Quantitative structure-activity relationship of rubiscolin analogues as δ opioid peptides using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA)

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 55, Issue 20, 2007, Pages 8101-8104

  Caballero, Julio ^a   Saavedra, Mario ^a   Fernández, Michael ^b   González Nilo, Fernando D ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MATANZAS   (Cuba)

Author keywords

CoMFA; CoMSIA; Quantitative structure activity relationships; Rubiscolin analogues

Indexed keywords

DELTA OPIATE RECEPTOR; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG POTENTIATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, OPIOID, DELTA; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE;

EID: 38349031052     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf071031h     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Vaccarino, A. L.; Kastin, A. J. Endogenous Opiates: 2000. Peptides 2001, 22, 2257-2328.
2. Zadina, J. E.; Hackler, L.; Ge, L. J.; Kastin, A. J. A potent and selective endogenous agonist for the μ-opiate receptor. Nature 1997, 386, 499-502.
3. Brantl, V.; Teschemacher, H.; Henschen, A.; Lottspeich, F. Novel opioid peptides derived from casein (β-casomorphins)I. Isolation from bovine casein peptone. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 1919, 360, 1211-1216.
4. Fukudome, S.; Yoshikawa, M. Opioid peptides derived from wheat gluten: their isolation and characterization. FEBS Lett. 1992, 296, 107-111.
5. Yang, S.; Yunden, J.; Sonoda, S.; Doyama, N.; Lipkowski, A. W.; Kawamura, Y.; Yoshikawa, M. Rubiscolin, a δ selective opioid peptide derived from plant Rubisco. FEBS Lett. 2001, 509, 213-217.
6. Yang, S.; Kawamura, Y.; Yoshikawa, M. Effect of rubiscolin, a δ opioid peptide derived from Rubisco, on memory consolidation. Peptides 2003, 24, 325-328.
7. Yang, S.; Sonoda, S.; Chen, L.; Yoshikawa, M. Structure-activity relationship of rubiscolins as δ opioid peptides. Peptides 2003, 24, 503-508.
8. Alkorta, I.; Loew, G. H. A 3D model of the δ opioid receptor and ligand-receptor complexes. Protein Eng. 1996, 9, 573-583.
9. Strahs, D.; Weinstein, H. Comparative modeling and molecular dynamics studies of the δ, κ and μ opioid receptors. Protein Eng. 1997, 10, 1019-1038.
10. Pogozheva, I. D.; Lomize, A. L.; Mosberg, H. I. Opioid receptor three-dimensional structures from distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. Biophys. J. 1998, 75, 612-634.
11. Aburi, M.; Smith, P. E. Modeling and simulation of the human δ opioid receptor. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1997-2008.
12. Cramer, R. D., III; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
13. Klebe, G.; Abraham, U.; Mietzner, T. Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4130-4146.
14. SYBYL, version 7.2; Tripos Inc.: 1699 South Hanley Rd., St. Louis, MO 63144, USA.
15. Clark, M.; Cramer, R. D.; Van Opdenbosch, N. Validation of the general purpose Tripos 5.2 force field. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 982-1012.
16. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity: a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228.
17. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Beware of q2. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 269-276.
18. Bush, B. L.; Nachbar, R. B., Jr. Sample-distance partial least squares: PLS optimized for many variables, with application to CoMFA. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 587-619.
19. Hruby, V. J.; Gehrig, C. A. Recent developments in the design of receptor specific opioid peptides. Med. Res. Rev. 1989, 9, 343-401.
20. Mierke, D. F.; Nossner, G.; Schiller, P. W.; Goodman M. Morphiceptin analogs containing 2-aminocyclopentane carboxylic acid as a peptidomimetic for proline. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1990, 35, 35-45.