Intention, temporal order, and moral judgments

Mind and Language

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 90-106

  Sinnott Armstrong, Walter ^a   Mallon, Ron ^b   McCoy, Tom ^b   Hull, Jay G ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149065861     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: 14680017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00330.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anscombe, G.E.M. 1970 : War and murder. In R. Wasserstrom (ed War and Morality. Los Angeles : Wadsworth, pp. 42 53.
2. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. 1986 : The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 82.
3. Bentler, P.M. 1995 : EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA : Multivariate Software.
4. Bollen, K.A. 1989 : Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Oxford : John Wiley and Sons.
5. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. 1993 : Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (eds Testing Structural Equation Models. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
6. Cushman, F., Young, L. and Hauser, M. 2006 : The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082 9.
7. Donagan, A. 1977 : The Theory of Morality. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
8. Gert, B., Culver, C. and Clouser, K.D. 2006 : Bioethics: A Systematic Approach. New York : Oxford University Press.
9. Foot, P. 1967 : The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
10. Hauser. M. 2006 : Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York : Ecco.
11. Hauser. M., Young, L. and Cushman, F. 2008 : Reviving Rawls' linguistic analogy: operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
12. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. 1989 : LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago : SPSS.
13. Kamm, F. 2006 : Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. New York : Oxford University Press.
14. Kaplan, D. 2000 : Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
15. Knobe, J. 2003 : Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190 4.
16. Knobe, J. 2006 : The concept of intentional action: a case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130, 203 231.
17. Knobe, J. and Burra, A. 2006 : Intention and intentional action: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Culture and Cognition, 6, 113 32.
18. Leslie, A., Knobe, J. and Cohen, A. 2006 : Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: 'theory of mind' and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 421 7.
19. Machery, E. Forthcoming : Understanding the folk concept of intentional action: philosophical and experimental issues. Mind & Language.
20. McIntyre, A. 2004 : The doctrine of double effect. In E. Zalta (ed The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double- effect/
21. Mikhail, J. 2002 : Aspects of the theory of moral cognition: investigating intuitive knowledge of the prohibition of intentional battery and the principle of double effect. Downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=762385
22. Mikhail, J. 2007 : Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 143 52.
23. Thomson, J.J. 1976 : Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59, 204 217.
24. Woodward, P ed 2001 : The Doctrine of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press.