Narrative inspiration: Using case based problem solving to support emergent story generation

Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 21-28

  Swartjes, Ivo ^a   Vromen, Joost ^a   Bloom, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Case based reasoning; Computational creativity; Fabula; Story generation

Indexed keywords

CASE BASED; COMPUTATIONAL CREATIVITY; CREATIVE SYSTEMS; FABULA; GENERATION PROCESS; STORY GENERATION;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 38149122720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Aylett, R., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., and Vala, M. (2005). FearNot! - an experiment in emergent narrative. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pages 305-316.
2. Boden, M. (1990). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Abacus, London.
3. Carroll, J. J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P., and Stickler, P. (2005). Named graphs. Journal of Web Semantics, 3(4).
4. Cunningham, P. (1998). CBR: strengths and weaknesses. Technical report, University of Dublin, Computer Science Department.
5. Fairclough, C.R. Cunningham, P. (2004). AI structuralist storytelling in computer games. Technical report, University of Dublin, Computer Science Department.
6. Gervás, P., Díaz-Agudo, B., Peinado, F., and Hervás, R. (2004). Story plot generation based on CBR. Knowledge-Based Systems, 18(4-5):235-242.
7. Lang, R. R. (1999). A declarative model for simple narratives. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence.
8. Liu, H. and Singh, P. (2002). MAKEBELIEVE: Using commonsense knowledge to generate stories. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2002).
9. Loyall, A. B. (1997). Believable Agents: Building Interactive Personalities. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
10. Meehan, J. (1981). TALE-SPIN. In Schank, R. and Riesbeck, K., editors, Inside computer understanding - five programs plus miniatures, pages 197-226. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Moraes, M. C. and Costa, A. C. d. R. (2004). Imp-BDI: Improvisational BDI architecture. In Proceedings of the workshop on Architectures and Methodologies for Building Agent-Based Learning Environments.
12. Mueller, E. (1987). Daydreaming and computation: a computer model of everyday creativity, learning, and emotions in the human stream of thought. PhD thesis, University of California.
13. Peinado, F. and Gervás, P. (2006). Minstrel reloaded: from the magic of lisp to the formal semantics of OWL. In Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE).
14. Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. University of Texas Press.
15. Riedl, M. and Young, M. (2005). Story planning as exploratory creativity: Techniques for expanding the narrative search space. In Proceedings of the 2005 IJCAI Workshop on Computational Creativity.
16. Swartjes, I. and Theune, M. (2006). A Fabula Model for Emergent Narrative. In Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE).
17. Theune, M., Rensen, S., op den Akker, R., Heylen, D., and Nijholt, A. (2004). Emotional characters for automatic plot creation. In Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE).
18. Trabasso, T. and Nickels, M. (1992). The development of goal plans of action in the narration of a picture story. Discourse Processes, 15:249-275.
19. Turner, S. R. (1994). The creative process: a computer model of storytelling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Wiggins, G. A. (2001). Towards a more precise characterisation of creativity in AI. In Weber, R. and von Wangenheim, C. G., editors, Case-Based Reasoning: Papers from the Workshop Programme at ICCBR'01, pages 113-120, Washington, DC.