The smaller arachnid orders: Diversity, descriptions and distributions from Linnaeus to the present (1758 to 2007)

Zootaxa

Volumn , Issue 1668, 2007, Pages 363-380

  Harvey, Mark S ^a  

^a WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

Author keywords

Amblypygi; Arachnida; Opilioacariformes; Palpigradi; Pseudoscorpiones; Richness; Ricinulei; Schizomida; Solifugae; Systematics; Uropygi

Indexed keywords

ACARUS; AMBLYPYGI; ARACHNIDA; ARANEAE; OPILIOACARIFORMES; PALPIGRADI; PHALANGIUM; PSEUDOSCORPIONES; RICINULEI; SCHIZOMIDA; SCORPIONES; SOLIFUGAE; UROPYGI;

EID: 38349085595     PISSN: 11755326     EISSN: 11755334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.19     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Armas, L.F. de (2000) Los vinagrillos de Cuba (Arachnida: Uropygi: Thelyphonidae). Poeyana, 469, 1-10.
2. Armas, L.F. de (2002) Nueva especie de Thelyphonellus (Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae) de La Espanola, Añtillas Mayores. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 5, 39-42.
3. Ballesteros, A. and Prancke, O.F. (2006) Mastigoproctus lacandonensis, especic nucva de vinagrillo (Thelyphonida, Arachnida) de la selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. In: Estrada, V.E.G., Romero N., J., Equihua M., A., Luna L., C. and Rosas A., J. (eds), Entomología Mexicana. Manzanillo, Colima, vol. 5(1), 156-160.
4. Beier, M. (1932) Pseudoscorpionidea II. Subord. C. Cheliferinea. Tierreich, 58, i-xxi. 1-294.
5. Beier, M. (1948) Phoresie und Phagophilie bei Pseudoscorpionen. Österreichische Zoologische Zeitschrift, 1, 441-497.
6. Brignoli, P.M. (1973) Note sulla morfologia dei genitali degli Schizomidi e diagnosi preliminari di due nuove species del Messico (Arachnida, Schizornida). Fragmenta Entnmologica, 9, 1-9.
7. Chamberlin, J.C. (1932) A synoptic revision of the generic classification of the chelonethid family Cheliferidae Simon (Arachnida) (continued). Canadian Entomologist, 64, 17-21, 35-39.
8. Clerck, C. (1758) Svenska spindlar uti sina hufvud-slågter indelte [Aranei Suecici, descriptionibus et figuris illustrati]. L. Salvii, Stockholm.
9. Dunlop, J.A. (1997) Palaeozoic arachnids and their significance for arachnid phylogeny. In: Żabka, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology. Wydawnictwo Wyzszej Skoly Rolniczo-Pedagogicznej, Siedlce, pp. 65-82.
10. Forster, R.R. & Forster, L.M. (1999) Spiders of New Zealand and their worldwide kin. University of Otago Press and Otago Museum, Dunedin.
11. Geoffroy, E.L. (1762) Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris; dans laquelle ces animaux sont rangés suivant un ordre méthodique. Vol. 2. Durand, Paris.
12. Hagen, H. (1867) Untitled. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 11, 323-325.
13. Harvey, M.S. (2002a) Short-range endemism in the Australian fauna: some examples from non-marine environments. Invertebrate Systematics, 16, 555-570.
14. Harvey, M.S. (2002b) The neglected cousins: what do we know about the smaller arachnid orders? Journal of Arachnology, 30, 357-372.
15. Haupt, J. (1996) Revision of East Asian whip scorpions (Arachnida Uropygi Thelyphonida). II. Thailand and adjacent areas. Arthropoda Selecta, 5, 53-65.
16. Haupt, J. (2004) A new species of whipscorpion from Laos (Arachnida: Uropygi: Thelyphonidae). Senckenbergiana biologica, 83, 151-155.
17. Haupt, J. & Song, D. (1996) Revision of East Asian whip scorpions (Arachnida Uropygi Thelyphonida). I. China and Japan. Arthropoda Selecta, 5, 43-52.
18. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1989) Opinion 1542. Chelifer Geoffroy, 1762 (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida): conserved. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 46, 143-144.
19. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature, fourth edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London.
20. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (2004) Opinion 2082. Phrynus ceylonicus C.L. Koch, 1843 (Arachnida, Amblypygi): specific name given precedence over the specific names of Phalangium reniforme Linnaeus, 1758 and Phalangium lunatum Pallas, 1772. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 61, 186-187.
21. Karsch, F. (1879) Ueber eine neue Eintheilung der Tarantuliden (Phrynidae aut.). Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 45, 189-197.
22. Kuntner, M. & Sereg, I. (2002) Additions to the spider fauna of Slovenia, with a comparison of spider species richness among European countries. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, 12, 185-195.
23. Latreille, P.A. (1802) Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes. Vol. 3. F. Dufart, Paris.
24. Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae, 10th edition. Vol. 1. L. Salvii, Holmiae.
25. lis Ludovicae Ulricae reginae Svecorum, Gothorum, Vandalorumque. Holmiae, Stockholm.
26. Linnaeus, C. (1767) Systema naturae, 13th edition. Vol. I. Ioannis Thomae, Vindobonae.
27. Lönnberg, E. (1897) Skorpioner och Pedipalper i Upsala Universitets Zoologiska Museum. Entomologisk Tidskrift, 18, 175-192.
28. Lönnberg, E. (1898) A revision of the Linnean type specimens of scorpions and pedipalps in the Zoological Museum of the Royal University at Upsala. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (7) 1, 82-89.
29. Mahnert, V. (2003) Four new species of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones: Neobisiidae, Chernetidae) from caves in Yunnan Province, China. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 110, 739-748.
30. Murthy, V.A. & Ananthakrishnan, T.N. (1977) Indian Chelonethi. Oriental Insects Monograph 4, 1-210.
31. Pinto-da-Rocha, R., Machado, G. and Giribet, G. (eds) (2007) Harvestmen: the biology of Opiliones. Harvard University Press Cambridge.
32. Roewer, C.F. (1932) Solifugae, Palpigradi. In: Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. 5: Arthropoda. IV: Arach noidea. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, vol. 5(IV)(4)(1), 1-160.
33. Roewer, C.F. (1933) Solifugae, Palpigradi. In: Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. 5: Arthropoda. IV: Arach noidea. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, vol. 5(IV)(4)(2-3), 161-480.
34. Roewer, C.F. (1934) Solifugae, Palpigradi. In: Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. 5: Arthropoda. IV: Arach noidea. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, vol. 5(IV)(4)(4-5), 481-723.
35. Rowland, J.M. & Reddell, J.R. (1979a) The order Schizomida (Arachnida) in the New World. I. Protoschizomidae and dumitrescoae group (Schizomidae: Schizomus). Journal of Arachnology, 6, 161-196.
36. Rowland, J.M. & Reddell, J.R. (1979b) The order Schizomida (Arachnida) in the New World. II. Simonis and brasilien sis groups (Schizomidae: Schizomus). Journal of Arachnology, 7, 89-119.
37. Rowland, J.M. & Reddell, J.R. (1980) The order Schizomida (Arachnida) in the New World. III. Mexicanus and pecki groups (Schizomidae: Schizomus). Journal of Arachnology, 8, 1-34.
38. Rowland, J.M. & Reddell, J.R. (1981) The order Schizomida (Arachnida) in the New World. IV. Goonightorum and briggsi groups (Schizomidae: Schizomus). Journal of Arachnology, 9, 19-46.
39. Schawaller, W. (1995) Review of the pseudoscorpion fauna of China (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpionida). Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 102, 1045-1064.
40. Selden, P.A. (1993) Fossil arachnids-recent advances and future prospects. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 33, 389-400.
41. Selden, P.A. & Dunlop, J.A. (1998) Fossil taxa and relationships of Chelicerata. In: Edgecombe, G. (Ed.), Arthropod fossils and phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 303-331.
42. Selden, P.A., Shear, W.A. & Bonamo, P.M. (1991) A spider and other arachnids from the Devonian of New York, and reinterpretations of Devonian Araneae. Palaeontology, 34, 241-281.
43. Shear, W.A. (1991) The early development of terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 351, 283-289.
44. Shear, W.A., Palmer, J.M., Coddington, J.A. & Bonamo, P.M. (1989) A Devonian spinneret: early evidence of spiders and silk use. Science 246, 479-481.
45. The Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World (1999) The Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World, 10th edition. Times Books, London. Vázquez, M.M. & Klompen, H. (2002) The family Opilioacaridae (Acari: Parasitiformes) in North and Central America, with description of four new species. Acarologia, 42, 299-322.
46. Víquez, C. & Armas, L.F. de (2005) Dos neuves generös de vinagrillos de Centroamérica y las Antillas (Arachnida: Thelyphonida). Boletin de la Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa, 37, 95-98.
47. Víquez, C. & Armas, L.F. de (2006) Un nuevo género y dos nuevas especies de vinagrillos centroamericanos (Arachnida: Thelyphonida). Boletin de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 38, 37-41.
48. Víquez, C. & Armas, L.F. de (2007) A new species of Mastigoproctus Pocock, 1894 (Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae) from Venezuela. Zootaxa, 1463, 39-45.
49. Wallin, L. (1994) Catalogue of type specimens 4. Linnaean specimens. Uppsala University, Zoological Museum, Uppsala.
50. Weygoldt, P. (1998) Revision of the species of Phrynichus Karsch, 1879 and Euphrynichus Weygoldt, 1995 (Chelicerata, Amblypygi). Zoologien, Stuttgart, 147, 1-65.
51. Weygoldt, P. (2000) Whip spiders. Their biology, morphology and systematics. Apollo Books, Stenstrup.
52. Weygoldt, P. (2002) Phrynus ceylonicus C.L. Koch, 1843 (Arachnida, Amblypygi): proposed precedence of the specific name over Phalangium reniforme Linnaeus, 1758 and Phalangium lunatum Pallas, 1772. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 59, 242-245.
53. Williams, M., Dunkerley, D., De Deckker, P., Kershaw, P. & Chappell, J (eds) (1998) Quaternary environments, second edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
54. Yeates, D.K., Harvey, M.S. & Austin, A.D. (2004) New estimates for terrestrial arthropod species-richness in Australia. Records of the South Australian Museum, Monograph Series, 7, 231-241.
55. Zeh, D.W. & Zeh, J. A. (1992a) Dispersal-generated sexual selection in a beetle-riding pseudoscorpion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 135-142.
56. Zeh, D.W. & Zeh, J. A. (1992b) On the function of harlequin beetle-riding in the pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scorpioides (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae). Journal of Arachnology, 20, 47-51.
57. Zeh, D.W. & Zeh, J.A. (1994a) When morphology misleads: intrapopulation uniformity in sexual selection masks genetic divergence in harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion populations. Evolution, 48, 1168-1182.
58. Zeh, D.W. & Zeh, J.A. (1997) Sex via the substrate: mating systems, sexual selection and speciation in pseudoscorpions. In: Choe, J.C. and Crespi, B.J. (eds), The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 329-339.
59. Zeh, D.W. & Zeh, J.A. (1999) Transmission distortion al a minisatellite locus in the Harlequin Beetle Riding pseudoscorpion. Journal of Heredity, 90, 320-323.
60. Zeh, D.W., Zeh, J. A. & Bermingham, E. (1997) Polyandrous, sperm-storing females: carriers of male genotypes through episodes of adverse selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264, 119-125.
61. Zeh, D.W., Zeh, J.A., Coffroth, M.A. & Bermingham, E. (1992) Population-specific DNA fingerprints in a neotropical pseudoscorpion (Cordylochernes scorpioides). Heredity, 69, 201-208.
62. Zeh, D.W., Zeh, J.A. & May, C.A. (1994) Charomid-cloning vectors meet the pedipalpal chelae: single-locus minisatellite DNA probes for paternity assignment in the harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion. Molecular Ecology, 3, 517-522.
63. Zeh, J.A. (1997) Polyandry and enhanced reproductive success in the harlequin-beetle-riding pseudoscorpion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 111-118.
64. Zeh, J.A., Newcomer, S.D. & Zeh, D.W. (1998) Polyandrous females discriminate against previous mates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 95, 13732-13736.
65. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. (1994b) Last-male sperm precedence breaks down when females mate with three males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B) 257, 287-292.
66. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. (2006) Outbred embryos rescue inbred half-siblings in mixed-paternity broods of live-bearing females. Nature, 439, 201-203.
67. Zeh, J.A., Zeh, D.W. & Bonilla, M.M. (2003) Phylogeography of the harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion and the rise of the Isthmus of Panama. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2759-2769.
68. Zeh, J.A., Zeh, D.W. & Younger, M. (2001) Spontaneous abortion depresses female sexual receptivity in a viviparous arthropod. Animal Behaviour, 62, 427-433.