Does Previous Percutaneous Coronary Stenting Compromise the Long-Term Efficacy of Subsequent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery? A Microsimulation Study

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 501-507

  Rao, Christopher ^a   Stanbridge, Rex De Lisle ^b   Chikwe, Joanna ^c   Pepper, John ^d   Skapinakis, Petros ^e   Aziz, Omer ^a   Darzi, Ara ^a   Athanasiou, Thanos ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d NATIONAL HEART AND LUNG INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY STENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVASCULARIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SURVIVAL TIME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 38349118034     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.036     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Guyton R.A. Coronary artery bypass is superior to drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 1949-1957
2. Aziz O., Rao C., Panesar S.S., et al. Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery. BMJ 334 (2007) 617
3. SoS Investigators. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360 (2002) 965-970
4. Serruys P.W., Ong A.T.L., van Herwerden L.A., et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 575-581
5. Rodriguez A.E., Baldi J., Fernández Pereira C., et al. Five-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II). J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 582-588
6. Hoffman S.N., TenBrook Jr. J.A., Wolf M.P., Pauker S.G., Salem D.N., and Wong J.B. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (2003) 1293-1304
7. Brener S.J., Lytle B.W., Casserly I.P., Schneider J.P., Topol E.J., and Lauer M.S. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation 109 (2004) 2290-2295
8. Hannan E.L., Racz M.J., Walford G., et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 352 (2005) 2174-2183
9. Malenka D.J., Leavitt B.J., Hearne M.J., et al. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in Northern New England. Circulation 112 suppl I (2005) I371-I376
10. Rao C., Aziz O., Panesar S.S., et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery. BMJ 334 (2007) 621
11. Yock C.A., Boothroyd D.B., Owens D.K., Garber A.M., and Hlatky M.A. Cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery versus stenting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Am J Med 115 (2003) 382-389
12. Griffin S.C., Barber J.A., Manca A., et al. Cost effectiveness of clinically appropriate decisions on alternative treatments for angina pectoris: prospective observational study. BMJ 334 (2007) 624
13. Thielmann M., Neuhäuser M., Knipp S., et al. Prognostic impact of previous percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus and triple-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134 (2007) 470-476
14. Cutlip D.E., Chhabra A.G., Baim D.S., et al. Beyond restenosis: five-year clinical outcomes from second-generation coronary stent trials. Circulation 110 (2004) 1226-1230
15. Keogh B. Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report. In: Keogh B., and Kinsman R. (Eds). Fifth National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report 2003: improving outcomes for patients (2004), Dendrite Clinical Systems, Henley-on-Thames 352
16. Thielmann M., Leyh R., Massoudy P., et al. Prognostic significance of multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 114 (2006) 441-444
17. Nashef S.A., Roques F., Michel P., Gauducheau E., Lemeshow S., and Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 (1999) 9-13
18. Nilsson J., Algotsson L., Hoglund P., Luhrs C., and Brandt J. Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 867-874
19. Hill R., Bagust A., Bakhai A., et al. Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 8 (2004) iii-iv 1-242
20. Puvimanasinghe J.P., Takkenberg J.J., Edwards M.B., et al. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation. Heart 90 (2004) 1172-1178
21. Puvimanasinghe J.P., Takkenberg J.J., Eijkemans M.J., et al. Choice of a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis for AVR: does CABG matter?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23 (2003) 688-695
22. Puvimanasinghe J.P., Takkenberg J.J., Eijkemans M.J., et al. Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29 (2006) 374-379
23. Puvimanasinghe J.P., Takkenberg J.J., Eijkemans M.J., et al. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: use of microsimulation. Ann Thorac Surg 80 (2005) 825-831
24. Petitti D.B. Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. 2nd ed. (2000), Oxford University Press, New York, NY 154-155
25. Interim Life Tables (2006), Office for National Statistics, London
26. Kind P., Brooks R., and Rabin R. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history (2005), Springer Science, New York 1-17
27. Szende A., and Williams A. Measuring self reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D (2004), Euroqol Group, Rotterdam
28. National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2004 Guide to the Technology Appraisal Process (2004), Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford 26
29. Drummond M.F., Sculpher M.J., Torrance G.W., O'Brien B.J., and Stoddard G.L. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford 301-307
30. Gaudino M., Cellini C., Pragliola C., et al. Arterial versus venous bypass grafts in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation 112 (2005) I265-I269
31. Gao G., Wu Y., Grunkemeier G.L., Furnary A.P., and Starr A. Long-term survival of patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: comparison of the pre-stent and post-stent eras. Ann Thorac Surg 82 (2006) 806-810
32. Vicenzi M.N., Meislitzer T., Heitzinger B., Halaj M., Fleisher L.A., and Metzler H. Coronary artery stenting and non-cardiac surgery-a prospective outcome study. Br J Anaesth 96 (2006) 686-693
33. Gomes W.J., and Buffolo E. Coronary stenting and inflammation: implications for further surgical and medical treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 1918-1925
34. Gomes W.J., Giannotti-Filho O., Paez R.P., Hossne Jr. N.A., Catani R., and Buffolo E. Coronary artery and myocardial inflammatory reaction induced by intracoronary stent. Ann Thorac Surg 76 (2003) 1528-1532
35. Caramori P.R., Lima V.C., Seidelin P.H., Newton G.E., Parker J.D., and Adelman A.G. Long-term endothelial dysfunction after coronary artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 34 (1999) 1675-1679
36. Chikwe J., Athanasiou T., Collins P., and Pepper J.R. Safety and efficacy concerns regarding elective coronary artery surgery in patients with prior coronary stents. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 1265
37. Westaby S., Channon K., and Banning A. To stent or not to stent?. A sterile debate. BMJ 355 (2007) 111
38. Healthcare Commission. National service framework report-Getting to the heart of it, Coronary heart disease in England: a review of progress towards the national standards (2005), Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London 109-112
39. Taggart D.P. Editorial: Coronary revascularisation. BMJ 334 (2007) 593-594