A unifying probabilistic framework for analyzing residual dipolar couplings

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 135-144

  Habeck, Michael ^a,b   Nilges, Michael ^c   Rieping, Wolfgang ^d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Inferential structure determination; Markov chain Monte Carlo; NMR structure determination; Protein structure; Residual dipolar couplings

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HISTOGRAM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; LIQUID CRYSTALS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; ROTATION;

EID: 38349075835     PISSN: 09252738     EISSN: 15735001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10858-007-9215-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Almond A, Axelsen JB (2002) Physical interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in neutral aligned media. J Am Chem Soc 124(34):9986-9987
2. Azurmendi HF, Bush CA (2002) Tracking alignment from the moment of inertia tensor (TRAMITE) of biomolecules in neutral dilute liquid crystal solutions. J Am Chem Soc 124(11):2426-2427
3. Bax A (2003) Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics. Protein Sci 12:1-16
4. Bax A, Grishaev A (2005) Weak alignment NMR: A hawk-eyed view on biomolecular structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:563-570
5. Bax A, Kontaxis G, Tjandra N (2001) Dipolar couplings in macromolecular structure determination. Methods Enzymol 339:127-174
6. Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Tjandra N (1998a) Direct structure refinement against residual dipolar couplings in the presence of rhombicity of unknown magnitude. J Magn Reson 131:159-162
7. Clore GM, Bax A, Gronenborn AM (1998b) A robust method for determining the magnitude of the fully asymmetric alignment tensor of oriented macromolecules in the absence of structural information. J Magn Reson 133:216-221
8. Cornilescu G, Marquardt JL, Ottiger M, Bax A (1998) Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 120:6836-6837
9. Delaglio F, Kontaxis G, Bax A (2000) Protein structure determination using molecular fragment replacement and NMR dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 122:2142-2143
10. Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans PAMI 6(6):721-741
11. Habeck M, Rieping W, Nilges M (2005a) Bayesian estimation of Karplus parameters and torsion angles from three-bond scalar coupling constants. J Magn Reson 177:160-165
12. Habeck M, Nilges M, Rieping W (2005b) Bayesian inference applied to macromolecular structure determination. Phys Rev E 72:031912
13. Habeck M, Nilges M, Rieping W (2005c) Replica-exchange Monte Carlo scheme for Bayesian data analysis. Phys Rev Lett 94:0181051-0181054
14. Habeck M, Rieping W, Nilges M (2006) Weighting of experimental evidence in macromolecular structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1756-1761
15. Hus J-C, Marion D, Blackledge M (2000) De novo determination of protein structure by NMR using orientational and long-range order restraints. J Mol Biol 298:927-936
16. Hus J-C, Marion D, Blackledge M (2001) Determination of protein backbone structure using only residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 123:1541-1542
17. Jaynes ET (2003) Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Jeffreys H (1946) An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proc R Soc A 186:453-461
19. Karplus M (1963) Vicinal proton coupling in nuclear magnetic resonance. J Am Chem Soc 85:2870-2871
20. Lipsitz RS, Tjandra N (2004) Residual dipolar couplings in NMR structure analysis. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 33:387-412
21. Losonczi JA, Andrec M, Fischer MWF, Prestegard JH (1999) Order matrix analysis of residual dipolar couplings using singular value decomposition. J Magn Reson 138:334-342
22. Moltke S, Grzesiek S (1999) Structural constraints from residual tensorial couplings in high resolution NMR without an explicit term for the alignment tensor. J Biomol NMR 15:77-82
23. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1989) Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Prestegard J (1998) New techniques in structural NMR - anisotropic interactions. Nat Struct Biol 5(Suppl):517-522
25. Rieping W, Habeck M, Nilges M (2005a) Inferential structure determination. Science 309:303-306
26. Rieping W, Habeck M, Nilges M (2005b) Modeling errors in NOE data with a lognormal distribution improves the quality of NMR structures. J Am Chem Soc 27:16026-16027
27. Sass H-J, Musco G, Stahl SJ, Wingfield PT, Grzesiek S (2001) An easy way to include weak alignment constraints into NMR structure calculations. J Biomol NMR 21:275-280
28. Saupe A, Englert G (1963) High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of orientated molecules. Phys Rev Lett 11:462-464
29. Tjandra N, Bax A (1997) Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278:1111-1114
30. Tjandra N, Omichinski JG, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM, Bax A (1997) Use of dipolar H1-N15 and H1-C13 couplings in the structure determination of magnetically oriented macromolecules in solution. Nat Struct Biol 4:732-738
31. Tolman JR, Flanagan JM, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH (1995) Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: Information for structure determination in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9279-9283
32. Vijay-Kumar S, Bugg CE, Cook WJ (1987) Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 194(3):531-544
33. Warren JJ, Moore PB (2001) A maximum likelihood method for determining and R for sets of dipolar coupling data. J Magn Reson 149:271-275
34. Zweckstetter M (2006) Prediction of charge-induced molecular alignment: residual dipolar couplings at pH 3 and alignment in surfactant liquid crystalline phases. Eur Biophys J 35:170-180
35. Zweckstetter M, Bax AJ (2000) Prediction of sterically induced alignment in a dilute liquid crystalline phase: Aid to protein structure determination by NMR. J Am Chem Soc 122:3791-3792
36. Zweckstetter M, Bax A (2002) Evaluation of uncertainty in alignment tensors obtained from dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 23:127-137
37. Zweckstetter M, Hummer G, Bax A (2004) Prediction of charge-induced alignment of biomolecules dissolved in dilute liquid-crystalline phases. Biophys J 86:3444-3460