Development and content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting

Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 17-27

  Nieveen, Janet L ^a   Zimmerman, Lani M ^a   Barnason, Susan A ^a   Yates, Bernice C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CONTENT VALIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; THORAX PAIN;

ANGINA PECTORIS; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 38149011397     PISSN: 01479563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jenkins D., Stanton B., and Jono R. Quantifying and predicting recovery after heart surgery. Psychosom Med 56 (1994) 203-212
2. Miller K., and Grindell C. Comparison of symptoms of younger and older patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Clin Nurs Res 13 (2004) 179-193
3. Moore S. Development of discharge information for recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. Appl Nurs Res 17 (1994) 170-177
4. Artinian N., and Duggan C. Sex differences in patient recovery patterns after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung 24 (1995) 483-494
5. DiMattio M., and Tulman L. A longitudinal study of functional status and correlates following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in women. Nurs Res 52 (2003) 98-107
6. Edell-Gustafsson U., Hetta J., Aren G., et al. Measurement of sleep and quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting: a pilot study. Int J Nurs Pract 3 (1997) 239-246
7. Redeker N. Symptoms reported by older and middle-aged adults after coronary bypass surgery. Clin Nurs Res 2 (1993) 148-159
8. Zimmerman L., Barnason S., Brey B., Catlin S., and Nieveen J. Comparison of recovery patterns for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the early discharge period. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing 17 (2002) 132-141
9. Redeker N., Mason D., Wykpisz E., et al. Sleep patterns in women after coronary artery bypass surgery. Appl Nurs Res 9 (1996) 155-22
10. Ruiz B., Dibble S., Gilliss C., et al. Predictors of general activity 8 weeks after cardiac surgery. Appl Nurs Res 5 (1992) 59-65
11. Spertus J., Winder J., Dewhurst T., et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 25 (1995) 333-341
12. Piper B., Dibble S., Dodd M., et al. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 25 (1998) 677-684
13. Moore S. A comparison of women's and men's symptoms during home recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung 24 (1995) 495-501
14. Tack B., and Gilliss C. Nurse-monitored cardiac recovery: a description of the first 8 weeks. Heart Lung 19 (1990) 491-499
15. The University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing Symptom Management Faculty Group. A model for symptom management. Image J Nurs Sch 16 (1994) 272-276
16. Dodd M., Janson S., Facione N., et al. Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33 (2001) 668-676
17. Wu C. Assessment of postdischarge concerns of coronary artery bypass graft patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs 10 (1995) 1-7
18. Savage L., and Grap M. Telephone monitoring after early discharge for cardiac surgery patients. Am J Crit Care 8 (1999) 154-159
19. Artinian N., Duggan C., and Miller P. Age differences in patient recovery patterns following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Crit Care 2 (1993) 453-461
20. Jaarsma T., Kastermans M., Dassen T., et al. Problems of cardiac patients in early recovery. J Adv Nurs 21 (1995) 21-27
21. Stewart B., and Archbold P. Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: part one. Res Nurs Health 15 (1992) 477-481
22. Stewart B., and Archbold P. Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: part two. Res Nurs Health 16 (1993) 77-81
23. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 35 (1986) 382-385
24. Langeluddecke P., Fulcher G., Baird D., et al. A prospective evaluation of the psychosocial effects of coronary artery bypass surgery. J Psychosom Res 33 (1989) 37-45
25. Grant J., and Davis L. Focus on quantitative methods: selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 20 (1997) 269-274
26. Waltz C., Strickland O., and Lenz E. Measurement in nursing research. 2nd ed. (1991), F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA
27. Crane P. Fatigue and physical activity in older women after myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 34 (2005) 30-38
28. Plach S., and Heidrich S. Women's perceptions of their social roles after heart surgery and coronary angioplasty. Heart Lung 30 (2001) 117-127
29. Gallagher R. Commentary on: comparison of symptoms of younger and older patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Clin Nurs Res 13 (2004) 194-198