Internal consistency, factor structure, and concurrent validity of the treatment evaluation inventory

Psychological Reports

Volumn 101, Issue 3 I, 2007, Pages 731-738

  Newton, J T ^a,c   Nabeyama, R ^b   Sturmey, P ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PATIENT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; PATIENTS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 38349054830     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.101.3.731-738     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ANASTASI, A. (1976) Psychological testing. (4th ed.) New York: Macmillan.
2. BURGIO, L. D., & SINNOTT, J. (1990) Behavioural treatments and pharmacotherapy: acceptability ratings by elderly individuals in residential settings, The Gerontologist, 30, 811-816,
3. BURGIO, L. D., SINNOTT, J., JANOSKY, J. E., & HOHMAN, M. J. (1992) Physicians' acceptance of behavioral treatments and pharmacotherapy for behavioural disturbances in older adults. The Gerontologist, 32, 546-551.
4. HAVELKA, C., MCTIGUE, S., WILSON, S., & ODOM, J. (1992) The influence of social status and prior explanation on parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques. Pediatric Dentistry, 14, 376-381.
5. KAZDIN, A. E. (1979) Advances in child behavior therapy: applications and implications. American Psychologist, 34, 981-987.
6. KAZDIN, A. E. (1980) Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
7. KAZDIN, A. E. (1984) Acceptability of aversive procedures and medication as treatment alternatives for child deviant behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 12, 289-301.
8. KAZDIN, A. E., FRENCH, N. H., &SHERICK, R. B. (1981) Acceptability of alternative treatments for children: evaluation by inpatient children, parents, and staff. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49. 900-907.
9. KAZDIN, A. , MATSON, I. L. (1981) Social validity in mental retardation. Applied Research in Menial Retardation, 2. 39-53.
10. KORTH, B., & TUCKER, L. R. (1975) The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simulated data. Psychometrika, 40, 361-372.
11. MCDONNELL, A. J., DEARDEN, R., & STURMEY, P. (1993) The acceptability of physical restraint procedures for people with learning disabilities. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 21.255-264.
12. MCDONNELL, A. J., & STURMEY, P. (2000) The social validation of physical restraint procedures with people with developmental disabilities: a comparison of young people and professional groups. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 85-92.
13. MILTENBEGER, R. G., LENNOX, D. B., & ERFANIAN, N. (1989) Acceptability of alternative treatments for persons with mental retardation; ratings from institutional and communitybased staff. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 388-395.
14. MORGAN, R. L. (1989) Judgements of restrictiveness, social acceptability, and usage: review of research on procedures to decrease behaviour. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 121-133.
15. NEWTON, J. T., HARTLEY, P., & STURMEY, P. (1993) Treatment evaluation for eating disorders by clients with eating disorders. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 21, 371-374.
16. PICKERING, D., & MORGAN, S. B. (1985) Parental ratings of treatments of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15, 313-314.
17. SCOTT, S., & GARCIA-GOODY, K (1998) Attitudes of Hispanic parents toward behavior management techniques. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 65, 128-131.
18. STURMEY, P. (1992) Treatment acceptability for anorexia nervosa: effect of treatment type, problem severity and treatment outcome. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 20, 91-93.
19. WOLF, M. M. (1978) Social validity or how behaviour analysis is finding a heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 11, 203-214,