified Process, pp. 165-182. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)
7. Kroll, P., Krachten, P.: The Rational Unified Process Made Easy - A Practitionare's Guide to the RUP, ed. O.T. Series. Addison Wesley, Reading (2003)
8. Rational PEP. Available from: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/ docview.wss?uid=swg21158199
9. Merriam-Webster dictionary
10. ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Verhoef, T.F.: On the feasibility of situational method engineering. Information Systems Journal 22(6), 401-422 (1997)
11. Brinkkemper, S.: Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology 38(4), 275-280 (1996)
12. Edwards, H.M., Barrie Thompson, J., Hardy, C.J.: Developing situationally specific methods through stakeholder collaboration. In: COMPSAC. Computer Software and Applications Conference (1998)
13. Riemenschneider, C.K., Hardgrave, B.C., Davis, F.D.: Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of methodologies: a Comparison of Five Theoretical Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(12), 1135 (10) (2002)
14. Avison, D., et al.: Action Research. Communications of the ACM 42(1), 94 (4) (1999)
15. Birk, A., Dingsøyr, T., Stålhane, T.: Postmortem: Never Leave a Project without It. IEEE Software 19(3), 43-45 (2002)
16. Seaman, C.B.: Qualitative methods in empirical studies in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4), 557-572 (1999)
17. Westerheim, H., Dingsøyr, T., Hanssen, G.K.: Studying the User Experience Discipline extension of the Rational Unified Process and its effects on Usability - The design of a case study. In: Bunse, C., Jedlitschka, A. (eds.) Empirical Studies in Software Engineering: Proceedings from the first international workshop, December 2002, pp. 69-74. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Rovaniemi, Finland (2002)
18. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University and Empirical Software Engineering National ICT Australia Ltd. p. 33 (2004)
19. Dybå, T., Moe, N.B., Mikkelsen, E.M.: An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting Software Developer Acceptance and Utilization of Electronic Process Guides. In: METRICS 2004, Chicago, USA (2004)
20. Folkestad, H., Pilskog, E., Tessem, B.: Effects of Software Process in Organization Development - A Case Study. In: Melnik, G., Holz, H. (eds.) LSO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3096, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
21. Bygstad, B.: Controlling Iterative Software Development Projects: The Challenge of Stakeholder and Technical Integration. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA (2004)
22. Cockburn, A.: Agile Software Development. In: Cockburn, A.H.J, (ed.) The Agile Software Development Series, Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)
23. Jacobson, I., Ng, P.W., Spence, I.: The Essential Unified Process - a Fresh New Start (2006)
24. Agile Manifesto, http://www.agilemanifesto.org/
25. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline - A Guide for the Perplexed, p. 266. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)