The insanity defense: Legal standards and clinical assessment

Applied and Preventive Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 163-178

  Ogloff, James R P ^a   Roberts, Caton F ^b   Roesch, Ronald ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical assessment; criminal responsibility; Forensic psychology; Insanity defense

Indexed keywords

EID: 38249000076     PISSN: 09621849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80122-2     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Reliability of lifetime diagnosis
2. Veils, values, and social responsibility
3. Guilty but mentally ill: An alternative verdict
4. The role of mental health professionals in the criminal process The case for informed speculation
5. Resurrection of the ultimate issue rule: Federal rule of evidence 704 (b) and the insanity defense
6. Insanity defense reform in the United States—Post-Hinckley
7. Evaluating Michigan's guilty but mentally ill verdict: An empirical study
8. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists
9. Mental status examination
10. A diagnostic interview
11. The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing
12. The assessment, treatment and community outcome of insanity acquittees: Forensic history and response to treatment
13. The assessment of criminal responsibility: An historical approach to a current controversy
14. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the ultimate issue rule
15. Insanity defense in the District of Columbia—A legal Lorelie
16. A critique of current psychiatric roles in the legal process
17. Judgment of legal insanity as a function of attitude toward the insanity defense
18. When courts and experts disagree: Discordance between insanity recommendations and adjudications
19. The relationship of competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility
20. Defining the standard of proof in jury instructions
21. Researching and reforming the insanity defense
22. Investigative reporting as a research method: An analysis of Bernstein and Woodward's All the President's Men
23. Assessing and predicting violence: Research, law, and applications
24. The ‘pandemonium between the mad and the bak’: Procedures for the commitment and release of insanity acquittees after Jones v. United States
25. The reliability of psychiatric and psychological diagnosis
26. Burden of proof: Degrees of belief, quanta of evidence, or constitutional guarantees?
27. The “guilty but mentally ill” plea and verdict: Current state of the knowledge
28. A pleasant surprise: The guilty but mentally ill verdict has both succeeded in its own right and successfully preserved the traditional role of the insanity defense
29. The modern foundation for the insanity defense The cases of James Hadfield (1800) and Daniel McNaughtan (1843)
30. Acquittal by reason of insanity
31. Crazy behavior, morals, and science: An analysis of mental health law
32. Excusing the crazy: The insanity defense reconsidered
33. The admissibility of expert testimony regarding malingering and deception
34. A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making
35. How much do we really know? A review of the empirical research on the insanity defense
36. Competencies in the criminal process
37. The legal status of the psychiatrist in the courtroom
38. The things we do for love: John Hinckley's trial and the future of the insanity defense in the Federal Courts
39. Examining the application of the guilty but mentally ill verdict in Michigan
40. The origins and development of the “wild beast” concept of mental illness and its relation to theories of criminal responsibility
41. The origins of the “right and wrong” test of criminal responsibility and its subsequent development in the United States An historical survey
42. The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity
43. Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision-making and the insanity defense
44. Competency to stand trial: Legal and clinical issues
45. The Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment scales
46. Legal outcome and clinical findings: A study of insanity evaluations
47. Scientific inquiry in forensic psychiatry
48. Ultimate opinion proscriptions: A cosmetic fix and plea for empiricism
49. The RCRAS and legal insanity: A cross-validation study
50. Evaluating insanity: A study of construct validity
51. The impact of the guilty but mentally ill verdict on juror decisions An empirical analysis
52. Depression, the insanity defense, and civil commitment: Foundations in autonomy and responsibility
53. Follow-up after release of insanity acquittees, mentally disordered offenders, and convicted felons
54. The guilty but mentally ill verdict: An idea whose time should not have come
55. The meaning of mental illness in criminal responsibility
56. Defendants not guilty by reason of insanity
57. The insanity defense before 1800
58. Mental disability and criminal law