Projected impact of colorectal cancer screening with computerized tomographic colonography on current radiological capacity in Europe

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 366-374

  Hassan, C ^a   Laghi, A ^b   Pickhardt, P J ^c,d   Kim, D H ^c   Zullo, A ^a   Iafrate, F ^b   Morini, S ^a  

^a NUOVO REGINA MARGHERITA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; EUROPE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MACHINE; MARKOV MODEL; MASS SCREENING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUROPE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 38149108154     PISSN: 02692813     EISSN: 13652036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03575.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH, Reichelderfer M, Gopal DV, Pfau PR. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the first year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 2006 241:417 25.
2. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003 349:2191 200.
3. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004 291:1713 9.
4. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005 365:305 11.
5. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005 142:635 50.
6. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005 237:893 904.
7. Angtuaco TL, Banaad-Omiotek GD, Howden CW. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96:887 93.
8. Nadel MR, Blackman DK, Shapiro JA, et al. Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med 2002 35:199 206.
9. Boyle P, Autier P, Bartelink H, et al. European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003). Ann Oncol 2003 14:973 1005.
10. Seeff LC, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR. Are we doing enough to screen for colorectal cancer? Findings from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Fam Pract 2002 51:761 6.
11. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 1999 94:2268 74.
12. Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick AM. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 2:554 63.
13. Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J, et al. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 102:380 90.
14. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 2007 109:2213 21.
15. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 2004 127:1661 9.
16. 'The Need for Sustained Investment'. Age Profile Medical Devices, 3rd edn. Available at: http://www.cocir.org/uploads/documents/17-17-ageprofile2003. pdf, accessed on 5 June 2007.
17. Seeff LC, Tangka FK. Can we predict the outcomes of national colorectal cancer screening and can predictions help us plan? Gastroenterology 2005 129:1339 42.
18. Hassan C, Zullo A, Laghi A, et al. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2007 39:242 50.
19. International Data Base. US Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbnew.html, accessed on 5 June 2007.
20. Life Tables for WHO Member States. Available at: http://www.who.int/ whosis/database/life_tables/life_tables.cfm, accessed on 5 June 2007.
21. Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of "once-only sigmoidoscopy" - SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 94:1763 72.
22. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002 359:1291 300.
23. Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 2005 129:1151 62.
24. Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Fendrick AM. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004 20:507 15.
25. DiSario JA, Foutch PG, Mai HD, Pardy K, Manne RK. Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 1991 86:941 5.
26. Vatn MH, Stalsberg H. The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study. Cancer 1982 49:819 25.
27. Rickert RR, Auerbach O, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC, Frasca JM. Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey. Cancer 1979 43:1847 57.
28. Arminski TC, McLean MD. Incidence and distribution of adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum based on 1,000 autopsy examinations. Dis Colon Rectum 1964 7:249 61.
29. Stemmermann GN, Heilbrun LK, Nomura A, Yano K, Hayashi T. Adenomatous polyps and atherosclerosis: an autopsy study of Japanese men in Hawaii. Int J Cancer 1986 38:789 94.
30. Eide TJ. The age-, sex-, and site-specific occurrence of adenomas and carcinomas of the large intestine within a defined population. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986 21:1083 8.
31. Johnson DA, Gurney MS, Volpe RJ, et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol 1990 85:969 74.
32. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer A, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001 219:685 92.
33. Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982 23:835 42.
34. Clark JC, Collan Y, Eide TJ, et al. Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer. Int J Cancer 1985 36:179 86.
35. Koretz RL. Malignant polyps: are they sheep in wolves' clothing? Ann Intern Med 1993 118:63 8.
36. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000 343:169 74.
37. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000 343:162 8.
38. Sant M, Aareleid T, Berrino F, et al. EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94 - results and commentary. Ann Oncol 2003 14:v61 118.
39. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Schembre DB, et al. Risk stratification for colon neoplasia: screening strategies using colonoscopy and computerized tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2006 131:1011 9.
40. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 2004 14:1025 33.
41. ACRIN Protocol 6664. Available at: http://www.acrin.org/6664_protocol. html, accessed on 11 October 2007.
42. Hur C, Gazelle GS, Zalis ME, Podolsky DK. An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. Gastroenterology 2004 127:1312 21.
43. Rex DK, Lieberman D ACG. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101:1410 3.
44. van Dam J, Cotton P, Johnson CD, et al. AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2004 127:970 84.
45. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007 357:1403 12.
46. Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG, et al. National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004 111:633 9.
47. Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S, Osnes M. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996 39:449 56.
48. Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn MH, Sauar J, Larsen S. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986 21:853 62.
49. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987 93:1009 13.
50. Welin S, Youker J, Spratt JS Jr. The rates and patterns of growth of 375 tumors of the large intestine and rectum observed serially by double contrast enema study (Malmö Technique). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1963 90:673 87.
51. Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Harras A, Edwards BK (eds) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1994. Bethesda, MD:National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1997 (NIH Publication No. 97-2789).