Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments

Communication Theory

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-116

  Black, Laura W ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 38349132984     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Arnett, R. C. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber's dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
3. Arnett, R. C. (1992). Dialogic education: Conversation about ideas and between persons. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
4. Barge, J. K. (2002). Enlarging the meaning of group deliberation: From discussion to dialogue. In L. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 159-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Barge, J. K., & Little, M. (2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life. Communication Theory, 12, 375-397.
6. Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59-88.
8. Beach, W. A., & Japp, P. (1983). Storifying as time-traveling: The knowledgeable use of temporally structured discourse. Communication Yearbook, 7, 867-888.
9. Black, L. W. (2005). Building connection while thinking together: By-products of employee training in dialogue. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 273-292.
10. Black, L. W. (2006). Deliberation, difference, and the story: How storytelling manages identity and conflict in deliberative groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
11. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. New York: Routledge.
12. Bohman, J. (1995). Public reason and cultural pluralism: Political liberalism and the problem of moral conflict. Political Theory, 23, 253-279.
13. Bormann, E. G. (1996). Symbolic convergence theory and communication in group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (2nd ed., pp. 81-113). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Briggs, C. (1996). Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man (M. Friedman, Ed.; R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: MacMillan.
17. Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Scribner.
18. Buber, M. (1998). The knowledge of man: Selected essays (M. Friedman, Ed.; M. Friedman & R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Humanity Books.
19. Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
20. Chasin, R., Herzig, M., Roth, S., Chasin, L., Becker, C., & Stains, R. R., Jr. (1996). From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy. Mediation Quarterly, 13, 323-344.
21. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8, 63-104.
22. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (2002). Moments of meeting: Buber, Rogers, and the potential for public dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Cohen, J. (1996). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 95-119). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. F. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67-91). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Crosby, N. (1995). Citizen juries: One solution for difficult environmental questions. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
26. Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of "otherness." In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Ellinor, L., & Gerard, G. (1998). Dialogue: Rediscover the transforming power of conversation. New York: Wiley.
28. Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1-22.
29. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision making, and communication. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
33. Gastil, J., Black, L. W., Deess, P., & Leighter, J. (2008). From group member to democratic citizen: How deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes. Human Communication Research, 34, 137-169.
34. Gastil, J., & Keith, W. M. (2005). A nation that (sometimes) likes to talk: A brief history of public deliberation in the United States. In J. Gastil & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century (pp. 3-19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Gastil, J. & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1983). Narratives of the self. In T. R. Sarbin & K. E. Scheibe (Eds.), Studies in social identity (pp. 254-273). New York: Praeger.
37. Gergen, K. J., McNamee, S., & Barrett, F. J. (2002). Realizing transformative dialogue. In N. C. Roberts (Ed.), Research in public policy analysis and management: Vol. 12. The transformative power of dialogue (pp. 77-106). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
38. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 18, 247-266.
39. Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56 (Suppl. 1), S163-S183.
40. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
41. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1995). Moral disagreement in a democracy. In E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller, & J. Paul (Eds.), Contemporary political and social philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 21-30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Hammond, S. C., Anderson, R., & Cissna, K. N. (2003). The problematics of dialogue and power. Communication Yearbook, 27, 125-158.
44. Hannerz, U. (1969). Soulside: Inquiries into ghetto culture and community. New York: Columbia University Press.
45. Hansen, C. D., & Kahnweiler, W. M. (1997). Executive managers: Cultural expectations through stories about work. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 6, 117-138.
46. Herzig, M. (1998). Starting a new conversation: When debate is fruitless, shifting to dialogue can create a climate for resolution. Dispute Resolution Magazine, Summer, pp. 10-13.
47. Hseih, E. (2004). Stories in action and the dialogic management of identities: Storytelling in transplant support group meetings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 39-70.
48. Hyde, B., & Bineham, J. L. (2000). Southern Communication Journal, 65, 208-223.
49. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. New York: Currency.
50. Janis, I. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological studies of political decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
51. Jefferson, G. (1979). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219-248). New York: Academic Press.
52. Johnson, S. C., & Long, L. M. (2002). "Being a part and being apart": Dialectics and group communication. In L. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 25-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Kellet, P. (1999). Dialogue and dialectics in managing organizational change: The case of a mission-based transformation. Southern Communication Journal, 64, 211-231.
54. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
55. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays in the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
56. Lamerichs, J., & Te Molder, H. F. M. (2003). Computer mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society, 5, 451-473.
57. Langillier, K. M. (1989). Personal narratives: Perspectives on theory and research. Text and Performance Quarterly, 9, 243-276.
58. Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Interpersonal activities in conversational storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 114-126.
60. Meyer, J. C. (1995). Tell me a story: Eliciting organizational values from narratives. Communication Quarterly, 43, 210-224.
61. Norrick, N. R. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
62. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19-43.
63. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A. (2000). Combining passions and abilities: Toward dialogic virtuosity. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 161-175.
65. Philipsen, G. (1997). A theory of speech codes. In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 119-156). Albany: State University of New York Press.
66. Polanyi, L. (1985). Conversational storytelling. In T. A Van Dijk. (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue (pp. 183-202). London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
67. Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16, 47-74.
69. Ryfe, D. M. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication, 19, 359-377.
70. Ryfe, D. M. (2006). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 72-93.
71. Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347-376.
72. Schiffrin, D. (1990). The management of co-operative self during argument: The role of opinions and stories. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversation (pp. 241-259). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73. Smith, K. K. (1998). Storytelling, sympathy, and moral judgment in American abolitionism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 356-377.
74. Stewart, J. (1978). Foundations of dialogic communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 183-201.
75. Stewart, J. R., & Zediker, K. E. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 224-242.
76. Taylor, J. R. (2004). Dialogue as the search for sustainable organizational co-orientation. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 125-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford.
78. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
79. Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120-135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.