Protecting women from their abortion choices

Hastings Center Report

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 13-14

  Dresser, Rebecca ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ABORTION; LEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; STANDARD; THERAPEUTIC ABORTION; UNITED STATES;

ABORTION, LEGAL; ABORTION, THERAPEUTIC; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; SOUTH DAKOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38149059824     PISSN: 00930334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2007.0083     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
2. R.B. Siegel, "The New Politics of Abortion: An Equality Analysis of Woman-Protective Abortion Restrictions," University of Illinois Law Review (2007): 991-1053.
3. 127 S. Ct. 1610 (2007).
4. South Dakota Codified Laws sees. 34-23A-1 (2006).
5. Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds, 375 F. Supp. 2d 881 (D.S.D. 2005).
6. Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds, 467 F.3d 716 (8th Cir. 2006).
7. R. Post, "Informed Consent to Abortion: A First Amendment Analysis of Compelled Physician Speech," University of Illinois Law Review (2007): 939-90.