From patronage to program: The emergence of party-oriented legislators in Brazil

Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies

Volumn , Issue 344, 2007, Pages

  Hagopian, Frances ^a   Gervasoni, Carlos ^a,b,c,d   Moraes, Juan Andres ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA ARGENTINA   (Argentina)

^d UNIVERSIDAD TORCUATO DI TELLA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; PARTY POLITICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

BRAZIL; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 38349008446     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aldrich, J. H. & D. W. Rohde (1998). Measuring Conditional Party Government, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
2. Ames, Barry (1995a). "Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress." The Journal of Politics 57, 2 (May): 324-43.
3. Ames, Barry (1995b). "Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation." American Journal of Political Science 39, 2 (May): 406-33.
4. Ames, B. (2001). The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5. Ames, B. (2002). A Theory of Legislative Parties in Brazil. In S. Morgenstern & B. Nacif (Eds.), Legislative Politics in Latin America (pp. 185-221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Ames, B. and T. Power (2007). Parties and Governability in Brazil. In P. Webb & S. White (Eds.), Political Parties in Transitional Democracies (pp. 179-212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Amorim Neto, O., G. W. Cox, & M. D. McCubbins (2003). Agenda Power in Brazil's Câmara dos Deputados, 1989-98. World Politics 55, 4: 550-78.
8. Bressan, S. (2002). Reforma Administrativa [Administrative Reform]. In B. Lamounier & R. Figueiredo (Eds.), A Era FHC: Um Balanço [The FHC Era: An Accounting] (pp. 369-94). São Paulo: Cultura.
9. Campello de Souza, M. do C. (1976). Estado e Partidos Políticos no Brasil (1930 a 1964) [State and Political Parties in Brazil (1930 to 1964]. São Paulo: Alfa-Omega.
10. Cardoso, F. H. (1996). In Praise of the Art of Politics. Journal of Democracy 7, 3: 8-19.
11. Carey, J. (2002). Getting Their Way or Getting in the Way? Presidents and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
12. Carey, J. & M. S. Shugart (1995). Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14, 4: 417-39.
13. Carreirão, Y. de S. & M. D. A. G. Kinzo (2004). Partidos Políticos, Preferencia Partidária e Decisão Eleitoral no Brasil (1989/2002) [Political Parties, Party Preference, and Electoral Choice in Brazil (1989-2002)]. Dados 47, 1: 111-68.
14. Chubb, J. (1982). Patronage, Power, and Poverty in Southern Italy: A Tale of Two Cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cox, G. W. (1987). The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cox, G. W. & M. D. McCubbins (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Desposato, S. (2006). Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies. American Journal of Political Science 50, 1: 62-80.
18. Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro, (ESEB). (2002). CESOP-FGV/ Brasilo2.Dez-1838. In Banco de Dados do Centro de Estudos de Opinião Pública - CESOP - UNICAMP. Available at: http://www.cesop.unicamp.br/busca/CESOP/pesquisa_usuario.
19. Faoro, R. (1958): Os Donos do Poder: Formação do Patronato Político Brasileiro [The Power Barons: The Formation of the Brazilian Patrimonial Order]. Porto Alegre: Globo.
20. Figueiredo, A. C. & F. Limongi (1999). Executivo e Legislativo na nova ordem constitucional [Executive and Legislature in the New Constitutional Order]. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
21. Figueiredo, A. C. & F. Limongi (2002). Incentivos Eleitorais, Partidos e Política Orçamentária [Electoral Incentives, Parties, and Budgetary Politics]. Dados 45, 2: 303-44.
22. Folha de São Paulo (2002). Caderno Olho no Voto [Eye on the Vote]. (September 27). Available at: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/brasil/ ult96u38553.shtml.
23. Gaetani, F. & B. Heredia (2002). The Political Economy of Civil Service Reform in Brazil: The Cardoso Years. Prepared for the Inter-American Development Bank.
24. Grzymala-Busse, A. M. (2002). Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jacobson, G. C. (2000). Party Polarization in National Politics. In J. R. Bond & R. Fleischer (Eds.), Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era (pp. 9-30). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
26. Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33, 6-7: 845-79.
27. Kitschelt, H. & S. I. Wilkinson. (2007). Citizen-politician Linkages: An Introduction. In H. Kitschelt & S. I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 1-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lamounier, B. (2003). Brazil: An Assessment of the Cardoso Administration. In J. I. Domínguez & M. Shifter (Eds.), Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America (pp. 269-91). Second Edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29. Lavareda, A. (1991). A Democracia nas Urnas: O Processo Partidário-Eleitoral Brasileiro [Democracy at the Polls: The Brazilian Partisan-Electoral Process]. Rio de Janeiro: IUPERJ/Rio Fundo.
30. Leoni, E. (2002). Ideologia, Democracia e Comportamento Parlamentar: A Câmara dos Deputados (1991-1998) [Ideology, Democracy, and Parliamentary Behavior: The Chamber of Deputies (1991-1998)]. Dados 45, 3: 361-86.
31. Levitsky, S. (2003). Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lyne, M. M. (2004). "Endogenous Institutions: Electoral Law and Internal Party Dynamics in Brazil." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
33. McCubbins, M. D. & F. M. Rosenbluth (1995). Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan. In P. F. Cowhey & M. D. McCubbins (Eds.), Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States (pp. 35-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Mainwaring, S. P. (1999). Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. Melo, C. R. (2004). Retirando as Cadeiras do Lugar: Migração Partidaria na Câmara dos Deputados (1985-2002) [Pulling the Seats out of Place: Party Migration in the Chamber ofDeputies (1985-2002)]. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
36. Morgenstern, S. (2004). Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll- Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Panizza, F. (2000). Is Brazil becoming a 'boring' country? Bulletin of Latin American Research 19, 501-25.
38. Pereira, C. & L. Renno (2003). Successful re-election strategies in Brazil: The electoral impact of distinct institutional incentives. Electoral Studies 22, 3: 425-48.
39. Pereira, C. & B. Mueller (2004). The Cost of Governing: Strategic Behavior of the President and Legislators in Brazil's Budgetary Process. Comparative Political Studies 37, 7: 781-815.
40. Power, T. (2000). The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
41. Roberts, K. M. & E. Wibbels (1999). Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93, 3: 575-90.
42. Rohde, D. (1991). Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Roma, C. R. (2004). Atores, Preferências e Instituição na Câmara dos Deputados [Actors, Preferences, and Institutions in the Chamber of Deputies]. Unpublished PhD Diss., University of São Paulo.
44. Samuels, D. (2003). Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Samuels, D. (2004). Political Ambition, Candidate Recruitment, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Paper prepared for the conference Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, April 3-4.
46. Samuels, D. (2006). Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil, Latin American Politics and Society, 48, 2: 1-27.
47. Sani, G. & G. Sartori. (1983). Polarization, Fragmentation and Competition in Western Democracies. In H. Dalder & P. Mair (Eds.), Western European Party Systems (pp. 307-40). Beverly Hills: Sage.
48. Santos, F. (2002). Partidos e Comissões no Presidencialismo de Coalizão [Parties and Committees in Coalition Presidentiadism]. Dados 45, 2: 37-64.
49. Silveira, F. E. (1998). A Decisão do Voto no Brasil [Deciding to Vote in Brazil]. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
50. Soares, G. A. D. (1967). The Politics of Uneven Development: The Case of Brazil. In S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party System and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (pp. 467-96). New York: Free Press.