Stochastic sparse-spike deconvolution

Geophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Velis, Danilo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; DECONVOLUTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SEISMIC WAVES; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

QUADRATIC REGULARIZATION; SEISMIC WAVELET; SPARSE-SPIKE DECONVOLUTION; TOLERANCE ERROR;

SEISMOLOGY;

AMPLITUDE; DECONVOLUTION; INVERSE PROBLEM; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING; STOCHASTICITY; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 38149111190     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2790584     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. p-norm deconvolution: Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 381-403. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01852.x
2. Ingber, L., 1989, Very fast simulated re-annealing: Journal of Mathematical Computation and Modelling, 12, 967-973.
3. Kaaresen, K. F., and T. Taxt, 1998, Multichannel blind deconvolution of seismic signals: Geophysics, 63, 2093-2107. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1444503
4. Kormylo, J., and J. Mendel, 1978, On maximum-likelihood detection and estimation of reflection coefficients: 48th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 45-46.
5. Levy, S., and D. Oldenburg, 1982, The deconvolution of phase-shifted wavelets: Geophysics, 47, 1285-1294. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1441388
6. Martin, G. S., R. Wiley, and K. J. Marfurt, 2006, Marmousi2: An elastic upgrade for Marmousi: The Leading Edge, 25, 156-166. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.2172306
7. Mosegaard, K., and P. Vestergaard, 1991, A simulated annealing approach to seismic model optimization with sparse prior information: Geophysical Prospecting, 39, 599-612. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/ j.1365-2478.1991.tb00331.x
8. Neidell, N., 1991, Could the processed seismic wavelet be simpler than we think?: Geophysics, 56, 681-690. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
9. Nulton, J., and P. Salamon, 1988, Statistical mechanics of combinatorial optimization: Physical Reviews A, 37, 1351-1356. pra PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.37.1351
10. Oldenburg, D. W., T. Scheuer, and S. Levy, 1983, Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms: Geophysics, 48, 1318-1337. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441413
11. Porsani, M. J., and B. Ursin, 2000, Mixed-phase deconvolution and wavelet estimation: The Leading Edge, 19, 76-79. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.1438464
12. Sacchi, M. D., D. R. Velis, and A. H. Comínguez, 1994, Minimum entro-py deconvolution with frequency domain constraints: Geophysics, 6, 938-945. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
13. Ulrych, T. J., D. R. Velis, and M. D. Sacchi, 1995, Wavelet estimation revisited: The Leading Edge, 10, 1139-1143. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X
14. Velis, D. R., 2006, Parametric sparse-spike deconvolution and the recovery of the acoustic impedance: 76th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2141-2144.
15. Vestergaard, P., and K. Mosegaard, 1991, Inversion of post-stack seismic data using simulated annealing: Geophysical Prospecting, 39, 613-624. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025
16. Wang, J., X. Wang, and M. Perz, 2006, Structure preserving regularization for sparse deconvolution: 76th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2072-2076.