Dilemmatic human-animal boundaries in Britain and Romania: Post-materialist and materialist dehumanization

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 875-893

  Marcu, Afrodita ^a   Lyons, Evanthia ^a   Hegarty, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; DEHUMANIZATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; ROMANIA; SOCIAL CHANGE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; DEHUMANIZATION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ROMANIA; SOCIAL CHANGE;

EID: 38149076478     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466607X174356     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bar-Tal, D. (1989). Delegitimization: The extreme case of stereotyping and prejudice. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions. New-York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Causes and consequences of delegitimization: Models of conflict and ethnocentrism. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 65-81.
3. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543-582.
4. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
5. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
6. Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B. J., & McGarty, C. (2002). Collective guilt: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to inter-group relations: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.
7. Chulvi, B., & Pérez, J. A. (2003). Ontologisation vs. Discrimination d'une minorité ethnique (Les Gitans). Nouvelle Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 2(1), 6-15.
8. Chulvi, B., & Pérez, J. A. (2005). El prejuicio genealógico. Psicología Politicam, 30, 57-70.
9. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
10. Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Dimensions of uniquely and non-uniquely human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18(1), 71-96.
11. Deschamps, J. C., Vala, J., Marinho, C., Costa Lopes, R., & Cabecinhas, R. (2005). Intergroup relations, racism and attribution of natural and cultural traits. Psicologia Politica, 30, 27-39.
12. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.
13. Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8(2), 25-49.
14. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
15. Erikson, E. (1970). Ghandi's truth: On the origins of militant nonviolence. London: Faber.
16. Erikson, E. (1985). Pseudospeciation in the nuclear age. Political Psychology, 6(2), 213-217.
17. Franklin, A., Tranter, B., & White, R. (2001). Explaining support for animal rights: A comparison of two recent approaches to humans, nonhuman animals, and postmodernity. Society and Animals, 9(2), 127-144.
18. Garner, R. (2003). Political ideologies and the moral status of animals. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8(2), 233-246.
19. Giles, H., & Coupland, J. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/C vole.
20. Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
21. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264.
22. Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M., & Bastian, B. (2005). More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 937-950.
23. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Inglehart, R. (1990). Values, ideology and cognitive mobilization in new social movements. In R. Dalton & M. Kuechler (Eds.), Challenging the political order. Cambridge: Polity.
25. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization andpostmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F.J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 117-129.
27. Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D. F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: Sage.
28. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16(2), 397-424.
29. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27.
30. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Leyens, J. P., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., et al. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism: The 2002 Tajfel lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 703-717.
32. Leyens, J. P., Désert, M., Croizet, J. C., & Darcis, C. (2002). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1189-1199.
33. Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., et al. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186-197.
34. Leyens, J. P., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., et al. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 395-411.
35. Lyons, E., & Chryssochoou, X. (2000). Cross-cultural research methods. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, & C. Fife-Shaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
36. Malik, K. (2000). Man, beast and zombie: What science can and cannot tell us about human nature. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
37. Marcu, A., & Chryssochoou, X. (2005). Exclusion of ethnic groups from the realm of humanity: Prejudice against the Gypsies in Britam and in Romania. Psicología Politica, 30, 41-56.
38. Montgomery, S. (2006). Five horses killed in black day for Cheltenham. The Independent, March 17. Retrieved March 31, 2006, from http://sport.independent.co.uk/general/article351783ece
39. Opotow, S. (1990). Deterring moral exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 173-182.
40. Opotow, S. (1993). Animals and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 71-85.
41. Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
42. Pérez, J. A., Chulvi, B., & Alonso, R. (2001). When a majority fails to convert a minority: The case of Gypsies. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality: Promoting individual and social change. Ashland: Hogrefe and Huber.
43. Pérez, J. A., Moscovici, S., & Chulvi, B. (2002). Natura y cultura como principio de clasificación social. Anclaje de representaciones sociales sobre minorias étnicas. Revista de Psicología Social, 17(1), 51-67.
44. Plous, S. (2003). Is there such thing as prejudice toward animals? In S. Pious (Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
46. Regan, T. (1997). The rights of humans and other animals. Ethics and Behaviour, 7(2), 103-111.
47. Rollin, B. E. (2000). Scientific ideology, anthropomorphism, anecdote, and ethics. New Ideas in Psychology, 18(1), 109-118.
48. Ryder, R. (1971). Experiments on animals. In S. Godlovitch, R. Godlovitch, & J. Harris (Eds.), Animals, men and morals. New York: Taplinger Publishing.
49. Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). London: Jonathan Cape.
50. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387-412.