Nitrogen and light affect the adaptive traits of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)

Weed Science

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 81-90

  Mahoney, Kris J ^b   Swanton, Clarence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Morphology; Phenology; Photosynthetic photon flux density; Reaction norms; Red to far red ratio

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; LIGHT EFFECT; MORPHOLOGY; NITROGEN; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; PHENOLOGY; PHOTON FLUX DENSITY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SEED PRODUCTION; SURVIVAL; WEED;

CHENOPODIUM ALBUM;

EID: 38349096747     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-07-086.1     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aphalo, P. J. and T. Lehto. 1997. Effects of light quality on growth and N accumulation in birch seedlings. Tree Physiol. 17:125-132.
2. Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:1-24.
3. Ballaré, C. L., R. A. Sánchez, A. L. Scopel, J. J. Casal, and C. M. Ghersa. 1987. Early detection of neighbour plants by phytochrome perception of spectral changes in reflected sunlight. Plant Cell Environ. 10:551-557.
4. 2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 121:183-192.
5. 4 weed species through sucrose supplementation. J. Exp. Bot. 53:1935-1940.
6. Bertero, H. D. 2001. Effects of photoperiod, temperature and radiation on the fate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under field conditions. Ann. Bot. 71:495-502.
7. Booth, B. D., S. D. Murphy, and C. J. Swanton. 2004. Invasive ecology of weeds in agricultural systems. Pages 29-45 in Inderjit, ed. Weed Biology and Management. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
8. Booth, B. D. and C. J. Swanton. 2002. Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci. 50:2-13.
9. Bowley, S. R. 1999. Regression in ANOVA. Pages 89-90 in A Hitchhikers Guide to Statistics in Plant Biology. 1st ed. Guelph, ON, Canada: Plants et al.
10. Brainard, D. C., R. R. Bellinder, and A. DiTommaso. 2005. Effects of canopy shade on the morphology, phenology, and seed characteristics of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii). Weed Sci. 53:175-186.
11. Callahan, H. S. and M. Pigliucci. 2002. Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 83:1965-1980.
12. Causin, H. F. 2004. Responses to shading in Chenopodium album: the effect of the maternal environment and the N source supplied. Can. J. Bot. 82:1371-1381.
13. Causin, H. F. and R. D. Wulff. 2003. Changes in the responses to light quality during ontogeny in Chenopodium album. Can. J. Bot. 81:152-163.
14. Child, R., D. C. Morgan, and H. Smith. 1981. Control of development in Chenopodium album L. by shadelight: the effect of light quality (red:far-red ratio) on morphogenesis. New Phytol. 89:545-555.
15. Colquhoun, J., C. M. Boerboom, L. K. Binning, D. E. Stoltenburg, and J. M. Norman. 2001. Common lambsquarters photosynthesis and seed production in three environments. Weed Sci. 49:334-339.
16. Dharmakeerthi, R. S., B. D. Kay, and E. G. Beauchamp. 2004. Effect of disturbance on N availability across a variable landscape in southern Ontario. Soil Tillage Res. 79:101-112.
17. Dharmakeerthi, R. S., B. D. Kay, and E. G. Beauchamp. 2005. Factors contributing to changes in plant available N across a variable landscape. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69:453-462.
18. Dharmakeerthi, R. S., B. D. Kay, and E. G. Beauchamp. 2006. Spatial variability of in-season nitrogen uptake by corn across a variable landscape as affected by management. Agron. J. 98:255-264.
19. Elena, S. F. and J.A.G.M. de Visser. 2003. Environmental stress and the effects of mutation. J. Biol. 2:12.
20. Fawcett, R. S. and F. W. Slife. 1978. Effects of field applications of nitrate on weed seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26:594-596.
21. Gedroc, J. J., K.D.M. McConnaughay, and J. S. Coleman. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Funct. Ecol. 10:44-50.
22. Ghorbani, R., P. C. Scheepens, W.V.D. Zweerde, C. Leifert, A.J.S. McDonald, and W. Seel. 2002. Effects of nitrogen availability and spore concentration on the biocontrol activity of Ascochyta caulina in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci. 50:628-633.
23. Grime, J. P. 1974. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250:26-31.
24. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111:1169-1194.
25. Gupta, A. P. and R. C. Lewontin. 1982. A study of reaction norms in natural populations of Drosophila psuedoobscura. Evolution 36:934-948.
26. Harbur, M. M. and M.D.K. Owen. 2004. Light and growth rate effects on crop and weed responses to nitrogen. Weed Sci. 52:578-583.
27. 2 and nitrogen, but not population density, alter the size and C/N ratio of Phytolacca americana seeds. Funct. Ecol. 19:437-444.
28. Hikosaka, K. 2004. Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis- nitrogen relationship: patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance. J. Plant Res. 117:481-494.
29. Hikosaka, K., Y. T. Hanba, T. Hirose, and I. Terashima. 1998. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in leaves of woody and herbaceous species. Funct. Ecol. 12:896-905.
30. Hikosaka, K. and I. Terashima. 1996. Nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components and its consequence in sun and shade plants. Funct. Ecol. 10:335-343.
31. Holmes, M. G. and H. Smith. 1975. The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. Nature 254:512-514.
32. Holmes, M. G. and H. Smith. 1977. The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. IV. Light quality and plant development. Photochem. Photobiol. 25:551-557.
33. Huang, J. Z., A. Shrestha, M. Tollenaar, W. Deen, H. Rahimian, and C. J. Swanton. 2001. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the phenological development of common lambsquarters. Weed Sci. 49:500-508.
34. Hughes, J. E., L. Heathcote, K. Bambridge, and C. R. Black. 1984. A growth cabinet providing variable spectral photon distribution at high fluence rates. New Phytol. 98:211-219.
35. Kato, M. C., K. Hikosaka, and T. Hirose. 2002. Photoinactivation and recovery of photosystem II in Chenopodium album leaves grown at different levels of irradiance and nitrogen availability. Funct. Plant Biol. 29:787-795.
36. Khattak, A. M., S. Pearson, and C. B. Johnson. 1999. The effect of spectral filters and nitrogen dose on the growth of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat., cv. Snowdon). J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 74:206-212.
37. 2 and light environment on growth and reproductive performance of four annual species. New Phytol. 144:455-462.
38. Lemaire, G. and P. Millard. 1999. An ecophysiological approach to modelling resource fluxes in competing plants. J. Exp. Bot. 50:15-28.
39. Mahoney, K. J. 2006. Influence of Light Quality on Common Lambsquarters Adaptive Strategies. Ph.D dissertation. Guelph, ON, Canada: University of Guelph. 160 p.
40. McConnaughay, K.D.M. and J. S. Coleman. 1998. Can plants track changes in nutrient availability via changes in biomass partitioning? Plant Soil 202:201-209.
41. McConnaughay, K.D.M. and J. S. Coleman. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny of optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581-2593.
42. McCullough, D. E., P. Girardin, M. Mihajlovic, A. Aguilera, and M. Tollenaar. 1994. Influence of N supply on development and dry matter accumulation of an old and a new maize hybrid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:471-477.
43. McLachlan, S. M., M. Tollenaar, C. J. Swanton, and S. F. Weise. 1993. Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Weed Sci. 41:568-573.
44. Mercer, K. L., N. R. Jordan, D. L. Wyse, and R. G. Shaw. 2002. Multivariate differentiation of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) from three farming systems. Weed Sci. 50:677-685.
45. Morgan, D. C. and H. Smith. 1976. Linear relationship between phytochrome photoequilibrium and growth in plants under simulated natural radiation. Nature 262:210-212.
46. Morgan, D. C. and H. Smith. 1978. The relationship between phytochrome photoequilibrium and development in light grown Chenopodium album L. Planta 142:187-193.
47. Morgan, D. C. and H. Smith. 1979. A systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta 145:253-258.
48. Morgan, D. C. and H. Smith. 1981. Control of development in Chenopodium album L. by shadelight: the effect of light quality (total fluence rate) and light quality (red:far-red ratio). New Phytol. 88:239-248.
49. Mulugeta, D. and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1998. Influence of cohorts on Chenopodium album demography. Weed Sci. 46:65-70.
50. Nicotra, A. B. and N. L. Rodenhouse. 1995. Intraspecific competition in Chenopodium album varies with resource availability. Am. Midl. Nat. 134:90-98.
51. Oguchi, R., K. Hikosaka, and T. Hirose. 2003. Does the photosynthetic light-acclimation need change in leaf anatomy? Plant Cell Environ. 26:505-512.
52. Osone, Y. and M. Tateno. 2005. Applicability and limitations of optimal biomass allocation models: a test of two species from fertile and infertile habitats. Ann. Bot. 95:1211-1220.
53. 2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27:595-607.
54. Rajcan, I., M. A. Alikhani, C. J. Swanton, and M. Tollenaar. 2002. Development of redroot pigweed is influenced by light spectral quality and quantity. Crop Sci. 42:1930-1936.
55. Röhrig, M. and H. Stützel. 2001. Dry matter production and partitioning of Chenopodium album in contrasting competitive environments. Weed Res. 41:129-142.
56. 4 plants. I. Leaf nitrogen, growth, and biomass partitioning in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiol. 84:954-958.
57. 4 plants. III. Leaf nitrogen effects on the activity of carboxylating enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiol. 84:355-359.
58. Saini, H. S., P. K. Bassi, and M. S. Spencer. 1985. Seed germination in Chenopodium album L. : further evidence for the dependence of the effects of growth regulators on nitrate availability. Plant Cell Environ. 8:707-711.
59. Scharf, P. C., N. R. Kitchen, K. A. Sudduth, J. G. Davis, V. C. Hubbard, and J. A. Lory. 2005. Field-scale variability in optimal nitrogen fertilizer rate for corn. Agron. J. 97:452-461.
60. Schmitt, J., J. R. Stinchcombe, M. S. Heschel, and H. Huber. 2003. The adaptive evolution of plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:459-469.
61. Shahandeh, H., A. L. Wright, F. M. Hons, and R. J. Lascano. 2005. Spatial and temporal variation of soil nitrogen parameters related to soil texture and corn yield. Agron. J. 97:772-782.
62. Smith, H. and G. C. Whitelam. 1997. The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ. 30:840-844.
63. Steel, R.G.D., J. H. Torrie, and D. A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 666 p.
64. Stoller, E. W. and R. A. Myers. 1989. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570-574.
65. Tilman, D. 1986. Nitrogen-limited growth in plants from different successional stages. Ecology 67:555-563.
66. Williams, J. T. 1963. Chenopodium album L. J. Ecol. 51:711-725.
67. Wulff, R. D., H. F. Causin, O. Benitez, and P. A. Bacalini. 1999. Intraspecific variability and maternal effects the response to nutrient addition in Chenopodium album. Can. J. Bot. 77:1150-1158.
68. Yano, S. and I. Terashima. 2001. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun and shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Physiol. 42:1303-1310.
69. Yano, S. and I. Terashima. 2004. Developmental process of sun and shade leaves in Chenopodium album L. Plant Cell Environ. 27:781-793.