The negative impacts of starting middle school in sixth grade

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 104-121

  Cook, Philip J ^a   MacCoun, Robert ^a   Muschkin, Clara ^b   Vigdor, Jacob ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049173470     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20309     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alspaugh, J. W. (1998). The relationship of school to school transitions and school size to high school dropout rates. The High School Journal, 81, 154-160.
2. Alspaugh, J. W. (2001). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 20-25.
3. Alspaugh, J. W., & Harting, R. D. (1995). Transition effects of school grade-level organization on student achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, 145-149.
4. Barber, B. K., & Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 3-30.
5. Bedard, K., & Do, C. (2005). Are middle schools more effective? The impact of school structure on student outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 660-682.
6. Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. P. (2003). The moderation of adolescent-to-peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use by school levels of substance use. Child Development, 74, 279-291.
7. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778-820.
8. Cook, P. J. (2003). Comment on catching cheating teachers. In W. G. Gale & J. R. Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003 (pp. 210-215). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Crump, R. K., Hotz, V. J., Imbens, G. W., & Mitnik, O. A. (2006). Moving the goalposts: Addressing limited overlap in the estimation of average treatment effects by changing the estimand. NBER Technical Working Paper 330, Cambridge, MA.
10. Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1053-1062.
11. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., MacIver, D., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 553-574.
12. Elias, M. J., Gara, M., & Ubriaco, M. (1985). Sources of stress and support in children's transition to middle school: An empirical analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14, 112-118.
13. Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Longshore, D. L. (2003). New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of Project ALERT in middle schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1830-1836.
14. Goldin, C. (1999). A brief history of education in the United States. NBER Historical Paper No. 119, Cambridge, MA.
15. Gootman, E. (2007a). Trying to find solutions in chaotic middle schools. The New York Times, Jan. 3, A1.
16. Gootman, E. (2007b). Taking middle schoolers out of the middle. The New York Times, Jan. 24, A1.
17. Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, S. (2004). Disruption versus tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1721-1746.
18. Hardy, C., Bukowski, W. M., & Sippola, L. K. (2002). Stability and change in peer relationships during the transition to middle level school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 117-142.
19. Hough, D. (1997). A bona fide middle school: Programs, policy, practice, and grade span configurations. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 285-294). Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
20. Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Catching cheating teachers: The results of an unusual experiment in implementing theory. In W. G. Gale & J. R. Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003 (pp. 185-220). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
21. Jacobson, M. (2004). Baby booms and drug busts: Trends in youth drug use in the United States, 1975-2000. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 1481-1512.
22. Jang, S. J. (1999). Age-varying effects of family, school and peers on delinquency: A multilevel modeling test of interactional theory. Criminology, 37, 643-685.
23. Juvonen, J., Le, V., Kaganoff, T., Augustine, C., & Constant, L. (2004). Focus on the wonder years: Challenges facing the American middle school. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
24. Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research (pp. 145-264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531-542.
26. McEwin, K. C., Greene, M. W., & Jenkins, D. M. (2001). Where do North Carolina's middle schools stand in the 21st century? A status report on programs and practices. Pinehurst, NC: North Carolina Middle School Association.
27. McLeod, J. D., & Kaiser, K. (2004). Childhood emotional and behavioral problems in educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 69, 636-658.
28. Mills, R. (1998). Grouping students for instruction in middle schools. Eric Digest, Report: EDO-PS-98-4.
29. National Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle level schools. Columbus, OH: Author.
30. National Middle School Association. (2001). Grade configuration. NMSA Research Summary #1 (updated September 2001). Columbus, OH: Author.
31. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2004). Last best chance 2004: Educating young adolescents in the twenty-first century. Middle Grades Task Force Report. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction and State Board of Education.
32. Reinke, W. M., & Walker, H. M. (2006). Deviant peer effects in education. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth (pp. 122-140). New York: The Guilford Press.
33. Rudolph, K. D., Lambert, S. F., Clark, A. G., & Kurlakowsky, K. D. (2001). Negotiating the transition to middle school: The role of self-regulatory processes. Child Development, 72, 929-946.
34. Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583-625.
35. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63-84.
36. Simmons, R. O., & Blythe, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence. New York, NY: Aldin De Gruyter.
37. South, S. J., & Messner, S. F. (2000). Crime and demography: Multiple linkages, reciprocal relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 83-106.
38. Teitler, J., & Weiss, C. (2000). Effects of neighborhood and school environments on transitions to first sexual intercourse. Sociology of Education, 73, 112-132.
39. Valentine, J. W., Clark, D., Hackmann, D., & Petzo, V. (2002). Leadership in middle level schools, volume I: A national study of middle level leaders and school principals. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
40. Weiss, C. C., & Knipes, L. (2006). Reexamining middle school effects: A comparison of middle grades students in middle schools and K-8 schools. American Journal of Education, 112, 239-272.
41. Zernicke, K. (2007). The preteen: Betwixt and bedeviled. The New York Times, Jan. 7, 4:3.