Dominant party strategy and democratization

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 16-31

  Greene, Kenneth F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349083253     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00296.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, James, Samuel Merrill III., and Bernard Grofman. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York : Cambridge University Press.
2. Aldrich, John. 1983 A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism American Political Science Review 77 (4 974 90.
3. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1997 A New Approach for Modeling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections Working Paper 1023, California Institute of Technology.
4. Arian, Alan, and Samuel Barnes. 1974 The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability Journal of Politics 36 (3 592 614.
5. Camp, Roderic Ai. 1995. Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884-1991. Austin : University of Texas Press.
6. Centeno, Miguel Angel. 1994. Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.
7. Chu, Yun-han. 2001 The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan In Political Parties and Democracy, ed. L. Diamond and R. Gunther. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University, 266 98.
8. Chua, Huat. 2001 Defeat of the KMT: Implications for One-Party Quasi-Democratic Regimes in Southeast Asia In Taiwan's Presidential Politics: Democratization and Cross-Strait Relations in the Twenty-First Century, ed. M. Alagappa. New York : M. E. Sharpe, 133 54.
9. Cox, Gary. 1987 The Uncovered Set and the Core American Journal of Political Science 31 (1 408 22.
10. Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. New York : Cambridge University Press.
11. Coulon, Christian. 1990 Senegal: The Development and Fragility of Semi-Democracy In Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy, ed. L. Diamond, J. Linz, and S. M. Lipset. Boulder, CO : Lynne Rienner, 411 48.
12. Domínguez, Jorge, and James McCann. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York : Harper and Row.
14. Eisenstadt, Todd. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. New York : Cambridge University Press.
15. Greene, Kenneth F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York : Cambridge University Press.
16. Groseclose, Tim. 2001 A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage American Journal of Political Science 45 (4 862 86.
17. Hinich, Melvin and Michael Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
18. Kessler, Timothy. 1999. Global Capital and National Politics: Reforming Mexico's Financial System. Westport, CT : Praeger.
19. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
20. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
21. Langston, Joy. 2003 Rising from the Ashes? Reorganizing and Unifying the PRI's State Party Organizations after Electoral Defeat Comparative Political Studies 36 (3 293 318.
22. Laver, Michael, and Norman Schofield. 1990. Multiparty Government. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
23. Lawson, Chappell. 1999 Why Cárdenas Won: The 1997 Elections in Mexico City In Toward Mexico's Democratization, ed. J. Domínguez and A. Poiré. London : Routledge, 147 73.
24. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2002 The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism Journal of Democracy 13 (2 51 65.
25. Lewis, Jeffrey, and Drew Linzer. 2005 Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates Political Analysis 13 (4 345 64.
26. Lin, Tse-min. 2007 The 'Minimum-Sum Point' as a Solution Concept in Spatial Voting Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
27. Lin, Tse-min, James Enelow, and Han Dorussen. 1999 Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting Public Choice 98 : 59 82.
28. Lipset, Seymour Martin, ed. 1998. Democracy in Europe and the Americas. Washington, DC : Congressional Quarterly.
29. Lujambio, Alonso. 2001 Democratization through Federalism? The National Action Party Strategy, 1939-2000 In Party Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico, ed. K. Middlebrook. La Jolla, CA : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, 47 94.
30. Magaloni, Beatriz. 1997. The Dynamics of Dominant Party Decline: The Mexican Transition to Multipartyism. PhD dissertation, Duke University.
31. Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York : Cambridge University Press.
32. May, John. 1973 Opinion Structures and Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity Political Studies 21 : 135 51.
33. McKelvey, Richard. 1976 Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control Journal of Economic Theory 12 (3 472 82.
34. McKelvey, Richard. 1986 Covering, Dominance, and Institution-Free Properties of Social Choice American Journal of Political Science 30 (2 283 314.
35. Meguid, Bonnie. 2005 Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success American Political Science Review 99 (3 347 59.
36. Miller, Nicolas. 1980 A New Solution Set for Tournament and Majority Voting American Journal of Political Science 24 (1 68 96.
37. Mizrahi, Yemile. 2003. From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press.
38. Molinar, Juan. 1991 Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index American Political Science Review 85 (4 1383 91.
39. Moreno, Alejandro. 1999 Ideología y voto: dimensiones de competencia política en México en los noventa Política y Gobierno 6 (1 45 81.
40. Niou, Emerson, and Peter Ordeshook. 1992 A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Republic of China's Emerging Electoral System International Political Science Review 13 (1 59 79.
41. Osborne, Martin, and Al Slivinski. 1996 A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1 65 96.
42. Otake, Hideo. 1990 Defense Controversies and One-Party Dominance: The Opposition in Japan and West Germany In Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes, ed. T. J. Pempel. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, 128 61.
43. Plott, Charles. 1967 A Notion of Equilibrium and Its Possibility under Majority Rule American Political Science Review 57 (4 787 806.
44. Poiré, Alejandro. 2000 Un modelo sofisticado de decisión electoral racional Política y Gobierno 3 (2 353 82.
45. Riker, William. 1976 The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's Law Comparative Politics 9 (1 93 106.
46. Riker, William. 1983 Heresthetics and the Art of Political Manipulation In The State of the Discipline, ed. A. Finifter. Washington, DC : American Political Science Association, 47 67.
47. Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
48. Schedler, Andreas. 2002 The Menu of Manipulation Journal of Democracy 13 (2 36 50.
49. Wilson, Carole. 1999 Regional Party Strength and Strategic Considerations in the 1994 Mexican Presidential Election Latin American Studies Association Congress, Miami.