Women's experience of rage: A critical feminist analysis

Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 58-74

  Flemke, Kimberly ^a,c   Allen, Katherine R ^b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENN Council for Relationships   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; FEMINISM; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RAGE; SELF DISCLOSURE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGGRESSION; COGNITION; FEMALE; FEMINISM; HOSTILITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRISONERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RAGE; SELF DISCLOSURE; SPOUSE ABUSE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 38149049865     PISSN: 0194472X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00053.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen, K. R. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 4 17.
2. Allen, K. R. Walker, A. J. (2000). Qualitative research. In C. Hendrick S. S. Hendrick (Eds. Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 19 30). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
3. Aponte, H. J. (2003). The therapist's use of self in family therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 14, 90 92.
4. Aponte, H. J. Winter, J. E. (2000). The person and practice of the therapist: Treatment and training. In M. Baldwin (Ed. The use of self in therapy (pp. 127 165). Binghamton, NY : Haworth Press.
5. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651 680.
6. Baber, K. M. Allen, K. R. (1992). Women and families: Feminist reconstructions. New York : Guilford.
7. Bogdan, R. C. Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education (3rd ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
8. Bograd, M. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 25, 275 289.
9. Brice-Baker, J. (2003). Incarcerated African American women. In L. B. Silverstein T. J. Goodrich (Eds. Feminist family therapy: Empowerment in social context (pp. 241 252). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
10. Brody, L. R. Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis J. Haviland (Eds. Handbook of emotions (pp. 56 72). New York : Guilford.
11. Cascardi, M. Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265 293.
12. Cosgrove, L. McHugh, M. C. (2000). Speaking for ourselves: Feminist methods and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 816 838.
13. Cosgrove, L. McHugh, M. C. (2002). Deconstructing the difference: Conceptualizing feminist research from within the postmodern. In L. Collins, M. Dunlap J. Chrisler (Eds. Charting a new course for feminist psychology (pp. 20 36). Westport, CT : Praeger.
14. Crawford, J. Kippax, S. (1992). Emotion and gender. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
15. Dasgupta, S. D. (1999). Just like men? A critical view of violence by women. In M. F. Shepard E. L. Pence (Eds. Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 195 222). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
16. Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women's use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364 1389.
17. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M. Daly, M. (1992). The myth of spousal symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 401 421.
18. Emery, B. C. Lloyd, S. A. (1994). A feminist perspective on the study of women who use aggression in close relationships. In D. L. Sollie L. A. Leslie (Eds. Gender, families, and close relationships: Feminist research journeys (pp. 237 262). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
19. Feeny, N. C., Zoellner, L. A. Foa, E. B. (2000). Anger, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress disorder among female assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13, 89 100.
20. Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
21. Fishbane, M. D. (2001). Relational narratives of the self. Family Process, 40, 273 291.
22. Flemke, K. (2003). Women's experience of rage towards their intimate partners: Diverse voices within the criminal justice system. Paper presented at the University of Pennsylvania's Continuing Education Series, Philadelphia, PA.
23. Fontana, A. Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin Y. S. Lincoln (Eds. Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361 376). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
24. Frieze, I. H. McHugh, M. C. (1998). Measuring feminism and gender role attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 349 353.
25. Graham-Kevan, N. Archer, J. (2005). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18, 181 198.
26. Hamberger, L. K. Guse, C. E. (2002). Men's and women's use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8, 1301 1331.
27. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
28. Harned, M. S. (2001). Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 16, 269 285.
29. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2005). Female perpetration of physical aggression against an intimate partner: A controversial new topic of study. Violence and Victims, 20, 253 261.
30. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283 294.
31. Johnson, M. P. Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948 963.
32. Johnson, M. P. Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322 349.
33. Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed. New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108 138). New York : New York University Press.
34. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York : Routledge.
35. Lloyd, S. A. Emery, B. C. (2000). The dark side of courtship: Physical and sexual aggression. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
36. McHugh, M. C. (2005). Understanding gender and intimate partner abuse. Sex Roles, 52, 717 724.
37. McHugh, M. C., Livingston, N. A. Ford, A. (2005). A postmodern approach to women's use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 323 336.
38. Miller, J. Glassner, B. (2004). The "inside" and the "outside": Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 125 139). London : Sage.
39. Miller, J. B. Surrey, J. (1997). Rethinking women's anger: The personal and the global. In J. V. Jordan (Ed. Women's growth in diversity: More writings from the Stone Center (pp. 199 216). New York : Guilford.
40. Potter-Effron, R. Potter-Effron, P. (1995). Letting go of anger: The 10 most common styles and what to do about them. New York : New Harbinger.
41. Reid, P. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: Shut up and shut down. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133 150.
42. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York : Oxford University Press.
43. Renzetti, C. M. (1999). The challenge to feminism posed by women's use of violence in intimate relationships. In S. Lamb (Ed. New visions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 42 56). New York : New York University Press.
44. Richardson, D. S. (2005). The myth of female passivity: Thirty years of revelations about female aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 238 247.
45. Ring, J. (1997). Hannah Arendt and Eichmann controversy: Cultural taboos against female anger. Women and Politics, 18, 57 69.
46. Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
47. Stanley, L. Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology (2nd ed.). London : Routledge.
48. Sullivan, T. P., Meese, K. J., Swan, S. C., Mazure, C. M. Snow, D. L. (2005). Precursors and correlates of women's violence: Child abuse traumatization, victimization of women, avoidance coping, and psychological symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 290 301.
49. Swan, S. C., Gambone, L. J., Fields, A. M., Sullivan, T. P. Snow, D. L. (2005). Women who use violence in intimate relationships: The role of anger, victimization, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression. Violence and Victims, 20, 267 285.
50. Swan, S. C. Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women's use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286 319.
51. Swan, S. C. Snow, D. L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among abused women who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75 109.
52. Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York : Harper & Row.
53. Weis, L. (2004). Race, gender, and critique: African American women, White women, and domestic violence in the 1980s and 1990s. In L. Weis M. Fine (Eds. Working method: Research and social justice (pp. 27 51). New York : Routledge.