Collective preferences in strategic decisions

Psychological Reports

Volumn 101, Issue 3 I, 2007, Pages 803-815

  Rose, Jo ^a   Colman, Andrew M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 38349058426     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.101.3.803-815     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ANDREONI, J. (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464-477.
2. BACHARACH, M. (1994) Variable universe games. In K. Binmore, A. P. Kirman, & P. Tani (Eds.), Frontiers of game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 255-275.
3. BACHARACH, M. (1999) Interactive team reasoning: a contribution to the theory of cooperation. Research in Economics, 53, 117-147.
4. BACHARACH, M. (2006) Beyond individual choice: teams and frames in game theory. (N. Gold & R. Sugden, Eds.) Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
5. BATSON, C. D. (1994) Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 603-610.
6. BECKER, G. S. (1974) A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063-1093.
7. BELL, D. E., RAIFFA, H., & TVERSKY, A. (1988) Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making, In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, Univer. Press. Pp. 9-30.
8. CIALDINI, R. B., SCHALLER, M., HOULIHAN, D., ARPS, K., FULTZ, J., & BEAMAN, A. L. (1987) Empathy-based helping: is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749-758.
9. COLMAN, A. M., PULFORD, B. D., & ROSE, J. (in press) Collective rationality in interactive decisions: evidence for team reasoning. Acta Psychologica.
10. DAWES, R. M. (1988) Rational choice in an uncertain world. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11. DAWES, R. M., VAN DE KRAGT, A. J. C., & ORBELL, J. M. (1988) Not me or thee but we: the importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: experimental manipulation. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83-97.
12. DAWES, R. M., VAN DE KRAGT, A. J. C., & ORBELL, J. M. (1990) Cooperation for the benefit of us: not me, or my conscience. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest, Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press. Pp. 97-110.
13. EISER, J. R., & BHAVNANI, K. K. (1974) The effect of situational meaning on the behaviour of subjects in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 93-97.
14. FONTAINE, G. (2004) Sense of presence and self-reported performance in international teams. Psychological Reports. 95, 154-158.
15. FORESTER, G. L., THOMS, P., & PINTO, J. K. (2007) Importance of goal setting in virtual project teams. Psychological Reports, 100, 270-274.
16. GILBERT, M. (1989) Folk psychology takes sociality seriously. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 707-708.
17. GILBERT, M. (1994) Me, you, and us: distinguishing "egoism," "altruism," and "groupism." Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 621-622.
18. GILBERT, M. (2000) Collective preferences, obligations, and rational choice. Economics and Philosophy. 17, 109-119.
19. HURLEY, S. (1989) Natural reasons. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
20. HURLEY, S. (1991) Ncwcomb's problem, prisoners' dilemma, and collective action. Synthese, 86, 173-196.
21. HURLEY, S. (1994) A new take from Nozick on Newcomb's problem and Prisoners' Dilemma. Analysis, 54, 65-72.
22. JEFFREY, R. C. (1983) The logic of decision. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
23. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
24. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (Eds.) (2000) Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
25. KERR, N. L. (1992) Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas, In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Mcssick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: theoretical issues and research findings. Oxford, UK; Pergamon. Pp. 59-80.
26. LEVIN, I. P., & GAETH, G. J. (1988) How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 574-378.
27. MANKTELOW, K. I., & OVER, D. E. (1991) Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals. Cognition, 39, 85-105.
28. MCCUNTOCK, C. G. (1972) Social motivation: a set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438-454.
29. MILES, J. A. (2000) Relationships of collective orientation and cohesion to team outcomes. Psychological Reports, 86, 435-444.
30. OLSON, M. (1965) The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
31. ORMEROD, T. C., MANKTELOW, K. I., ROBSON, E. H., & STEWARD, A. P. (1986) Content and representation effects with reasoning tasks in PROLOG form. Behaviour and Information Technology, 5, 157-168.
32. SAVAGE, L. J. (1954/1972) The foundations of statistics. New York: Dover.
33. SUGDEN, R. (1993) Thinking as a team: towards an explanation of nonselfish behaviour. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10, 69-89.
34. SUGDEN, R. (2000) Team preferences. Economics and Philosophy, 16, 175-204.
35. SUGDEN, R. (2005) The logic of team reasoning. In N. Gold (Ed.), Teamwork: multi-disciplinary perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 181-199.
36. TVERSKY, A., & KAHNEMAN, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
37. VAN LANGE, P. A. M. (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: an integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 337-349.