Production and structure of unisexual and bisexual inflorescences in populations of Carex secalina (Cyperaceae)

Polish Botanical Studies

Volumn 22, Issue , 2006, Pages 343-346

  Lembicz, Marlena ^a   Bogdanowicz, Agnieszka ^a   Zukowski, Waldemar ^a  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Carex secalina; Cyperaceae; Evolution of spikes; Fertility; Life history; Sex of spikes

Indexed keywords

FERTILITY; FLOWERING; LIFE HISTORY; MONOCOTYLEDON; POPULATION ECOLOGY; SEX DETERMINATION; SHOOT;

CAREX; CAREX SECALINA; CYPERACEAE;

EID: 38149097719     PISSN: 08670730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BRUHL J. J. 1995. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Austral. Syst. Bot. 8: 125-305.
2. CHMIEL J., LEMBICZ M. & ZUKOWSKI W. 2001. Carex secalina Wild. ex Wahlenb. In: R. KAŹMIERCZAKOWA & K. ZARZYCKI (eds), Polish Red Data Book of Plants - Pteridophytes and Flowering Plants, pp. 508-510. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow.
3. EGOROVA T. V. 1999. The sedges (Carex L.) of Russia and adjacent States (within the limits of the former USSR). Russian Academy of Sciences, Komarov Botanical Institute, St. Petersburg State Chemical-Pharmaceutical Academy, St. Petersburg, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
4. HOLUB J. & PROCHÁZKA F. 2000. Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 72: 187-230.
5. KRECHETOVICH V. I. 1936. Are the sedges of subgenus Primocarex Kük. primitive? Bot. Zhurn. 21: 395-425 (in Russian with English summary).
6. KÜKENTHAL G. 1909. Cyperaceae - Caricoideae. In: A. ENGLER (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich, IV. 20, Heft 38: 1-824. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
7. MAGLOCKÝ S. & FERAKOVÁ V. 1993. Red list of ferns and flowering plants (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta) of the flora of Slovakia (the second draft). Biológia (Bratislava) 48: 361-385.
8. MEUSEL H., JÁGER E. & WEINERT F. 1965. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropaischen Flora. Vol. 1, G. Fischer Verl., Jena.
9. MUASYA A. M., SIMPSON D. S., CHASE M. W. & CULHAM A. 1998. An assessment of supergeneric phylogeny in Cyperaceae using rbcL DNA sequences. PI. Syst. Evol 211: 257-271.
10. NELMES E. 1952. Facts and speculations on phylogeny in tribe Cariceae of Cyperaceae. Kew Bull. (1951): 427-436.
11. REZNICEK A. A. 1990. Evolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 68: 1409-1432.
12. ROALSON E. H. & FRIAR E. A. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographic patterns in North American members of Carex section Acrocystis (Cyperaceae) using nrDNA and ITS and ETS sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 243: 175-187.
13. ROALSON E. H., COLUMBUS J. T. & FRIAR E. A. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in Cariceae (Cyperaceae) based on ITS (nrDNA) and trnT-L-F (cpDNA) region sequences: assessment of subgeneric and sectional relationships in Carex with emphasis on section Acrocystis. Syst. Bot. 26: 318-341.
14. TIMONEN T. 1993. Synflorescence structure of some hetero-, homo- and monostachyae sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 30: 21-42.
15. TIMONEN T. 1998. Inflorescence structure in the sedge tribe Cariceae (Cyperaceae). Publications in Botany, University of Helsinki 26: 1-35.
16. YEN A. C. & OLMSTEAD R. G. 2000. Molecular systematics of Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae based on two chloroplast DNA regions: ndhF and trnL intron intergenic spacer. Syst. Bot. 25: 479-494.