An exploration of performance attributes for symbolic modeling of emerging processing devices

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4782 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 683-694

  Alam, Sadaf R ^a   Bhatia, Nikhil ^a   Vetter, Jeffrey S ^a  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS;

MICROPROCESSOR EXECUTION TIMES; PROCESSING DEVICES; SYMBOLIC MODELING; VECTORIZATION;

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;

EID: 38149120794     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75444-2_64     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. AMD Dual-Core and Multi-Core Processors, http://www.amdboard.com/ dual_core.html
2. The Cell Project at IBM Research, http://www.research.ibm.com/cell/
3. Cray X1E supercomputer, http://www.cray.com/products/xle/
4. NAS Parallel Benchmarks, http://www.nas.nasa.gov/Software/NPB/
5. Optimizing Applications on Cray X1 Series Systems, available at http://docs.cray.com
6. Performance Application programming Interface (PAPI), http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/
7. Stream Memory Benchmark, http://www.streambench.org
8. Tuning and Analysis Utilities (TAU), http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/ tau/
9. Alam, S.R., Vetter, J.S.: A Framework to Develop Symbolic Performance Models of Parallel Applications. In: PMEO-PDS 2006. 5th International Workshop on Performance Modeling, Evaluation, and Optimization of Parallel and Distributed Systems (2006) (to be held in conjunction with IPDPS)
10. Alam, S.R., Vetter, J.S.: Hierarchical Model Validation of Symbolic Performance Models of Scientific Applications. In: European Conference on Parallel Computing (Euro-Par) (2006)
11. Bailey, D., Snavely, A.: Performance Modeling: Understanding the Present and Prediction the Future. In: European Conference on Parallel Computing (Euro-Par) (2005)
12. Kerbyson, D.J., et al.: A Comparison Between the Earth Simulator and AlphaServer Systems using Predictive Application Performance Models. In: International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) (2003)
13. Luk, C., et al.: Pin: Building Customized Program Analysis Tools with Dynamic Instrumentation. In: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, ACM Press, New York (2005)
14. Mohr, B., Wolf, F.: KOJAK - A Tool Set for Automatic Performance Analysis of Parallel Applications. In: European Conference on Parallel Computing (EuroPar) (2003)
15. Snavely, A., et al.: A Framework for Application Performance Modeling and Prediction. In: ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference, ACM Press, New York (2002)
16. Storaasli, O.F., et al.: Cray XD1 Experiences and Comparisons with other FPGA-based Supercomputer Systems. In: Cray User Group (CUG) Conference (2006)
17. Strohmaier, E., Shan, H.: Apex-MAP: A Global Data Access Benchmark to Analyze HPC Systems and Parallel Programming Paradigms. In: ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference (2005)
18. Vetter, J.S., et al.: Characterizing Applications on the Cray MTA-2 Multi-threaded Architecture. In: Cray User Group Conference (2006)
19. Weinberg, J., et al.: Quantifying Locality in the Memory Access Patterns of the HPC Applications. In: ACM/EEE Supercomputing Conference (2005)
20. Yang, T., et al.: Predicting Parallel Applications' Performance Across Platforms using Partial Execution. In: ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference (2005)