Tolerance of eight sweet corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to pyroxasulfone

HortScience

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 170-172

  Sikkema, Sarah R ^a   Soltani, Nader ^a   Sikkema, Peter H ^a   Robinson, Darren E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Herbicide injury; KIH 485; Pyroxasulfone; Sensitivity; Sweet corn; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

FITS AND TOLERANCES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WEED CONTROL;

HARVEST GOLD; ONTARIO; PYROXASULFONES; SWEET CORN;

HERBICIDES;

GLYCINE MAX; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 38049177832     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.43.1.170     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anonymous. 2006. KIH-485 experimental herbicide. Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., White Plains, NY.
2. Bartlett, M.S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39-52.
3. Corbett, C.L., N. Soltani, A.S. Hamill, P.H. Sikkema, S. Bowley, and D.E. Robinson. 2005. Tolerance of three sweet corn hybrids to a postemergence tankmix of nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil. HortScience 40:616-619.
4. Diebold, S., D. Robinson, J. Zandstra, J. O'Sullivan, and P. Sikkema. 2003. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to AE F130360. Weed Technol. 17:127-132.
5. Diebold, S., D. Robinson, J. Zandstra, J. O'Sullivan, and P. Sikkema. 2004. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to bentazon. Weed Technol. 18:982-987.
6. Dyer, C.D., T.T. Bauman, and M.D. White. 2004. Weed control and soil longevity of KIH-485, acetochlor, dimethenamid, and S-metolachlor. Proc. NCWSS 59:63.
7. Geier, P.W. and P.W. Stahlman. 2004. Comparison of KIH-485 and S-metolachlor in corn. Proc. NCWSS 59:72.
8. Mailvaganam, S. 2006. Area, production and farm value of specified commercial vegetable crops, Ontario, 2005. 13 July 2006. 〈www.omafra.gov. on.ca/english/stats/hort/vegsummetric05.html〉.
9. Morton, C. and R.G. Harvey. 1992. Sweet com (Zea mays) hybrid tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:91-96.
10. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. 2006. Guide to weed control. Publication 75. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
11. O'Sullivan, J. and W.J. Bouw. 1998. Sensitivity of processing sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivars to nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78:151-154.
12. O'Sullivan, J., R.A. Brammall, and W.J. Bouw. 1995. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivars to nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:58-62.
13. O'Sullivan, J. and P. Sikkema. 2001. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to CGA 152005 postemergence. Weed Technol. 15: 204-207.
14. O'Sullivan, J. and P. Sikkema. 2002. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to primisulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:261-264.
15. O'Sullivan, J., P. Sikkema, and R.J. Thomas. 2000. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to nicosulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:419-423.
16. O'Sullivan, J., R.J. Thomas, and P. Sikkema. 2001. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to RPA 2017721. Weed Technol. 15:332-336.
17. O'Sullivan, J., J. Zandstra, and P. Sikkema. 2002. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to mesotrione. Weed Technol. 16:421-425.
18. Robinson, D.K., D.W. Monks, J.R. Schultheis, and A.D. Worsham. 1993. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to application timing of nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:840-843.
19. Stall, W.M. and T.A. Bewick. 1992. Sweet corn cultivars respond differentially to the herbicide nicosulfuron. HortScience 27:131-133.
20. Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. The SAS system for Windows. Release 8.0. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.
21. Soltani, N., S. Diebold, D.E. Robinson, and P.H. Sikkema. 2005a. Sweet corn hybrid sensitivity to clopyralid. Weed Technol. 19:342-345.
22. Soltani, N., P.H. Sikkema, and D.E. Robinson. 2005b. Sweet corn (Zea mays) hybrids responses to thifensulfuron-methyl. HortScience 40:1381-1383.
23. Soltani, N., P.H. Sikkema, J. Zandstra, J. O'Sullivan, and D.E. Robinson. 2007. Response of eight sweet corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to topramezone. HortScience 42:110-112.