Breast cancer screening compliance among young women in a free access healthcare system

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 20-24

  Amin, Asna ^a   Shriver, Craig D ^a,d,e   Henry, Leonard R ^a   Lenington, Sarah ^b   Peoples, George E ^c,f   Stojadinovic, Alexander ^a,f  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SGL Biomedical Consulting LLC   (United States)

^c BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d General Surgery

^e Clinical Breast Care Project

^f Clinical Breast Care Project ^*

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Compliance; Electrical impedance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ASIAN; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONFERENCE PAPER; ETHNICITY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GAIL MODEL RISK SCORE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PACIFIC ISLANDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE;

EID: 38349047830     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20895     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al.: Cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network (CISNET) collaborators. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-1792.
2. Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E, et al.: Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: Update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:168-183.
3. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 17 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2005 Sub (1973-2003 varying), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2006.
4. Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. (eds): SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2003, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer. gov/csr/1975_2003/, based on November 2005 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2006.
5. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ: American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:41-52.
6. Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, et al.: Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33:29-53.
7. Qureshi M, Thacker HL, Litaker DG, et al.: Differences in breast cancer screening rates: An issue of ethnicity or socioeconomics? J Women's Health Gend Based Med 2000;9:1025-1031.
8. Rahman SM, Dignan MB, Shelton BJ, et al.: Factors influencing adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women aged 40 years and older. Ethn Dis 2003;13:477-484.
9. Somkin CP, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, et al.: The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population. Med Care 2004;42:914-926.
10. Rosenberg L, Wise LA, Palmer JR, et al.: A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2628-2633.
11. Barth RJ, Jr., Gibson GR, Carney PA, et al.: Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:324-329.
12. McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Jolitz G, et al.: Survival of women ages 40-49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection. Cancer 1997;79:1923-1932.
13. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Hall HI, et al.: Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: What are the linkages to chronic disease risk? Prev Chronic Dis (serial on line) 2004:A04.
14. Cozier Y, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L, et al.: Recent mammography use among African-American women. Ethn Dis 2001;11:188-191.
15. Jones AR, Caplan LS, Davis MK: Racial/ethnic differences in the self-reported use of screening mammography. J Community Health 2003;28:303-316.
16. Peipins LA, Shapiro JA, Bobo JK, et al.: Impact of women's experiences during mammography on adherence to re-screening (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:439-447.
17. Selvin E, Brett KM: Breast and cervical cancer screening: Sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women. Am J Public Health 2003;93:618-623.
18. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Reschke AH, et al.: Disparities related to socioeconomic status and access to medical care remain in the United States among women who never had a mammogram. Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:419-425.
19. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, et al.: Survey methodology. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2004.
20. Hitchcock JL, Steckevicz MJ, Thompson WD: Screening mammography: Factors associated with adherence to recommended age/frequency guidelines. Womens Health 1995;1:221-235.
21. Antill YC, Reynolds J, Young MA, et al.: Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer. Fam Cancer 2006;5:359-368.
22. Buseman S, Mouchawar J, Calonge N, et al.: Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: Evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening. Cancer 2003;97:352-358.
23. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al.: American Cancer Society High-Risk Work Group; American Cancer Society Screening Older Women Work Group; American Cancer Society Mammography Work Group; American Cancer Society Physical Examination Work Group; American Cancer Society New Technologies Work Group; American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-169.
24. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, et al.: Trial Management Group. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:2053-2060.