Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 205-219

  Dennen, Vanessa Paz ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance education; Group discussion; Internet; Learning

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE EDUCATION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS; WEB SERVICES;

GROUP DISCUSSION; ONLINE DISCUSSION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 38149096295     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson T., Rourke L., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 2 (2001) 1-17
2. Beaudoin M.F. Learning or lurking? Tracking the "invisible" online student. The Internet and Higher Education 5 (2002) 147-155
3. Berge Z.L., Collins M., and Dougherty K. Design guidelines for web-based courses. In: Abbey B. (Ed). Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education (2000), Idea Group, Hershey, PA
4. Bober M.J., and Dennen V.P. Intersubjectivity: facilitating knowledge construction in online environments. Educational Media International 38 4 (2001) 241-250
5. Davidson-Shivers G.V.D., Muilenburg L.Y., and Tanner E.J. How do students participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions?. Journal of Educational Computing Research 25 4 (2001) 351-366
6. De Wever B., Schellens T., Valcke M., and Van Keer H. Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 6-28
7. Dennen V.P. Task structuring for on-line problem based learning: a case study. Educational Technology and Society 3 3 (2000) 329-336
8. Dennen, V. P. (2003). Productive lurking: Non-posting participation in online course discussion. In A. Mendez-Vilas, J. A. M. Gonzalez, & J. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on multimedia information and communication technologies in education (pp. 964-967). Badajoz, Spain.
9. Dennen V.P. From message posting to learning dialogues: factors affecting learner participation in online discussion. Distance Education 26 1 (2005) 125-146
10. Dennen V.P., and Paulus T.M. Researching "collaborative knowledge building" in formal distance learning environments. In: Koschmann T., Chen T.-W., and Suthers D.D. (Eds). Computer supported collaborative learning 2005 (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 96-104
11. Gee J.P. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2005), Routledge, New York
12. Gunawardena C.N. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 2/3 (1995) 147-166
13. Gunawardena C.N., Lowe C.A., and Anderson T. Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17 4 (1997) 397-431
14. Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye A.R. (Ed). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (1992), Praeger, New York 115-136
15. Hewitt J. Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conference. Journal of Learning Science 14 4 (2005) 567-589
16. Hewson L., and Hughes C. Social processes and pedagogy in online learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal 13 2 (2005) 99-125
17. Holliman R., and Scanlon E. Investigating cooperation and collaboration in near synchronous computer mediated conferences. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 322-335
18. Holmes K. Analysis of asynchronous online discussion using the solo taxonomy. American Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology 5 (2005) 117-127
19. Jeong A. The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education 17 1 (2003) 25-43
20. Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2004). The effects of constraint-based argumentation on interaction patterns and argumentation in online threaded discussions. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
21. Jonassen D., and Remidez Jr. H. Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 1 1/2 (2005) 113-129
22. Jung I., Choi S., Lim C., and Leem J. Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 2 (2002) 153-162
23. Lamy M.-N., and Goodfellow R. "Reflective conversation" in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning and Technology 2 2 (1999) 43-61
24. Laurillard D. Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology (1993), Routledge, London
25. Lee Y., Driscoll M.P., and Nelson D.W. The past, present, and future of research in distance education: results of a content analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education 18 4 (2004) 225-241
26. Lincoln Y.S., and Guba E.G. Naturalistic inquiry (1985), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
27. Marra R.M., Moore J.L., and Klimczac A.K. Content analysis of online discussion forums: a comparative analysis of protocols. ETR&D 52 2 (2004) 23-40
28. Meyer K.A. Evaluating online discussions: four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8 2 (2004) 101-114
29. Naidu S., and Järvelä S. Analyzing CMC content for what?. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 96-103
30. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2001). The role of social presence in online courses: How does it relate to students' perceived learning and satisfaction? EdMedia.
31. Richardson J.C., and Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to student's perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 1 (2003) 68-88
32. Roblyer M.D., and Wiencke W.R. Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education 17 2 (2003) 77-98
33. Rourke L., and Anderson T. Exploring social communication in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13 3 (2002) 259-275
34. Rourke L., and Anderson T. Validity in quantitative content analysis. ETR&D 52 1 (2004) 5-18
35. Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14 3 (2001) 51-70
36. Rovai A.P. Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education 5 (2002) 197-211
37. Russell T.L. The no significant difference phenomenon (1999), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
38. Russo T.C., and Koesten J. Prestige, centrality, and learning: a social network analysis of an online class. Communication Education 54 3 (2005) 251-254
39. Salmon G. E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2000), Kogan Page, London
40. Sims R., Dobbs G., and Hand T. Enhancing quality in online learning: scaffolding planning and design through proactive evaluation. Distance Education 23 2 (2002) 135-148
41. Slack F., Beer M., Armitt G., and Green S. Assessment and learning outcomes: the evaluation of deep learning in an online course. Journal of Information Technology Education 2 (2003) 305-317
42. Stahl G. Building collaborative knowing: elements of a social theory of cscl. In: Dillenbourg P., Strijbos J.W., Kirschner P.A., and Martens R.L. (Eds). Computer supported collaborative learning: What we know about cscl and implementing it in higher education Vol. 3 (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
43. Stake R.E. The art of case study research (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
44. Valcke M., and Martens R.L. The problem arena of researching computer supported collaborative learning: introduction to the special section. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 1-5
45. Weinberger A., and Fischer F. A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 71-95