Mitochondrial DNA haplotype diversity in apparent XY female fall-run and spring-run Chinook salmon in California's Central Valley

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1480-1486

  Williamson, Kevin S ^a   May, Bernie ^b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIVERGENCE; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HORMONE; KARYOTYPE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; SALMONID;

BUTTE CREEK; CALIFORNIA; CENTRAL VALLEY [CALIFORNIA]; COLUMBIA BASIN; DEER CREEK; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CERVIDAE; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 38349063490     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T06-261.1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Afonso, L. O. B., J. L. Smith, M. G. Ikonomou, and R. H. Devlin. 2002. Y-chromosome DNA markers for discrimination of chemical substance and effluent effects on sexual differentiation in salmon. Environmental Health Perspectives 110:881-887.
2. Allendorf, F. W., W. A. Gellman, and G. H. Thorgaard. 1994. Sex linkage of two enzyme loci in Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout). Heredity 72:498-507.
3. Baker, I. J., I. I. Solar, and E. M. Donaldson. 1988. Masculinization of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) by immersion treatments using 17α-methyltestosterone around the time of hatching. Aquaculture 72:359-367.
4. Banks, M. A., V. K. Rashbrook, M. J. Calavetta, C. A. Dean, and D. Hedgecock. 2000. Analysis of microsatellite DNA resolves genetic structure and diversity of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California's Central Valley. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:915-927.
5. Bull, J. J. 1983. Evolution of sex-determining mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California.
6. CDFG-NMFS (California Department of Fish and Game and National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Region Joint Hatchery Review Committee). 2001. Final report on anadromous salmonid fish hatcheries in California. Available: www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/documents/HAT/Hat_FinalCommitteeReport_2001.pdf. (September 2007).
7. Chowen, T. R., and J. J. Nagler. 2004a. Lack of sex specificity for growth hormone pseudogene in fall-run Chinook salmon from the Columbia River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:279-282.
8. Chowen, T. R., and J. J. Nagler. 2004b. Temporal and spatial occurrence of female Chinook salmon carrying a male-specific genetic marker in the Columbia River watershed. Environmental Biology of Fishes 69:427-432.
9. Craig, J. K., C. J. Foote, and C. C. Wood. 1996. Evidence for temperature-dependent sex determination in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:141-147.
10. Devlin, R. H., C. A. Biagi, and D. E. Smailus. 2001. Genetic mapping of Y-chromosomal DNA markers in Pacific salmon. Genetica 111:43-58.
11. Devlin, R. H., B. K. McNeil, I. I. Salar, and E. M. Donaldson. 1994. A rapid PCR-based test for Y-chromosomal DNA allows simple production of all-female strains of Chinook salmon. Aquaculture 128(3-4):211-220.
12. Devlin, R. H., L. Park, D. M. Sakhrani, J. D. Baker, A. R. Marshall, E. LaHood, S. E. Kolesar, M. R. Mayo, C. A. Biagi, and M. Uh. 2005. Variation of Y-chromosomal DNA markers in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62:1386-1399.
13. Devlin, R. H., G. W. Stone, and D. E. Smailus. 1998. Extensive direct-tandem organization of a long-repeat DNA sequence on the Y chromosome of Chinook salmon. Journal of Molecular Evolution 46:277-287.
14. Du, S. J., R. H. Devlin, and C. L. Hew. 1993. Genomic structure of growth hormone genes in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): presence of two functional genes, GH-I and GH-II, and a male-specific pseudogene, GH-PSI. DNA and Cell Biology 12:739-751.
15. Fisher, R. A. 1934. Statistical methods for research workers, 5th edition. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.
16. Gyllensten, U., D. Warton, and A. C. Wilson. 1985. Maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA during backcrossing of two species of mice. Journal of Heredity 76:321-324.
17. Jobling, S., M. Nolan, C. R. Tyler, G. Brightly, and J. P. Sumpter. 1998. Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish. Environmental Science and Technology 32:2498-2506.
18. Larsson, D., G. Joakim, H. Hallman, and L. Forlin. 2000. More male fish embryos near a pulp mill. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19:2911-2917.
19. May, B., K. R. Johnson, and J. E. Wright, Jr. 1989. Sex linkage in salmonids: evidence from a hybridized genome of brook trout and Arctic char. Biochemical Genetics 27:291-301.
20. Nagler, J. J., J. Bouma, G. H. Thorgaard, and D. D. Dauble. 2001. High incidence of a male-specific genetic marker in phenotypic female Chinook salmon from the Columbia River. Environmental Health Perspectives 109:67-69.
21. Nagler, J. J., P. Weller, and G. H. Thorgaard. 2003. Daily temperature shifts during the embryonic period do not alter the phenotypic sex ratio of spring-run Chinook salmon. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 28:169.
22. Nielsen, J. L., and C. Gan. 1994. Differences in genetic diversity for mitochondrial DNA between hatchery and wild populations of Oncorhynchus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51(Supplement 1):290-297.
23. Nielsen, J. L., D. Tupper, and K. W. Thomas. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in unique runs of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River basin. Conservation Biology 8:882-884.
24. Piferrer, F., and E. M. Donaldson. 1992. The comparative effectiveness of the natural and a synthetic estrogen for the direct feminization of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 106:183-193.
25. Rodgers-Gray, T. P., S. Jobling, C. Kelly, S. Morris, G. Brightly, M. J. Waldock, J. P. Sumpter, and C. R. Tyler. 2001. Exposure of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to treated sewage effluent induces dose-dependent and persistent disruption in gonadal duct development. Environmental Science and Technology 35:462-470.
26. Rubin, D. A. 1985. Effect of pH on sex ratio in cichlids and a poeciliid (Teleostei). Copeia 1985:233-235.
27. Sholes, W. H., and R. J. Hallock. 1979. An evaluation of rearing fall-run Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, to yearlings at Feather River Hatchery, with a comparison of returns from hatchery and downstream releases. California Fish and Game 65:239-255.
28. Tyler, C. R., S. Jobling, and J. P. Sumpter. 1998. Endocrine disruption in wildlife: a critical review of the evidence. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 28:319-361.
29. Waples, R. S., D. J. Teel, J. M. Meyers, and A. R. Marshall. 2004. Life history divergence in Chinook salmon: historic contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 58:386-403.
30. Wilcoxon, F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1:80-83.
31. Williamson, K. S., and B. May. 2002. Incidence of phenotypic female Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) positive for the male Y-chromosome-specific marker OtY1 in the Central Valley, California, U.S.A. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 14:176-183.
32. Williamson, K. S., and B. May. 2005a. Inheritance studies implicate a genetic mechanism for apparent sex reversal in Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1253-1261.
33. Williamson, K. S., and B. May. 2005b. Homogenization of fall-run Chinook salmon gene pools in the Central Valley of California, USA. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:993-1009.