Comparison of automated pavement distress data collection procedures for local agencies in San Francisco Bay Area, California

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1990, 2007, Pages 119-126

  Albitres, Carlos M Chang ^a   Smith, Roger E ^b   Pendleton, Olga J ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDITION MONITORING; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; MAINTENANCE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX; PAVEMENT DISTRESS; PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE;

PAVEMENTS;

EID: 38349115029     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1990-14     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benson, K. R., G. E. Elkins, W. Uddin, and W. R. Hudson. Comparison of Methods and Equipment to Conduct Pavement Distress Surveys. In Transportation Research Record 1196, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 40-50.
2. Moore, R. K., G. N. Clarks, and A. J. Gisi. Comparison of Pavement Surface Distress Measurement Systems. In Transportation Research Record 1410, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 11-18.
3. Cable, J. K., and V. J. Marks. Automated Pavement Distress Data Collection Equipment Seminar. FHWA-TS-90-053. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, 1990.
4. Del Río, J., and R. E. Smith. Automated Distress Survey Procedures for Use with the Bay Area Pavement Management System. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 1991.
5. Lee, H. Accuracy, Precision, Repeatability, and Compatibility of the Pavedex PAS 1 Automated Distress Measuring Device. In Transportation Research Record 1311, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 136-143.
6. Test and Evaluation Project No. 21, Automated Pavement Distress Survey Equipment. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2003.
7. Smith, R. E., T. J. Freeman, and O. J. Pendleton. Evaluation of Automated Pavement Distress Data Collection Procedures for Local Agency Pavement Management. Washington Department of Transportation, Olympia, and Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 1996.
8. Bursanescu, L., and F. Biais. Automated Pavement Distress Data Collection and Analysis: A 3D Approach. G.I.E. Technologies, National Research Council of Canada, and Institute for Information Technology, Ontario, Canada, 1997.
9. Smadi, O., B. McWaters, K. Jones, R. Gumbert, R. Kraul, and T. Maze. Selection of Automated Pavement Distress Evaluation Technology: Iowa DOT Case Study. Iowa State University, Ames, 1997.
10. Key Findings from LTPP Distress Data. FHWA-RD-02-031. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
11. McGhee, K. NCHRP Synthesis 334: Automated Pavement Distress Collection Techniques. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
12. Chang, C., R. E. Smith, and O. J. Pendleton. Comparison of Automated Pavement Distress Data Collection Procedures for Local Agencies. Presented at First Annual Inter-University Symposium on Infrastructure Management, Waterloo, Canada, 2005.
13. Mullis, C., N. Shippen, E. Brooks, and J. Reid. Automated Data Collection Equipment for Monitoring Highway Condition. Final Report SPR 322. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2005.
14. Pavement Condition Index Distress Identification Manual for Asphalt and Surface Treatment Pavement, 3rd ed. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 2002.
15. StreetSaver v.8 Computer User's Guide. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 2003.
16. Bay Area Pavement Management System (PMS) User's Guide. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 1988.