Fast non-rigid surface detection, registration and realistic augmentation

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 109-122

  Pilet, Julien ^a   Lepetit, Vincent ^a   Fua, Pascal ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Non rigid augmented reality; Non rigid detection; Real time deformable registration

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

NON RIGID AUGMENTED REALITY; NON RIGID DETECTION;

IMAGE REGISTRATION;

EID: 38049153581     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-006-0017-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baker, S., Matthews, I., Xiao, J., Gross, R., Kanade, T., and Ishikawa, T. 2004. Real-time non-rigid driver head tracking for driver mental state estimation. In World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
2. Bartoli, A. and Zisserman, A. 2004. Direct estimation of non-rigid registration. In British Machine Vision Conference, Kingston, UK.
3. Belongie, S., Malik, J., and Puzicha, J. 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(24):509-522.
4. Chui, H. and Rangarajan, A. 2003. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89(2-3):114-141.
5. Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., and Taylor, C.J. 2001. Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(6).
6. DeCarlo, D. and Metaxas, D. 1998. Deformable model-based shape and motion analysis from images using motion residual error. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, India, pp. 113-119.
7. Dewaele, G., Devernay, F., and Horaud, R. 2004. Hand motion from 3d point trajectories and a smooth surface model. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 495-507.
8. Ferrari, V., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. 2004. Simultaneous object recognition and segmentation by image exploration. In European Conference on Computer Vision.
9. Fischler, M.A. and Bolles, R.C. 1981. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications ACM, 24(6):381-395.
10. Fua, P. 1997. RADIUS: Image Understanding for Intelligence Imagery. In Chapter Model-Based Optimization: An Approach to Fast, Accurate, and Consistent Site Modeling from Imagery, M. Kaufmann, O. Firschein, and T.M. Strat, (Eds.).
11. Granger, S. and Pennec, X. 2002. Multi-scale em-icp: A fast and robust approach for surface registration. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 418-432
12. Gumerov, N.A., Zandifar, A., Duraiswami, R., and Davis, L.S. 2004. Structure of Applicable Surfaces from Single Views. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague.
13. Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. 2000. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press.
14. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1988. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321-331.
15. Lepetit, V. and Fua, P. 2005. Monocular model-based 3d tracking of rigid objects: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, 1(1):1-89.
16. Lepetit, V., Lagger, P., and Fua, P. 2005. Randomized trees for real-time keypoint recognition. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, CA.
17. Lin, W.-C. and Liu, Y. 2006, May. Tracking dynamic near-regular textures under occlusion and rapid movements. In European Conference on Computer Vision.
18. Ling, H. and Jacobs, D.W. 2005. Deformation invariant image matching. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Beijing, China, pp. 1466-1473.
19. Lowe, D.G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 20(2):91-110.
20. Rosten, E. and Drummond, T. 2005. Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Beijing, China.
21. Sclaroff, S. and Isidoro, J. 2003. Active blobs: region-based, deformable appearance models. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89(2-3).
22. White, R. and Forsyth, D.A. 2006. Retexturing single views using texture and shading. In European Conference on Computer Vision, volume LNCS 3954, pp. 70-81.
23. Wills, J. and Belongie, S. 2004. A feature-based approach for determining long range optical flow. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech Republic.