Comparison of direct and indirect sampling methods for tarnished plant bug (Hemiptera: Miridae) in flowering cotton

Journal of Economic Entomology

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1916-1923

  Musser, F ^a   Stewart, S ^b   Bagwell, R ^c   Lorenz, G ^d   Catchot, A ^a   Burris, E ^e   Cook, D ^e,f   Robbins, J ^a   Greene, J ^d,g   Studebaker, G ^d   Gore, J ^h  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK   (United States)

^e United States Public Health Service Hospital   (United States)

^f MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Bias; Efficiency; Lygus lineolaris

Indexed keywords

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; HEMIPTERA; LYGUS LINEOLARIS; MIRIDAE;

EID: 38049161609     PISSN: 00220493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jee/100.6.1916     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Binns, M. R., J. P. Nyrop, and W. van der Werf. 2000. Sampling and monitoring in crop protection: the theoretical basis for designing practical decision guides. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom.
2. Black, E. R. 1973. Economic threshold studies of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris, in cotton. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Entomology. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
3. Byerly, K. F., A. P. Gutierrez, R. E. Jones, and R. F. Luck. 1978. A comparison of sampling methods for some arthropod populations in cotton. Hilgardia 46: 257-282.
4. Catchot, A. 2005. 2005 Cotton insect control guide. Mississippi State University Extension Service. Publication 343.
5. Cherry, R. H., K. A. Wood, and W. G. Ruesink. 1977. Emergence trap and sweep net sampling for adults of the potato leafhopper from alfalfa. J. Econ. Entomol. 70: 279-282.
6. Ellington, J., K. Kiser, G. Ferguson, and M. Cardenas. 1984. A comparison of sweep net, absolute and insectavac sampling methods in cotton ecosystems. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 599-605.
7. Fleischer, S. J., M. J. Gaylor, and J. V. Edelson. 1985. Estimating absolute density from relative sampling of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) and selected predators in early to mid-season cotton. Environ. Entomol. 14:709-717.
8. Garcia, A., D. Gonzalez, and T. F. Leigh. 1982. Three methods for sampling arthropod numbers on California cotton. Environ. Entomol. 11: 565-572.
9. Gore, J. 2005. Tarnished plant bug sampling and management in the Mississippi Delta, pp. 1234-1238. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, 4-7 January 2005, New Orleans, LA. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
10. Greene, J. K., S. G. Turnipseed, M. J. Sullivan, and O. L. May. 2001. Treatment thresholds for stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 403-409.
11. Harris, F. A., F. T. Cooke, G. L. Andrews, and R. E. Furr, Jr. 1997. Monitoring node above white flower as basis for cotton insecticide treatment termination. Bulletin 1068, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State, MS.
12. Layton, M. B. 2000. Biology and damage of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris, in cotton. Southwest. Entomol. Suppl. 23: 7-20.
13. Morris, R. F. 1960. Sampling insect populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5: 243-264.
14. Powell, W., M. P. Walton, and M. A. Jervis. 1996. Populations and communities, pp. 223-292. In M. Jervis and N. Kidd [eds.], Insect natural enemies: practical approaches to their study and evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.
15. Race, S. R. 1960. A comparison of two sampling techniques for Lygus bugs and stink bugs on cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. 53: 689-690.
16. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS for Windows, version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
17. Snodgrass, G. L. 1993. Estimating absolute density of nymphs of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) in cotton using drop cloth and sweep-net sampling methods. J. Econ. Entomol. 86: 1116-1123.
18. Snodgrass, G. L. 1998. Distribution of the tarnished plant bug (Heteroptera: Miridae) within cotton plants. Environ. Entomol. 27: 1089-1093.
19. Stewart, S. D. and G. L. Lentz. 2005. 2005 Cotton insect control guide. Publication 387, University of Tennessee Extension, Knoxville, TN.
20. Stewart, S. D., J. Smith, J. Reed, R. Luttrell, C. D. Parker, and F. A. Harris. 2001. Comparing drop cloth, sweep net and suction sampling methods for arthropods in cotton, pp. 951-954. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, 9-13 January 2001, Anaheim, CA. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
21. Williams, M. R. 2006. Cotton insect losses. (http://www.msstate. edu/Entomology/Cotton.html).
22. Young, S. C., Jr., and P. Tugwell. 1975. Different methods of sampling for clouded and tarnished plant bugs in Arkansas cotton fields. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Report Ser. 219: 12.
23. Zink, A. G., and J. A. Rosenheim. 2004. State-dependent sampling bias in insects: implications for monitoring western tarnished plant bugs Entomol. Exp. Appl. 113: 117-123.