Getting rid of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg: Why do hosts delay rejection?

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 100-107

  Antonov, Anton ^a   Stokke, Bård G ^a   Moksnes, Arne ^a   Røskaft, Eivin ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Brood parasitism; Cuckoo; Egg recognition; Eggshell strength; Marsh warbler; Mimicry

Indexed keywords

BROOD PARASITISM; EGG; EGGSHELL; MIMICRY; PARASITE; PASSERINE; RECOGNITION;

ACROCEPHALUS PALUSTRIS; AVES; CUCULUS CANORUS;

EID: 38149063809     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm102     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alvarez F, Arias de Reyna L, Segura M. 1976. Experimental brood parasitism of the magpie (Pica pica). Anim Behav. 24:907-916.
2. Amundsen T, Brobakken PT, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2002. Rejection of common cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs in relation to female age in the bluethroat Luscinia svecica. J Avian Biol. 33:366-370.
3. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Kleven O, Honza M, Røskaft E. 2006. Eggshell strength of an obligate brood parasite: a test of the puncture resistance hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 60:11-18.
4. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2006. Egg rejection in marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk. 123:419-430.
5. Baker ECS. 1942. Cuckoo problems. London: Witherby Ltd.
6. Brooker MG, Brooker LC. 1991. Eggshell strength in cuckoos and cowbirds. Ibis. 133:406-413.
7. Cramp S. 1992. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol. VI: Warblers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Davies NB. 2000. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T & AD Poyser.
9. Davies NB, Brooke M de L. 1988. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav. 36:262-284.
10. Davies NB, Brooke M de L. 1989a. An experimental study of coevolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol. 58:207-224.
11. Davies NB, Brooke M de L. 1989b. An experimental study of coevolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol. 58:225-236.
12. Davies NB, Brooke M de L, Kacelnik A. 1996. Recognition errors and probability of parasitism determine whether reed warblers should accept or reject mimetic cuckoo eggs. Proc R Soc Lond B. 263:925-931.
13. Gärtner K. 1982. Das Wegnehmen von Wirtsvogeleiern durch den Kuckuck (Cuculus canorus). Ornithol Mitt. 33:115-131.
14. Hays H, LeCroy M. 1971. Field criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the common tern. Wilson Bull. 83:425-429.
15. Honza M, Grim T, Čapek M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2004. Nest defence, enemy recognition and nest inspection behaviour of experimentally parasitized reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. Bird Study 51:256-263.
16. Honza M, Picman J, Grim T, Novák V, Čapek M, Mrlík V. 2001. How to hatch from an egg of great structural strength. A study of the common cuckoo. J Avian Biol. 32:249-255.
17. Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Čapek M, Mrlík V. 2004. Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol. 22:175-180.
18. Lindholm AK. 2000. Tests of phenotypic plasticity in reed warbler defences against cuckoo parasitism. Behaviour. 137:43-60.
19. Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. 1992. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age - a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav Ecol. 3:128-132.
20. Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. 1995. Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo host coevolution. Anim Behav. 49:1185-1209.
21. Lyon B. 2007. Mechanism of egg recognition in defenses against conspecific brood parasitism: American coots (Fulica americana) know their own eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 61:455-463.
22. Marchetti K. 2000. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav. 59:877-883.
23. Martín-Vivaldi M, Soler M, Møller AP. 2002. Unrealistically high costs of rejecting artificial model eggs in cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. J Avian Biol. 33:295-301.
24. Mason P, Rothstein SI. 1986. Coevolution and avian brood parasitism: cowbird eggs show evolutionary response to host discrimination. Evolution. 40:1207-1214.
25. McLean IG, Maloney RF. 1998. Brood parasitism, recognition, and response: the options. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, editors. Parasitic birds and their hosts studies in coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Moksnes A. 1992. Egg recognition in chaffinches and bramblings. Anim Behav. 44:993-995.
27. Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 1992. Responses of some rare cuckoo hosts to mimetic model cuckoo eggs and to foreign conspecific eggs. Ornis Scand. 23:17-23.
28. Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 1995. Egg morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) - an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool Lond. 236:625-648.
29. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Bičík V, Honza M, Øien IJ. 1993. Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism on Acrocephalus warblers in Southern Moravia in the Czech Republic. J Ornithol. 134:425-434.
30. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT. 1991. Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk. 108:348-354.
31. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC. 1990. Behavioral responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour. 116:64-89.
32. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH. 2000. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis. 142:247-258.
33. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Korsnes L. 1993. Rejection of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs by meadow pipits (Anthus pratensis). Behav Ecol. 4:120-127.
34. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Solli MM. 1994. Documenting puncture ejection of parasitic eggs by chaffinches Fringilla coelebs and blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla. Fauna Norv Ser C Cinclus. 17:115-118.
35. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Tysse T. 1995. On the evolution of blue cuckoo eggs in Europe. J Avian Biol. 26:13-19.
36. Nakagawa S. 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol. 15:1044-1045.
37. Øien IJ, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 1996. The risk of parasitism in relation to the distance from reed warbler nests to cuckoo perches. J Anim Ecol. 65:147-153.
38. Øien IJ, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Honza M. 1998. Costs of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism to reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. J Avian Biol. 29:209-215.
39. Picman J. 1989. Mechanism of increased puncture resistance of eggs of brown-headed cowbirds. Auk. 106:577-583.
40. Picman J, Pribil S. 1997. Is greater eggshell density an alternative mechanism by which parasitic cuckoos increase the strength of their eggs? J Ornithol. 138:531-541.
41. Procházka P, Honza M. 2003. Do common whitethroats (Sylvia communis) discriminate against alien eggs? J Ornithol. 144:354-363.
42. Procházka P, Honza M. 2004. Egg discrimination in the yellowhammer. Condor. 106:405-410.
43. Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Lotem A. 1999. How to detect a cuckoo egg: a signal-detection theory model for recognition and learning. Am Nat. 153:633-648.
44. Rohwer S, Spaw CD. 1988. Evolutionary lag versus bill-size constraints: a comparative study of the acceptance of cowbird eggs by old hosts. Evol Ecol. 2:27-36.
45. Rothstein SI. 1972. Eggshell thickness and its variation in the Cedar Waxwing. Wilson Bull. 84:469-474.
46. Rothstein SI. 1975. An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor. 77:250-271.
47. Rothstein SI. 1982. Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: which egg parameters elicit host responses by rejecter species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 11:229-239.
48. Rothstein SI, Robinson SK. 1998. Parasitic birds and their hosts: studies in coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Soler M, Martín-Vivaldi M, Pérez-Contreras T. 2002. Identification of the sex responsible for recognition and the method of ejection of parasitic eggs in some potential common cuckoo hosts. Ethology. 108:1093-1101.
50. Stokke BG, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G. 2002. Costs associated with recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs in two European passerines. Behaviour. 139:629-644.
51. Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2005. The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol Sci. 4:17-29.
52. Stokke BG, Takasu F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2007. The importance of clutch characteristics and learning for anti-parasite adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Evolution. 61:2212-2228.
53. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG. 2006. Parameters of brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater egg discrimination in warbling vireos Vireo gilvus. J Avian Biol. 37:457-466.
54. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey (NJ): Prentice-Hall, Inc.