Comparing argumentation semantics with respect to skepticism

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4724 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 210-221

  Baroni, Pietro ^a   Giacomin, Massimiliano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Argumentation semantics; Skepticism

Indexed keywords

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ARGUMENTATION SEMANTICS; SKEPTICISM;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 38049148691     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Vreeswijk, G.A.W.: Interpolation of benchmark problems in defeasible reasoning. In: Proc. of the 2nd World Conf. on the Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence (WOCFAI 95), Paris, France, pp. 453-468 (1995)
2. Prakken, H.: Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. In: Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002), Toulouse, France, pp. 91-102 (2002)
3. Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: An axiomatic account of formal argumentation. In: Proc. of the Twentieth National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), Menlo Park, pp. 608-613. AAAI Press, Stanford (2005)
4. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-357 (1995)
5. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argumentation semantics. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Models of Arguments (COMMA 2006), Liverpool, pp. 157-168. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
6. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: Towards a formalization of skepticism in extension-based argumentation semantics. In: Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2004), Valencia, E, pp. 47-52 (2004)
7. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 440-451. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
8. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence 168(1-2), 165-210 (2005)
9. Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Models of Arguments (COMMA 2006), Liverpool, pp. 121-130. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
10. Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Models of Arguments (COMMA 2006), Liverpool, pp. 145-156. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
11. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Prudent semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: Proc. of the 17th IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2005), Hong Kong, pp. 568-572. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)
12. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Sémantiques prudentes pour les systèmes d'argumentation. In: Proc. of the 15th Congres AFRIF-AFIA Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle (RFIA 2006), Tours, F (2006)
13. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Evaluating argumentation semantics with respect to skepticism adequacy. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 329-340. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
14. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation, comparison, and design of extension-based argumentation semantics. Tech. Rep., Univ. of Brescia, I (2007)
15. Prakken, H.: Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Models of Arguments (COMMA 2006), Liverpool, pp. 311-322. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)