3D forward and inverse modeling of total-field magnetic anomalies caused by a uniformly magnetized layer defined by a linear combination of 2D Gaussian functions

Geophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  García Abdeslem, Juan ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR DE ENSENADA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; GEOPHYSICS; INTEGRATION; NUMERICAL METHODS;

FORWARD MODELING; GAUSSIAN FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIZED LAYER; NONLINEAR INVERSION;

GEOMAGNETISM;

ALGORITHM; AMPLITUDE; DATA INVERSION; GAUSSIAN METHOD; INVERSE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL METHOD; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 38149009678     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2806923     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abramowitz, M., 1972, Elementary analytical methods, in M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables: Dover Publications, Inc.
2. Bhattacharyya, B. K., 1980, A generalized multibody model for inversion of magnetic anomalies: Geophysics, 45, 255-270. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441081
3. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
4. Caratori Tontini, F., 2005, Magnetic-anomaly Fourier spectrum of a 3D Gaussian source: Geophysics, 70, no. 1, L1-L5. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
5. Caratori Tontini, F., O. Faggioni, N. Beverini, and C. Carmisciano, 2003, Gaussian envelope for 3D geomagnetic data inversion: Geophysics, 68, 996-1007. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
6. Carnahan, B., H. A. Luther, and J. O. Wilkes, 1969, Applied numerical methods: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7. CETENAL (Comisión de Estudios del Territorio Nacional), 1974, Carta geológica El Salvador (C14-C-64), escala 1:50,000.
8. Davis, P. J., and I. Polonsky, 1972, Numerical interpolation, differentiation and integration, in M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables: Dover Publications, Inc.
9. García-Abdeslem, J., 1992, Gravitational attraction of a rectangular prism with depth-dependent density: Geophysics, 57, 470-473. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
10. 2003, 2D modeling and inversion of gravity data using density contrast varying with depth and source-basement geometry described by the Fourier series: Geophysics, 68, 1909-1916. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
11. Guillen, A., and V. Menichetti, 1984, Gravity and magnetic inversion with minimization of a specific functional: Geophysics, 49, 1354-1360. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441761
12. Last, B. J., and K. Kubik, 1983, Compact gravity inversion: Geophysics, 48, 713-721. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441501
13. Levenberg, K., 1944, A method for the solution of certain nonlinear problems in least squares: Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2, 164-168. qam QAMAAY 0033-569X
14. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1996, 3D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394-408. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443968
15. 2000, Joint inversion of surface and three-component borehole magnetic data: Geophysics, 65, 540-552. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444749
16. Marquardt, D. W., 1970, Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation and nonlinear estimation: Technometrics, 12, 591-612. thn TCMTA2 0040-1706 10.2307/1267205
17. Nabighian, M. N., V. J. S. Grauch, R. O. Hansen, T. R. LaFehr, Y. Li, J. W. Peirce, J. D. Phillips, and M. E. Ruder, 2005, The historical development of the magnetic method of exploration: Geophysics, 70, no. 6, 33ND-61ND. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2133784
18. Oldenburg, D. W., 1974, The inversion and interpretation of gravity anomalies: Geophysics, 39, 526-536. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1440444
19. Parker, R. L., 1973, The rapid calculation of potential anomalies: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31, 447-455. gjr GEOJAN 0016-8009
20. Portniaguine, O., and M. S. Zhdanov, 2002, 3D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing: Geophysics, 67, 1532-1541. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1512749
21. Ruotoistenmäki, T., 1992, The gravity anomaly of two-dimensional sources with continuous density distribution and bounded by continuous surfaces: Geophysics, 57, 623-628. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443274
22. 1993, The magnetic anomaly of 3D sources having arbitrary geometry and magnetization: Geophysical Prospecting, 41, 413-433. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1993.tb00577.x
23. Silva, J. B. C., W. E. Medeiros, and V. C. F. Barbosa, 2001, Potential-field inversion, Choosing the appropriate technique to solve a geologic problem: Geophysics, 66, 511-520. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1444941
24. Zeyen, H., and J. Pous, 1991, A new 3-D inversion algorithm for magnetic total field anomalies: Geophysical Journal International, 104, 583-591. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb05703.x